- Banned
- #961
Voicing your opinion as an anonymous poster on a message board is not taking action.Simply saying it doesn't make it so. It's pure conjecture on both our parts. I think if BJU (the irony ) tried the same shit today, I believe the outcome would be the same. You disagree. We'll never know.
The outcome of Obergefell v Hodges does not change because you don't think it's real and your opinion on it, along with $3 can get you a cup of coffee.
PA laws have been found Constitutional to this point. I urge you to legally challenge Title II of the CRA. We'll be rooting for you.
The way your side did it leaves the issue open, just like Roe V Wade hasn't ended the abortion debate.
And the only challenge to Title II or the CRA would have to involve limiting PA's to actual PA's, not every business in the country.
Uh huh...do you really think a SCOTUS will ever repeal civil marriage for gays? Come on...by the time you could even get a "conservative" justice to replace a "liberal" one...WAY too many horses will be out for there to be a closing of the barn door. You'd have to get rid of more than one 'cause despite his dissention, Roberts is in no way going to agree with repealing it.
2nd option? A Constitutional Amendment. (cue hysterical laughter). Non starter.
So when you going to legally challenge PA laws? You going after the big dog or just the local and state ones that protect icky gays?
I will leave it up to the people with the free time on their hands.
Right...you're too busy whining about it on the internet to actually DO something about it.
No, i'm voicing my opinion on it, something you seem to have an issue with. But it's easier for those like you to attack the ability of someone to have an opinion (in your view) than the opinion itself.