Supreme court blocks Obama carbon emission plan

Much of today’s science is basically astrology; drawing interpretations to support a predetermined objective largely established by government and the science funding machine. When government-funded science has a solution which means more taxes (carbon), more unelected government regulations (Environmental Protection Agency), agency refusal to release the science behind their decisions (EPA, NOAA, NASA), abdication of science to the United Nations, and the de facto nationalization of the energy industry; then we should all be very afraid. Climate change is cause of climate change
 
Much of today’s science is basically astrology; drawing interpretations to support a predetermined objective largely established by government and the science funding machine. When government-funded science has a solution which means more taxes (carbon), more unelected government regulations (Environmental Protection Agency), agency refusal to release the science behind their decisions (EPA, NOAA, NASA), abdication of science to the United Nations, and the de facto nationalization of the energy industry; then we should all be very afraid. Climate change is cause of climate change


"basically astrology"..........lmao........:2up::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Chief Justice Roberts is going to withhold several key decisions from this session and wait until the FULL 9 jurists are present to make a decision or rehear the cases.

One being the Obamacare contraceptive mandate, Another the EPA-executive branch over reach, among others while leaving the current injunctions in place stopping their implementation..

That's gonna leave a mark.. The alarmist will be crying loudly!

The court will be only deciding those issues where Scalia's vote did not make the difference in the decision... Those items which are controversial and balance changing will have to wait for a full court.

Way to Go Chief Justice Roberts!
 
SCOTUS has agreed to hear the case.

No, they haven't. Issuing a stay is completely different from agreeing to hear a case. It does mean it's likely they will agree to hear it later, but it hasn't happened yet.

The DC circus will hear the case, as they have no jurisdiction,

The DC Circuit specifically has jurisdiction over the rule making of federal agencies. That would be why they're hearing oral arguments on June 2.

it will still have to be heard by SCOTUS. Until oral arguments are heard in the SCOTUS nothing will change.

That's assuming the SC takes the case. But the timing of it isn't a big deal, as nothing takes effect until after 2020 anyways. If it remains stayed until 2017, it doesn't affect anything.

Good luck with your revisionist thinking.. The facts show you a fool.

Your best strategy now, after losing in the DC circuit, is to play for time. If it goes to the SC quickly, it will lose, and that loss is irrevocable. You have to delay getting it to the SC by asking for en banc review in the DC circuit, and hope you can block Obama's nomination, and hope for a Republican to win the presidency.
Nope!

Chief Justice Roberts just place those issues on hold until all 9 jurists are present. BAM!

And we will do to Obama what you libtards did to Bush's appointments starting 19 months before his end of term..

Karma is a bitch.... And you just got slapped!
 
Some puckish pundit just put forward a call to reinstate O'Connor. Sounds good to me! Hahahaha. Problem solved.
 

Forum List

Back
Top