Sec State nominee Kerry- climate change top of agenda

And no amount of "encouragement" is going to stop people in other countries from growing their economies by any means available. Right now cheap energy is the best way for an economy to grow.

It makes no ecoonmic sense to destroy your own marketplace.

Most countries have a range of good energy options available to them: nuclear, natural gas, tidal, solar and wind are all sustainable forms of energy.

Coal is not.

Most countries realise this, which is why conservative parties around the world, from the UK to New Zealand, from Finland to Japan and from Argentina to Australia have climate change policies based on 21st century science.

The earth is not going to be "destroyed" if the average temperature is a few degrees warmer.

BTW no fossil fuel is a "sustainable source" they will all eventually be exhausted.
 
The Middle East plunges into uncertainty, Europen economies dives into depression, but "Climate change" -- that's the focus.

LOLz

That's why Dems get shellacked in the midterms
 
I forgot you live in Finland..So we are suppose to be the "climate police" of the world?

No, you're supposed to do what it best for America and the American people.

Denying science and pretending that the climate is doing just fine is not a solution that serves those interests - and neither is investing in coal.

I see Kerry's role as more one of working with other countries: offering advice, sharing information, and finding common solutions. I'm not sure why anyone would be against that.

Nobody is "denying Science" because AGW has nothing to do with science
 
No, you're supposed to do what it best for America and the American people.

Denying science and pretending that the climate is doing just fine is not a solution that serves those interests - and neither is investing in coal.

Science has been wrong before and is not the be all to end all
but you want to worship them and live your life around them, fine

So, if they are wrong and we clean up the environment will will have -

a clean environment.

If they are right and we do nothing, we will have -

ruin.

short-term profit is more important to repubs than having a long-term habitable planet, yes.
 
We just had an Ambassador murdered on American soil in an embassy in Libya and three other people killed including two former Navy Seals and the new secretary of state appointed by Obama pledges "a greater cultural understanding of the developing world". Why am I not surprised?
 
It's no longer about climate change, the terminology has made a subtle shift. It's about climate control. Doomed to failure. obama actually believes that he can control hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards and earthquakes. Kerry will reinforce that error because it brings him some political force. They are fools, but what else is new.

Kerry is perfect for the job of Secretary of State. He will bring obama's foolsihness to the world stage making the US even more irrelevant than it is now.
 
It's no longer about climate change, the terminology has made a subtle shift. It's about climate control. Doomed to failure. obama actually believes that he can control hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards and earthquakes. Kerry will reinforce that error because it brings him some political force. They are fools, but what else is new.

Kerry is perfect for the job of Secretary of State. He will bring obama's foolsihness to the world stage making the US even more irrelevant than it is now.

Your wrong.... Were as your correct it is about control it isn't the weather Obama thinks he should control but us..... Like gun control it is all about being able to guide us into the socialist utopia.....This is why so many communists are Eco-terrorists now.
 
It's not "ManMade Global Warming" any longer, it's Climate Change, that's how you can tell it has nothing to do with science
 
obama's changes might end up so painful to the people with no improvement, that this whole travesty will crash. For that, Kerry is optimal.
 
The earth is not going to be "destroyed" if the average temperature is a few degrees warmer.

No it isn't. And no one on this thread suggested that it would be, did they?

So who are you arguing with?

Maybe you should read some of the warmists posts before you make such a blanket statement. Rocks, konradv, rolling thunder and a few others are quite convinced that the earth is presently at the optimum climate and a change of 2 degrees will be devastating. The press also bemoans the catastrophic consequences of a 2 or 3 degree rise.
 
It is amazing that every single one of the ENVIRONMENTAL forum lurkers has the political IQ of a handball ( Old Rocks is the exception).

The chances of any kind of significant climate change legislation is ZERO.........all has to do with the GOP governors redistricting efforts since 2010. Many House Dems now sit on a fence in terms of consistuents.......there is no way they are voting to slam thier constituents with much higher electric bills. Its quite that simple. Liberals might think their president is a king. Hes not.............shit like this has to be approved by the House. ZERO chance s0ns.

Dont take my word for it..........spend some time googling it and find out.
 
It's not "ManMade Global Warming" any longer, it's Climate Change, that's how you can tell it has nothing to do with science

Frank -

Please try and post with a little maturity.

There are around 60 major international science organisations in the world - of those, some 59 back human acitivity as playing a part in climate change.

Hence, your endless whining that "it isn't science" is simply childish and dishonest.

You are free to hold whatever opinions you like - however laiming that you are on the side of scientific opiniong is not an honest statement.
 
It's not "ManMade Global Warming" any longer, it's Climate Change, that's how you can tell it has nothing to do with science

Frank -

Please try and post with a little maturity.

There are around 60 major international science organisations in the world - of those, some 59 back human acitivity as playing a part in climate change.

Hence, your endless whining that "it isn't science" is simply childish and dishonest.

You are free to hold whatever opinions you like - however laiming that you are on the side of scientific opiniong is not an honest statement.

How is publishing lies science?
 
All the government has to do to get favorable climate change studies is pay for results. Dozens of scientists will produce studies proving climate change. That's what they are paid to do.
 
Katz -

I'm sure you don't believe that any more than I do - but how do you explain the thousands of pieces of researhc conducted under conditions in which money was not an issue?
 
Katz -

I'm sure you don't believe that any more than I do - but how do you explain the thousands of pieces of researhc conducted under conditions in which money was not an issue?

You are not all there are you????? Perhaps you forgot about the email leaks of these scientist saying precisely what Kats said?
 

Forum List

Back
Top