Sotomayor: Americans Should Be Alarmed By Spread Of Drones

[Freewill]

Its an Obama world.

Said Justice Sotomayor:

There are drones flying over the air randomly that are recording everything that’s happening on what we consider our private property. That type of technology has to stimulate us to think about what is it that we cherish in privacy and how far we want to protect it and from whom. Because people think that it should be protected just against government intrusion, but I don’t like the fact that someone I don’t know…can pick up, if they’re a private citizen, one of these drones and fly it over my property.

Sotomayor Americans Should be Alarmed by Spread of Drones - Law Blog - WSJ

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wow

Just fucking wow

 

[HenryBHough]

Soto's off the reservation!

Can a White House suggestion that she retire quickly before she can embarrass OKP any further be far behind? Maybe a suggestion delivered by a drone? I mean, from a drone.....

 

[Freewill]

I never would have guessed she sun bathed bare back.

 

[HenryBHough]

I never would have guessed she sun bathed bare back.

Nor would any other sane male.

 

[Freewill]

I never would have guessed she sun bathed bare back.

Nor would any other sane male.

What do you think she meant when she said "consider our private property?"

 

[HenryBHough]

What do you think she meant when she said "consider our private property?"

You raise an interesting point given that so many recent decisions deny the existence of private property....or, rather, the right to hold any property.

 

[occupied]

Those drones would still be there watching us with a republican as president only then conservatives would imagine they are being used against liberals and be totally OK with them.

 

[Freewill]

Those drones would still be there watching us with a republican as president only then conservatives would imagine they are being used against liberals and be totally OK with them.

Amazing how the left wing knows things that don't happen would happen as fact. As if that is an excuse by this administration to use them. What would be different is that you would be bitchin if this were Bush and you would be saying Sotomayor is a hero. But since it is Obama, you and silent as the lambs.

 

[HenryBHough]

Those drones would still be there watching us with a republican as president only then conservatives would imagine they are being used against liberals and be totally OK with them.

That's simply demonstration that "What goes around comes around".....exactly why nipping at Obama's skirts are beyond reasonable criticism so long as they do not exceed what was done to Bush. So far it hasn't even come close.

 

[amrchaos]

Those drones would still be there watching us with a republican as president only then conservatives would imagine they are being used against liberals and be totally OK with them.

I don't want drones watching me regardless who is president. You are too focus on defending Democrats versus getting rid of things like the Patriot ACT.(forgot about that,huh?)

Stay focus here..If there are conservative voters enlisting to stop the spread of drones, then now is the time to act against those policies!!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Its an Obama world.


This fails as a post hoc fallacy and is partisan idiocy.


There is no evidence that the president is the 'cause' of drones, or otherwise responsible for their use or proliferation.


What do you think she meant when she said "consider our private property?"


Not government property.

 

[Pennywise]

Every now and then Soto talks some sense.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Administration might want to Breibart Sotomeyer. They thought she was a True Believer

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Those drones would still be there watching us with a republican as president only then conservatives would imagine they are being used against liberals and be totally OK with them.

We have the Obama Precedent on the IRS and NSA

 

[Two Thumbs]

Its an Obama world.

Said Justice Sotomayor:

There are drones flying over the air randomly that are recording everything that’s happening on what we consider our private property. That type of technology has to stimulate us to think about what is it that we cherish in privacy and how far we want to protect it and from whom. Because people think that it should be protected just against government intrusion, but I don’t like the fact that someone I don’t know…can pick up, if they’re a private citizen, one of these drones and fly it over my property.

Sotomayor Americans Should be Alarmed by Spread of Drones - Law Blog - WSJ

So she cares b/c a stranger might peep on her, but not b/c the government can record her entire life?

 

[Two Thumbs]

Those drones would still be there watching us with a republican as president only then conservatives would imagine they are being used against liberals and be totally OK with them.

and since the (D) is in charge, you are ok with it going on now.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Its an Obama world.


This fails as a post hoc fallacy and is partisan idiocy.


There is no evidence that the president is the 'cause' of drones, or otherwise responsible for their use or proliferation.


What do you think she meant when she said "consider our private property?"


Not government property.

yea, right

you do know that obamas name is on The Patriot Act

so you leftist are ok with this, since you can't bring yourselves to demand obama make these changes

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Those drones would still be there watching us with a republican as president only then conservatives would imagine they are being used against liberals and be totally OK with them.

They're watching us now and an R isn't in charge.

 

[hjmick]

Every now and then Soto talks some sense.

Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and again...