Shame on us All

[DGS49]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

 

[Moonglow]

You are a Catholic, no?

 

[Penelope]

You are a Catholic, no?

No more like an Evangelical.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

Reactionary, authoritarian nonsense.

The notion of ‘shaming’ those with whom we disagree in an effort to compel conformity is as arrogant as it is unwarranted and wrong.

Fear of dissent and seeking punitive measures against dissent in a pointless effort to realize some idealized American past that never actually existed to begin with is ridiculous and harmful.

If there’s anything to be ashamed of it’s this sort of frightened, reactionary dross.

 

[OldLady]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

I think there have always been people who don't know any better, as my grandma used to say. Maybe 50 years ago they just stayed on their own side of the tracks more?

 

[night_son]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

This is brutal truth^^

Well expressed.

These days many shadows of truth and good hide behind the accusation of shame as cruelty when shame is the truth bared like the sharpest of teeth. So while everyone returns to their Xbox and smart phone valium, I'd just like to thank you for the courage to speak truth and be harassed for it. The tar pit the masses wallow and fossilize within is like the comfort of billions of suffering fools sticking together in its morass of profanity. Well done.

 

[BlackFlag]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

Shame is dead and buried. As a conservative, you can't complain about shame while the dotard is still in the White House.

 

[Penelope]

Shame on the man who has affairs with playboy bunnies shortly after his wife gives birth.

 

[Erinwltr]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

I think there have always been people who don't know any better, as my grandma used to say. Maybe 50 years ago they just stayed on their own side of the tracks more?

My Grandmother never said anything like that, OL.

 

[Unkotare]

....

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk......

Yes!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

It is you who should be ashamed of yourself, prancing around condemning people while cloaked in fake, divine authority. We should help people out of compassion and empathy, and people like you should be openly mocked and condemned for your magical bullshit.

 

[Unkotare]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

It is you who should be ashamed of yourself, prancing around condemning people while cloaked in fake, divine authority. We should help people out of compassion and empathy, and people like you should be openly mocked and condemned for your magical bullshit.

Magical what now?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

It is you who should be ashamed of yourself, prancing around condemning people while cloaked in fake, divine authority. We should help people out of compassion and empathy, and people like you should be openly mocked and condemned for your magical bullshit.

Magical what now?

Magical gods, magical, divine code dictated by magical gods, etc etc

 

[Unkotare]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

It is you who should be ashamed of yourself, prancing around condemning people while cloaked in fake, divine authority. We should help people out of compassion and empathy, and people like you should be openly mocked and condemned for your magical bullshit.

Magical what now?

Magical gods, magical, divine code dictated by magical gods, etc etc

Are you trying to say you’re one of those thick headed, anti-religious bigots?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

It is you who should be ashamed of yourself, prancing around condemning people while cloaked in fake, divine authority. We should help people out of compassion and empathy, and people like you should be openly mocked and condemned for your magical bullshit.

Magical what now?

Magical gods, magical, divine code dictated by magical gods, etc etc

Are you trying to say you’re one of those thick headed, anti-religious bigots?

Of course not. Are you hitting on me?

 

[Unkotare]

Somewhere along the line during the past 50 years or so, "we" as a society have decided that SHAME is an inappropriate emotion and that causing someone to feel shame, intentionally or not, is a cultural "sin," like using a disfavored word (e.g., Oriental, retarded).

So no one is ashamed of using vulgar or crude language among strangers. No is ashamed to be dressed inappropriately for a social occasion. No one is ashamed to be poorly groomed, wearing dirty or worn clothes, or to be wearing "exercise" clothes at inappropriate times and places (e.g., yoga pants to church).

It is a "sin" to say anything that might tend to make one ashamed of being fat, or lazy, or drunk.

And god help you if you say anything or even make a facial expression that might tend to make a single mother, welfare recipient, or the beneficiary of any government program uncomfortable. In fact, the very idea that there is anything to be ashamed about for being "on the dole," or having a kid out of wedlock is culturally obsolete.

There was a germ of sanity and kindness in the original thought that "shame" should not be used as a bludgeon against people, when the reason for shame was totally out of their control. You shouldn't "shame" someone for being short, or ugly, or for having worn out clothes, when that is the result of true poverty. You shouldn't shame someone for their gender, race, color, ethnicity or religion (except Mormons).

But there are things that one should be ashamed of. Few people are fat because of a medical disorder; most cases or morbid obesity are simply a manifestation of failure to control ones appetites and lifestyle. Two generations ago, obesity was rare for both rich and poor, so it ain't genetic. Failure to groom and dress appropriately is entirely within the person's control. The way we talk is entirely within our control. Even uneducated people know that there are many words that are inappropriate for general social interaction with strangers.

Having a child with no husband is usually the result of horrible decision-making at several stages of social interaction, by at least two people. And relying on Government (i.e., Everyone Else) to support you and your offspring is absolutely disgraceful conduct. No shame? Are you kidding me?

It is shameful that we have abandoned the constructive use of shame.

It is you who should be ashamed of yourself, prancing around condemning people while cloaked in fake, divine authority. We should help people out of compassion and empathy, and people like you should be openly mocked and condemned for your magical bullshit.

Magical what now?

Magical gods, magical, divine code dictated by magical gods, etc etc

Are you trying to say you’re one of those thick headed, anti-religious bigots?

Of course not. ..

You kinda sound like a bigot.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is you who should be ashamed of yourself, prancing around condemning people while cloaked in fake, divine authority. We should help people out of compassion and empathy, and people like you should be openly mocked and condemned for your magical bullshit.

Magical what now?

Magical gods, magical, divine code dictated by magical gods, etc etc

Are you trying to say you’re one of those thick headed, anti-religious bigots?

Of course not. ..

You kinda sound like a bigot.

And you sound like you are hitting on me.

 

[Unkotare]

Magical what now?

Magical gods, magical, divine code dictated by magical gods, etc etc

Are you trying to say you’re one of those thick headed, anti-religious bigots?

Of course not. ..

You kinda sound like a bigot.

And you sound like you are hitting on me.

To be funny that would have to make the slightest bit of sense, but it doesn’t. Instead, it just highlights how badly you are trying to deflect from your vile intolerant bigotry.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Magical gods, magical, divine code dictated by magical gods, etc etc

Are you trying to say you’re one of those thick headed, anti-religious bigots?

Of course not. ..

You kinda sound like a bigot.

And you sound like you are hitting on me.

To be funny that would have to make the slightest bit of sense, but it doesn’t. Instead, it just highlights how badly you are trying to deflect from your vile intolerant bigotry.

Why would I deflect? You haven't made any good argument. I am unmoved.

 

[Unkotare]

Are you trying to say you’re one of those thick headed, anti-religious bigots?

Of course not. ..

You kinda sound like a bigot.

And you sound like you are hitting on me.

To be funny that would have to make the slightest bit of sense, but it doesn’t. Instead, it just highlights how badly you are trying to deflect from your vile intolerant bigotry.

Why would I deflect? ....

Because you’re ashamed of being a bigot.