School has brutal reply after Muslim issues threat over daughters lunch

[Call Sign Chaos]

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot .

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Just like you keep doing in this thread.

Just because you are an atheist doesn't make you less of a religious bigot.

Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.

National Socialism doesn't kill people, people use National Socialism to kill people....fucking moron.

 

[Syriusly]

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot .

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Just like you keep doing in this thread.

Just because you are an atheist doesn't make you less of a religious bigot.

Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.

National Socialism doesn't kill people, people use National Socialism to kill people....fucking moron.

Yep- National Socialism doesn't kill people- which is why the American NAZI party is legal in the United States- until one of those assholes acts like you and threatens violence.

 

[Picaro]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

More rubbish, like your 'source' for the Cathar debacle was some guy who wasn't even born at the time. .

So you are saying that a Christian lied to the Pope?

Arnaud-Amaury wrote to Pope Innocent III, "Today your Holiness, twenty thousand heretics were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex."

Arnaud Amalric - Wikipedia

Arnaud Amalric (Latin: Arnoldus Amalricus; died 1225) was a Cistercian abbot who played a prominent role in the Albigensian Crusade. He is remembered for purportedly advising a soldier who was worried about killing orthodox Catholics instead of just heretic Cathars, prior to the sack of Béziers, to simply kill everyone, as God would sort it all out later.

In 1204, he was named a papal legate and inquisitor and was sent by Innocent III with Peter of Castelnau and Arnoul to attempt the conversion of the Albigensians. Failing in this, he distinguished himself by the zeal with which he incited men by his preaching to the crusade against them. He was in charge of the crusader army that sacked Béziers in 1209.[2]

Arnaud himself, in a letter to the Pope in August 1209 (col.139), wrote:

.while discussions were still going on with the barons about the release of those in the city who were deemed to be Catholics, the servants and other persons of low rank and unarmed attacked the city without waiting for orders from their leaders. To our amazement, crying "to arms, to arms!", within the space of two or three hours they crossed the ditches and the walls and Béziers was taken. Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[5]

Tell me again about how this guy wasn't even born when Beziers was sacked......tell us more...lol

Ah more fake news from the 13th century. lol

 

[Picaro]

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot but I see right through your false equivalence apologetic defenses for Islam, you are no better than a advocate for National Socialism.

I'm an agnostic myself. These tards are just mentally ill and hate Xians because they oppose harmful sexual fetishes favored by sickos, is all.

You are the one agreeing with the asshole who is promoting killing Muslims in America.

I am the one supporting the Constitution- and Freedom of Religion.

I am okay with that.

now the tard resorts to the usual lying about what was said. Typical, along with the ridiculous 'personal anecdotes' and other rubbish.

 

[Syriusly]

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot but I see right through your false equivalence apologetic defenses for Islam, you are no better than a advocate for National Socialism.

I'm an agnostic myself. These tards are just mentally ill and hate Xians because they oppose harmful sexual fetishes favored by sickos, is all.

You are the one agreeing with the asshole who is promoting killing Muslims in America.

I am the one supporting the Constitution- and Freedom of Religion.

I am okay with that.

now the tard resorts to the usual lying about what was said. Typical, along with the ridiculous 'personal anecdotes' and other rubbish.

You truly are the Prince of Lies- continue on with your support of the contard who keeps threatening Americans with violence- because of their religion.

 

[Syriusly]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

More rubbish, like your 'source' for the Cathar debacle was some guy who wasn't even born at the time. .

So you are saying that a Christian lied to the Pope?

Arnaud-Amaury wrote to Pope Innocent III, "Today your Holiness, twenty thousand heretics were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex."

Arnaud Amalric - Wikipedia

Arnaud Amalric (Latin: Arnoldus Amalricus; died 1225) was a Cistercian abbot who played a prominent role in the Albigensian Crusade. He is remembered for purportedly advising a soldier who was worried about killing orthodox Catholics instead of just heretic Cathars, prior to the sack of Béziers, to simply kill everyone, as God would sort it all out later.

In 1204, he was named a papal legate and inquisitor and was sent by Innocent III with Peter of Castelnau and Arnoul to attempt the conversion of the Albigensians. Failing in this, he distinguished himself by the zeal with which he incited men by his preaching to the crusade against them. He was in charge of the crusader army that sacked Béziers in 1209.[2]

Arnaud himself, in a letter to the Pope in August 1209 (col.139), wrote:

.while discussions were still going on with the barons about the release of those in the city who were deemed to be Catholics, the servants and other persons of low rank and unarmed attacked the city without waiting for orders from their leaders. To our amazement, crying "to arms, to arms!", within the space of two or three hours they crossed the ditches and the walls and Béziers was taken. Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[5]

Tell me again about how this guy wasn't even born when Beziers was sacked......tell us more...lol

Ah more fake news from the 13th century. lol

Not sure why you call Christians from the 13th century 'fake'

So you are saying that a Christian lied to the Pope?

Arnaud-Amaury wrote to Pope Innocent III, "Today your Holiness, twenty thousand heretics were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex."

Arnaud Amalric - Wikipedia

Arnaud Amalric (Latin: Arnoldus Amalricus; died 1225) was a Cistercian abbot who played a prominent role in the Albigensian Crusade. He is remembered for purportedly advising a soldier who was worried about killing orthodox Catholics instead of just heretic Cathars, prior to the sack of Béziers, to simply kill everyone, as God would sort it all out later.

In 1204, he was named a papal legate and inquisitor and was sent by Innocent III with Peter of Castelnau and Arnoul to attempt the conversion of the Albigensians. Failing in this, he distinguished himself by the zeal with which he incited men by his preaching to the crusade against them. He was in charge of the crusader army that sacked Béziers in 1209.[2]

Arnaud himself, in a letter to the Pope in August 1209 (col.139), wrote:

.while discussions were still going on with the barons about the release of those in the city who were deemed to be Catholics, the servants and other persons of low rank and unarmed attacked the city without waiting for orders from their leaders. To our amazement, crying "to arms, to arms!", within the space of two or three hours they crossed the ditches and the walls and Béziers was taken. Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[5]

Tell me again about how this guy wasn't even born when Beziers was sacked......tell us more...lol

 

[Picaro]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

You can't make such discernments because you have no education or the critical thinking skills to use one if you had one.

Big talk from a little man.

I don't doubt it looks that way to your tiny little brain; pretty much all easily demonstrable facts have that effect on shills and astro-turfers peddling left wing propaganda. Wear your Rainbow burhka proudly; it will look great on camera when your 'poor hapless victims' get around to tossing you and your fellow tards off skyscrapers and the like.

 

[Syriusly]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

You can't make such discernments because you have no education or the critical thinking skills to use one if you had one.

Big talk from a little man.

I don't doubt i.

Little tiny, tiny man.

 

[Picaro]

Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.

True, and that''s why Islam isn't a religion; it demands death of all who don't submit to the Caliphate. It's a political ideology, not a religion. This is what makes it so appealing to the mentally ill, particularly homosexuals and other sociopaths, and as an ideology based on criminal activity, it dictates death to any who leave the crime family. It's the perfect organized crime syndicate philosophy.

 

[Picaro]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

You can't make such discernments because you have no education or the critical thinking skills to use one if you had one.

Big talk from a little man.

I don't doubt i.

Little tiny, tiny man.

oh boo woo woo. lol reduced to nothing.

 

[Coyote]

View attachment 126220

Tucson Muslim family claims school is serving their child pork



View attachment 126221

View attachment 126219

School Has Brutal Reply After Muslim Issues Threat Over Daughter's Lunch

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The bottom meme says it all for those who know this is America. Don't try and change our Country or our ways into your ways. If your ways are so great wth did you leave your country for.

So...umh...what if the Muslim IS an American? Did that occur to you?

And while you're at it, don't forget to scream at the parents that want a kosher lunch for their kids and tell them to quite trying to change our Country or our ways into their ways!

Other than that - the parent is being a real pill. She should pack a lunch for her kid.

 

[irosie91]

View attachment 126220

Tucson Muslim family claims school is serving their child pork



View attachment 126221

View attachment 126219

School Has Brutal Reply After Muslim Issues Threat Over Daughter's Lunch\

gee coyote----you really LOVE TO SLING THE MOSQUE SHIT-----you got a link
to jewish parents DEMANDING kosher lunches for their kids in public schools?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The bottom meme says it all for those who know this is America. Don't try and change our Country or our ways into your ways. If your ways are so great wth did you leave your country for.

So...umh...what if the Muslim IS an American? Did that occur to you?

And while you're at it, don't forget to scream at the parents that want a kosher lunch for their kids and tell them to quite trying to change our Country or our ways into their ways!

Other than that - the parent is being a real pill. She should pack a lunch for her kid.

 

[EverCurious]

Not because of religion. Because their just assholes... Bad leaders, leading their sheep down bad paths. They harm others in all aspects of human existence, from religion, to politics, to business.

I agree- not because of religion- assholes use religion to murder people.

The vast majority of Christians and Jews and Muslims and Hindus etc want nothing more than to live a good life taking care of their family- the assholes work to incite others to violence because of religion.

Like Chaosboy here.

I agree to a point, but at the same time Muslims need to understand that their views on women and homosexuals will /not/ be tolerated by American laws and values of freedom. As long as they can "let go" those incompatible parts of their religious doctrines then I have no fucks to give. IF however they cannot, and that includes within their communities, then we have problems. I am not going to tolerate having sections of the country being dangerous for gays or uncovered women, and shit like that. I don't care if they take over a city or not, it's against the laws of this nation and therefore cannot exist here.

'views on women and homosexuals'- i would hope you feel that way about anyone who holds those views on women and homosexuals- Christians and Muslims- and atheists alike.

I completely disagree with the orthodox religious view of homosexuality in Islam- and in Christianity- but as long as Christians and Muslims do not advocate violence, or breaking the law and the Constitution- then their opinions are protected.

I will point out- that it was not Muslims who made homosexuality illegal in the United States- it was Christians who believed that homosexuality was behavior that should be made illegal- because of their religious beliefs- and until the Supreme Court determined that such laws were illegal, homosexuals were being tossed in jail for the crime of having consensual sex.

I oppose anyone attempting to impose their religious views on others- and I also oppose those who try to deny the Constitutional rights of the religious.

Mainstream Christians have adapted their views, over 30 years ago in my experience. While we still have some points to work out on business public relations and laws, and maybe a bit more work on the whole sticky SSM issue (sanctity issues, idk why we can't just cut n paste "or civil union" in all the damn paperwork so everyone is happy personally,) there are none I know who advocate jailing, much less killing, homosexuals. (And I know a lot of them, there's like 50 Christian churches in my city of 40k) .

Yes- there has been a huge sea change in the last 30 years- but there are still those who are willing to advocate making homosexuality illegal- not as many- because frankly public opinion has shifted so dramatically that that position is now not publicly tenable.

I don't know of any Muslims in the United States who are advocating anything against gays. They are not on the forefront of the battle against SSM, or against gay couples adopting(the current battle de jure)- and they are not the ones fighting to be exempted from business laws which require serving gay customers. That would all be members of the Christian community.

My daughter goes to a public school with a large Muslim minority- something like 15% Muslim- and they get along with(and some are part) of the schools gay community. There is no friction between the Muslims and gays at the school- there are other frictions for other things- but in the U.S.- gay is not a Muslim issue.

I went to school in a state that is still (25 years after my graduation) 70% Christian. I was blatantly bisexual and yet I was only once targeted with religious contempt for kissing a girl in the hallway after lunch - that idiot was promptly shut down by my peers in the school. If anything my Christian buddies regard me with curiosity, some claim concern for my eternal soul, but I've never felt rejected nor had any fear. In fact they've been behind me even while some of their parents denounced me.

(*Though, to be completely fair, the most vocal opponent I had in town was very active in the church community and she had a decent reason. I was "defiling" her son who she expect to become a priest, well pastor cause there's a difference. [Priest just sounds more amusing to me.] To this day he says that God decided I couldn't steal his entire soul, and I joke that he best mind his words or I'll consider it a challenge. - He's an audio technician "on the side" I guess you'd say, he randomly ended up helping me install the surround system in the theater when we moved into the house here a decade ago so we ended up back in touch with each other.)

 

[EverCurious]

[
I also have to say that I'm not in the slightest encouraged by the rhetoric from some claiming they'll just out breed us and take over our social/political/cultural and out vote us. I will /not/ live under their rules. I will die before I convert. Thus I feel compelled to resist all things that I feel trends in that direction..

The only people I have seen making statements like that are the rightwingers yelling "The Mooslims are coming- the Mooslims are coming".

The Constitution protects us all- you will not live long enough to see Muslims be even 15% of our population. But resist away any actual attempts to impose religions on the public. Nothing wrong with that.

Actually no, it's supported by the Koran and I've heard many of their own priests (Imam) say that is the plan. While many of them to not plan it as an attack as the far right extremists purport, they do indeed think it's necessary to "out-breed" so they can implement their religious rule in whatever nations they immigrate to. Even if it's not a "hostile attack" or "intended attack." I still consider it a threat to American freedom. I cannot support them taking over this nation, even if it's done "peacefully." As I said, I will die before I convert to Islam. We need to fix the ME and send them home so they can have their political/religious beliefs without infringing upon "Western" freedoms.

 

[Gracie]

 

[irosie91]

[
I also have to say that I'm not in the slightest encouraged by the rhetoric from some claiming they'll just out breed us and take over our social/political/cultural and out vote us. I will /not/ live under their rules. I will die before I convert. Thus I feel compelled to resist all things that I feel trends in that direction..

The only people I have seen making statements like that are the rightwingers yelling "The Mooslims are coming- the Mooslims are coming".

The Constitution protects us all- you will not live long enough to see Muslims be even 15% of our population. But resist away any actual attempts to impose religions on the public. Nothing wrong with that.

Actually no, it's supported by the Koran and I've heard many of their own priests (Imam) say that is the plan. While many of them to not plan it as an attack as the far right extremists purport, they do indeed think it's necessary to "out-breed" so they can implement their religious rule in whatever nations they immigrate to. Even if it's not a "hostile attack" or "intended attack." I still consider it a threat to American freedom. I cannot support them taking over this nation, even if it's done "peacefully." As I said, I will die before I convert to Islam. We need to fix the ME and send them home so they can have their political/religious beliefs without infringing upon "Western" freedoms.

You do not understand----muslims are ACTIVELY TAUGHT-----that ALL PEOPLE
SHOULD BE MUSLIM-------and even if you become muslim by FORCE----or even enslavement-----you are far better off than being "not muslim" If you are a good
and intelligent person you will come to understand that FACT. If you are hopelessly stupid or VERY EVIL -----you may not understand THE FACT. I have known highly educated and seemingly good and intelligent people who TRULY BELIEVE----with the kind of faith exhibited by four year old Christian children who believe in Santa Clause-----that the PERFECTION AND BEAUTY OF ISLAM is self-evident to ALL INTELLIGENT AND GOOD PEOPLE

 

[EverCurious]

I do understand that, I think it's a bit over-blown by hysterics, but I understand. Which is why I say I'd rather they stayed in their own nations, then they can live as their God wishes them to, none of my business.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot .

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Just like you keep doing in this thread.

Just because you are an atheist doesn't make you less of a religious bigot.

Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.

National Socialism doesn't kill people, people use National Socialism to kill people....fucking moron.

Yep- National Socialism doesn't kill people- which is why the American NAZI party is legal in the United States- until one of those assholes acts like you and threatens violence.

The Koran and Hadiths threaten and mandate violence.

 

[irosie91]

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot .

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Just like you keep doing in this thread.

Just because you are an atheist doesn't make you less of a religious bigot.

Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.

National Socialism doesn't kill people, people use National Socialism to kill people....fucking moron.

Yep- National Socialism doesn't kill people- which is why the American NAZI party is legal in the United States- until one of those assholes acts like you and threatens violence.

The Koran and Hadiths threaten and mandate violence.

yes----the scriptural writings and the rantings of the ummah do have a SIGNATURE STYLE

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.

True, and that''s why Islam isn't a religion; it demands death of all who don't submit to the Caliphate. It's a political ideology, not a religion. This is what makes it so appealing to the mentally ill, particularly homosexuals and other sociopaths, and as an ideology based on criminal activity, it dictates death to any who leave the crime family. It's the perfect organized crime syndicate philosophy.

When the murderous warlord created it, the entire purpose was to guarantee his warriors would be bound to his will and continue to rape, murder and pillage their way through the region. All he did was to borrow bits and pieces of true religions, grafted it on to his agenda of hatred and voila'!

Islam is a totalitarian, supremacist ideology that demands eternal war by its followers until all submit before it. That we call this evil screed a religion prevents us for seeing it for what it is because of our excessive deference for religion in general. We don't do that for any other type of ideology, just religion. Since we call it a religion, however, those lacking in intelligence, education or common sense indulge in their various childish defenses by treating it as if it were no different than Christianity. These utter morons only do it because they have trained each other to do it, and will go to the most ridiculous extremes in trying to paint them the same in order to defend Islam.

"Oh, you tell me Mohammad ordered his followers to rape women in front of their captive husbands before killing the men? But, but, but, but I just saw a Christian jaywalk the other day!