A simple question:
Should state unions be stronger than a state government?
Why?
Should state unions be stronger than a state government?
Why?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A state government can kill someone (see death row). A union cannot legally kill anyone.A simple question:
Should state unions be stronger than a state government?
Why?
A state government can kill someone (see death row). A union cannot legally kill anyone.A simple question:
Should state unions be stronger than a state government?
Why?
A state government has an obligation to its employees to provide decent, safe working conditions and a competative wage for labor. Should a state government be so strong that this simple obligation can be breached?
A state government can kill someone (see death row). A union cannot legally kill anyone.A simple question:
Should state unions be stronger than a state government?
Why?
A state government has an obligation to its employees to provide decent, safe working conditions and a competative wage for labor. Should a state government be so strong that this simple obligation can be breached?
Not all state jobs are union jobs. They still enjoy a decent safe working environment with competative wages. But, aren't the unions pension and benefit contracts helping to bankrupt several states?
Unions are running this country into the ground.NO. If the union was more powerful than the government, then the government isn't the government, the union is.
A state government can kill someone (see death row). A union cannot legally kill anyone.
A state government has an obligation to its employees to provide decent, safe working conditions and a competative wage for labor. Should a state government be so strong that this simple obligation can be breached?
Not all state jobs are union jobs. They still enjoy a decent safe working environment with competative wages. But, aren't the unions pension and benefit contracts helping to bankrupt several states?
And the state government's aren't? The government is the biggest culprit for states going bankrupt-not unions.
Not all state jobs are union jobs. They still enjoy a decent safe working environment with competative wages. But, aren't the unions pension and benefit contracts helping to bankrupt several states?
And the state government's aren't? The government is the biggest culprit for states going bankrupt-not unions.
Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
Not all state jobs are union jobs. They still enjoy a decent safe working environment with competative wages. But, aren't the unions pension and benefit contracts helping to bankrupt several states?
And the state government's aren't? The government is the biggest culprit for states going bankrupt-not unions.
Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
And the state government's aren't? The government is the biggest culprit for states going bankrupt-not unions.
Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
Why not just renegociate the contracts? Why eliminate ther right to collective bargaining?
I'll bet there are some ways to trim the budget without eliminating workers rights.
And the state government's aren't? The government is the biggest culprit for states going bankrupt-not unions.
Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
Why not just renegociate the contracts? Why eliminate ther right to collective bargaining?
I'll bet there are some ways to trim the budget without eliminating workers rights.
A state government can kill someone (see death row). A union cannot legally kill anyone.A simple question:
Should state unions be stronger than a state government?
Why?
A state government has an obligation to its employees to provide decent, safe working conditions and a competative wage for labor. Should a state government be so strong that this simple obligation can be breached?
A state government can kill someone (see death row). A union cannot legally kill anyone.A simple question:
Should state unions be stronger than a state government?
Why?
A state government has an obligation to its employees to provide decent, safe working conditions and a competative wage for labor. Should a state government be so strong that this simple obligation can be breached?
Doesn't mean that they haven't or tired to.
Unions are running this country into the ground.NO. If the union was more powerful than the government, then the government isn't the government, the union is.
What we're seeing is what happens when anyone dares to stop them.
Not all state jobs are union jobs. They still enjoy a decent safe working environment with competative wages. But, aren't the unions pension and benefit contracts helping to bankrupt several states?
And the state government's aren't? The government is the biggest culprit for states going bankrupt-not unions.
Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
Why not just renegociate the contracts? Why eliminate ther right to collective bargaining?
I'll bet there are some ways to trim the budget without eliminating workers rights.
They've already tried. The unions said NO!!!
Union leaders for the state's teachers, health care workers and other public employees say they'll give the governor the financial concessions he wants — amounting to a pay cut of 8 percent or more — but they will stand firm on what they call union-busting proposals.
Wis. Protesters Want Gov. Walker To Compromise : NPR
So, the answer is obvious? Eliminate the right to collective bargaining and the state's budget will be in the black? You really think so?Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
Why not just renegociate the contracts? Why eliminate ther right to collective bargaining?
I'll bet there are some ways to trim the budget without eliminating workers rights.
They've already tried. The unions said NO!!!
Then, who's taxes are paying for the unfunded benefit and pension contracts? Not the unions. I never said that it was the unions alone that are doing it, but "helping" to do it. There are cuts going on throughout state budgets, but it seems the unions are "untouchable"?
Why not just renegociate the contracts? Why eliminate ther right to collective bargaining?
I'll bet there are some ways to trim the budget without eliminating workers rights.
I'm assuming that they are trimming the budget.....but there is some serious unfunded benefits that has been laid on the backs of taxpayers. The state is broke, what part of that isn't sinking in?
The unions solution is a one time renegociated contract, this is going to be a long term problem....not a 2 or 3 year contract issue.