School has brutal reply after Muslim issues threat over daughters lunch

[Picaro]

Witch burning was a pagan pastime. The crime of 'witchcraft' covered a lot of crimes, usually poisoning and other forms of murder, and most 'burnings' took place during the Enlightenment, not the per-Renaissance centuries; the so-called 'Enlightenment' wasn't as 'Enlightening' as is widely claimed.

There was also a strong regional pattern to them, mostly areas where the peasantry was still mostly illiterate and superstitious, holding on to their local pagan traditions, as some still do to this day. In any case, there fewer than 12,000 of them over some a period of a 1,000 years. Most of the hysterical drivel about them comes from anti-Catholic Protestant propaganda; if as many people were killed as was claimed, including 'witch burnings', Inquisitions, and the rest, Europe would have a population of maybe 5 today. The numbers are so way over the top absurd on their face only idiots still believe them.

So, over some 1,300 years, from 500 A.D. to the end of the 18th century, all the big noises about the Evul Xian Bloodbath amounts to maybe 25,000, most of it related to local politics, hysteria, and nothing to do with Christianity. Jewish pogroms against Christians killed far more than that before 100 A.D.

So are Christmas trees and rabbits at Easter, but Christians practice them.

ISIS and Islamic Jihadists, without a doubt, are the most largest and most barbaric religious fanatics in the 21st Century, but it's a lie to say Christians haven't, or don't, practice barbaric things themselves. The differences are in degrees and numbers, not whether or not they do it. Unlike the Islamophobes, I'm not advocating banning any religion nor executing anyone for believing. In fact I support people becoming more spiritually aware. What I'm against is anyone who uses religion to harm others. Those assholes need to be neutralized.

Dumb comparison. Try reading the Koran and a few of the Hadiths, and get back to us after you actually know a few things about the vast differences between Christianity and Islam. You;re just throwing out nonsense trying to claim a similarity between them. We already know Syriously is just a spammer with zero knowledge, so at least try to have a better game than Syriously's, which is all rubbish, all the time.

 

[HenryBHough]

We could do a lot to make America a safer place by stationing a pig at each port of entry. Kiss the pig or go home.

 

[Syriusly]

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Not because of religion. Because their just assholes... Bad leaders, leading their sheep down bad paths. They harm others in all aspects of human existence, from religion, to politics, to business.

I agree- not because of religion- assholes use religion to murder people.

The vast majority of Christians and Jews and Muslims and Hindus etc want nothing more than to live a good life taking care of their family- the assholes work to incite others to violence because of religion.

Like Chaosboy here.

I agree to a point, but at the same time Muslims need to understand that their views on women and homosexuals will /not/ be tolerated by American laws and values of freedom. As long as they can "let go" those incompatible parts of their religious doctrines then I have no fucks to give. IF however they cannot, and that includes within their communities, then we have problems. I am not going to tolerate having sections of the country being dangerous for gays or uncovered women, and shit like that. I don't care if they take over a city or not, it's against the laws of this nation and therefore cannot exist here.

'views on women and homosexuals'- i would hope you feel that way about anyone who holds those views on women and homosexuals- Christians and Muslims- and atheists alike.

I completely disagree with the orthodox religious view of homosexuality in Islam- and in Christianity- but as long as Christians and Muslims do not advocate violence, or breaking the law and the Constitution- then their opinions are protected.

I will point out- that it was not Muslims who made homosexuality illegal in the United States- it was Christians who believed that homosexuality was behavior that should be made illegal- because of their religious beliefs- and until the Supreme Court determined that such laws were illegal, homosexuals were being tossed in jail for the crime of having consensual sex.

I oppose anyone attempting to impose their religious views on others- and I also oppose those who try to deny the Constitutional rights of the religious.

Mainstream Christians have adapted their views, over 30 years ago in my experience. While we still have some points to work out on business public relations and laws, and maybe a bit more work on the whole sticky SSM issue (sanctity issues, idk why we can't just cut n paste "or civil union" in all the damn paperwork so everyone is happy personally,) there are none I know who advocate jailing, much less killing, homosexuals. (And I know a lot of them, there's like 50 Christian churches in my city of 40k) .

Yes- there has been a huge sea change in the last 30 years- but there are still those who are willing to advocate making homosexuality illegal- not as many- because frankly public opinion has shifted so dramatically that that position is now not publicly tenable.

I don't know of any Muslims in the United States who are advocating anything against gays. They are not on the forefront of the battle against SSM, or against gay couples adopting(the current battle de jure)- and they are not the ones fighting to be exempted from business laws which require serving gay customers. That would all be members of the Christian community.

My daughter goes to a public school with a large Muslim minority- something like 15% Muslim- and they get along with(and some are part) of the schools gay community. There is no friction between the Muslims and gays at the school- there are other frictions for other things- but in the U.S.- gay is not a Muslim issue.

 

[Syriusly]

We could do a lot to make America a safer place by stationing a pig at each port of entry. Kiss the pig or go home.

Henry has a pig fetish.

 

[Syriusly]

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Not because of religion. Because their just assholes... Bad leaders, leading their sheep down bad paths. They harm others in all aspects of human existence, from religion, to politics, to business.

I agree- not because of religion- assholes use religion to murder people.

The vast majority of Christians and Jews and Muslims and Hindus etc want nothing more than to live a good life taking care of their family- the assholes work to incite others to violence because of religion.

Like Chaosboy here.

I agree to a point, but at the same time Muslims need to understand that their views on women and homosexuals will /not/ be tolerated by American laws and values of freedom. As long as they can "let go" those incompatible parts of their religious doctrines then I have no fucks to give. IF however they cannot, and that includes within their communities, then we have problems. I am not going to tolerate having sections of the country being dangerous for gays or uncovered women, and shit like that. I don't care if they take over a city or not, it's against the laws of this nation and therefore cannot exist here.

'views on women and homosexuals'- i would hope you feel that way about anyone who holds those views on women and homosexuals- Christians and Muslims- and atheists alike.

I completely disagree with the orthodox religious view of homosexuality in Islam- and in Christianity- but as long as Christians and Muslims do not advocate violence, or breaking the law and the Constitution- then their opinions are protected.

I will point out- that it was not Muslims who made homosexuality illegal in the United States- it was Christians who believed that homosexuality was behavior that should be made illegal- because of their religious beliefs- and until the Supreme Court determined that such laws were illegal, homosexuals were being tossed in jail for the crime of having consensual sex.

I oppose anyone attempting to impose their religious views on others- and I also oppose those who try to deny the Constitutional rights of the religious.

Ultimately religions have to balance the freedoms of this nation with their religious doctrine. I won't make any exceptions for Muslims "religious rights." The down side for them is that they seem to have a lot more compromising to do because their religion is so socially/politically entrenched. I think it's a problem, not insurmountable in my opinion, but I do think they should be more vocal in their acceptance that they're going to have to let some stuff go. .

I don't see any reason to make any 'exceptions for anyone's religious rights. Everyone has to follow the law- regardless of their religion. But the law cannot discriminate against people because of their religion.

I look forward to the day that members of religions publicly let 'some stuff go'- having Christians and Muslims all publicly all agree that God says that Gays are all sinners condemned to hell would be a great thing to have happen. But I do not demand that of any religion. Just don't push for laws discriminating against gays.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Oooh, dude. I thought I was special when you used that same bullshit with me. Of course, I proved you wrong in later posts including pointing out how your advocation to murder innocent Americans is anti-Constitutional.

You proved nothing, please explain how yiur defense of Islam is any different from defending National Socialism,

Islam is a religion- and like all religions is protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution- regardless of whatever crazy crap is in any of your holy books- you have the right in America to worship as you will- so long as you do not break the law- or advocate breaking the law.

I defend all religions from religious bigots like you.

National Socialism- German Nationalism- was a political ideology- not a religion- and not protected by the First Amendment. But even Nazi's in America have their speech protected- so long as they don't advocate violence or breaking the law.

Now compare- in this thread- it is not followers of Islam advocating violence against Americans- it is not followers of Islam advocating pissing on the Constitution- that would be you.

I don't defend you acting like a good little Fascist.

Your answer could have been a lot shorter, you defend the anti-Semitic, genocidal, totalitarian ideology claims ideology of Islam because it claims to be ordained by an invisible sky daddy, you sir are the fucking Nazi and a traitor to liberal democracy and western civilization as well. The Koran and Hadiths absolutely advocate violence and violations of the law including but not limited to child rape, torture, and murder you dumb little fuck.

 

[Syriusly]

[
I also have to say that I'm not in the slightest encouraged by the rhetoric from some claiming they'll just out breed us and take over our social/political/cultural and out vote us. I will /not/ live under their rules. I will die before I convert. Thus I feel compelled to resist all things that I feel trends in that direction..

The only people I have seen making statements like that are the rightwingers yelling "The Mooslims are coming- the Mooslims are coming".

The Constitution protects us all- you will not live long enough to see Muslims be even 15% of our population. But resist away any actual attempts to impose religions on the public. Nothing wrong with that.

 

[Syriusly]

Less people were killed during the hundreds of years of the inquisition than were killed on 9-11.

The Roman Inquisition executed no one after the Cathars debacle,

I like that "Cathars' debacle"- is that like the 9/11 debacle?

is reply, recalled by Caesarius of Heisterbach, a fellow Cistercian, thirty years later was "Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius"—"Kill them all, the Lord will recognise His own".[61][62] The doors of the church of St Mary Magdalene were broken down and the refugees dragged out and slaughtered. Reportedly at least 7,000 innocent men, women and children were killed there by Christian forces. Elsewhere in the town, many more thousands were mutilated and killed. Prisoners were blinded, dragged behind horses, and used for target practice.[63] What remained of the city was razed by fire. Arnaud-Amaury wrote to Pope Innocent III, "Today your Holiness, twenty thousand heretics were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex."[64][65]

Friday, May 13 1239, 183 Cathars, men and women, were delivered to the flames of the bonfire lit on the flanks of Mont-Aimé in Champagne

From May 1243 to March 1244, the Cathar fortress of Montségur was besieged by the troops of the seneschal of Carcassonne and the archbishop of Narbonne.[71] On 16 March 1244, a large and symbolically important massacre took place, where over 200 Cathar Perfects were burnt in an enormous pyre at the prat dels cremats ("field of the burned") near the foot of the castle.[71

Of course that was just one of many of the 'debacles' Christians in France waged in the name of Christianity.

Tell us more how the Christians of the era were so much better than the Muslims.

Rubbish. '20 thousand', eh? lol

The Cathars started a 'shooting' war, and lost, simple stuff, the King of France ended it. there was no horde of fanatic priests descending on hapless innocent hobbit like peasants and slaughtering them in their beds..

Are you saying that a good Christian lied to the Pope?

Arnaud-Amaury wrote to Pope Innocent III, "Today your Holiness, twenty thousand heretics were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex."

The Cathars killed a papal legate- and were wiped out. They were killed, or forcibly converted, or driven out of France.

All good Christian fun

Friday, May 13 1239, 183 Cathars, men and women, were delivered to the flames of the bonfire lit on the flanks of Mont-Aimé in Champagne.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

This speech is not protected,

Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing... but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun(the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"(Translation is from the Noble Quran)

Not only does it call for imminent violence but the likelihood that the result will be imminent violence is proven conclusively by the tens of thousands of violent actions which it has inspired!

$20 says I can find similar barbarisms in the Holy Bible. Are you a Christian? I know you're not a Jew because you love Nazis.

I love Nazis?

You love the behavior of the Nazi's and want the United States to act like the Nazi's. I doubt you actually love anyone.

You're the one defending Islam

When did I defend Islam? I have no love of Islam.

I believe in the Constitution- and freedom of religion- and you do not.

Muslims, and Christians and Hindus and Mormons and Jews- and even you have the right to follow any crazy ass religion you want so long as you do not break the law, or advocate violence or violation of the Constitution.

All of which you do- and not a single Muslim in this thread has done.

The Koran and Hadiths advocate the duty to commit imminent violence, they fail the clear and probable danger test, they are not protected by the 1st amendment, and the only religion you ever advocate for in any thread is Islam so spare us your fucking lies.

 

[Syriusly]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Oh certainly I do.

Oh no you don't.

From the Northern Crusades- to the wars of the Reformation- to the St. Bartholomew's day massacre- to the sack of Constantinople by the Crusaders.

lol at the tired old 'Crusades' mythology. Ignore a few hundred years of Islmao-vermin rampaging around, then snivel about the defensive wars that followed,. Trulu stupid..

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot but I see right through your false equivalence apologetic defenses for Islam, you are no better than a advocate for National Socialism.

 

[Syriusly]

$20 says I can find similar barbarisms in the Holy Bible. Are you a Christian? I know you're not a Jew because you love Nazis.

I love Nazis?

You love the behavior of the Nazi's and want the United States to act like the Nazi's. I doubt you actually love anyone.

You're the one defending Islam

When did I defend Islam? I have no love of Islam.

I believe in the Constitution- and freedom of religion- and you do not.

Muslims, and Christians and Hindus and Mormons and Jews- and even you have the right to follow any crazy ass religion you want so long as you do not break the law, or advocate violence or violation of the Constitution.

All of which you do- and not a single Muslim in this thread has done.

The Koran and Hadiths advocate the duty .

When did I defend Islam? I have no love of Islam.

I believe in the Constitution- and freedom of religion- and you do not.

Muslims, and Christians and Hindus and Mormons and Jews- and even you have the right to follow any crazy ass religion you want so long as you do not break the law, or advocate violence or violation of the Constitution.

You are the only one here who has threatened violence.

Not a single Muslim in this thread has done.

 

[Syriusly]

Oh certainly I do.

Oh no you don't.

From the Northern Crusades- to the wars of the Reformation- to the St. Bartholomew's day massacre- to the sack of Constantinople by the Crusaders.

lol at the tired old 'Crusades' mythology. Ignore a few hundred years of Islmao-vermin rampaging around, then snivel about the defensive wars that followed,. Trulu stupid..

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot .

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Just like you keep doing in this thread.

Just because you are an atheist doesn't make you less of a religious bigot.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

Oh no you don't.

lol at the tired old 'Crusades' mythology. Ignore a few hundred years of Islmao-vermin rampaging around, then snivel about the defensive wars that followed,. Trulu stupid..

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Not because of religion. Because their just assholes... Bad leaders, leading their sheep down bad paths. They harm others in all aspects of human existence, from religion, to politics, to business.

I agree- not because of religion- assholes use religion to murder people.

The vast majority of Christians and Jews and Muslims and Hindus etc want nothing more than to live a good life taking care of their family- the assholes work to incite others to violence because of religion.

Like Chaosboy here.

Lying sack of shit, the overwhelming majority of Muslims (90%+) are homophobic, misogynistic, anti-Semitic, and theocratic with large percentages supporting honor killings and terrorist organizations; such as, AQ and Hamas.

 

[Picaro]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

More rubbish, like your 'source' for the Cathar debacle was some guy who wasn't even born at the time. This is again a political war, not a 'religious' war. You can't make such discernments because you have no education or the critical thinking skills to use one if you had one.

 

[Picaro]

Oh certainly I do.

Oh no you don't.

From the Northern Crusades- to the wars of the Reformation- to the St. Bartholomew's day massacre- to the sack of Constantinople by the Crusaders.

lol at the tired old 'Crusades' mythology. Ignore a few hundred years of Islmao-vermin rampaging around, then snivel about the defensive wars that followed,. Trulu stupid..

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot but I see right through your false equivalence apologetic defenses for Islam, you are no better than a advocate for National Socialism.

I'm an agnostic myself. These tards are just mentally ill and hate Xians because they oppose harmful sexual fetishes favored by sickos, is all.

 

[Syriusly]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

More rubbish, like your 'source' for the Cathar debacle was some guy who wasn't even born at the time. .

So you are saying that a Christian lied to the Pope?

Arnaud-Amaury wrote to Pope Innocent III, "Today your Holiness, twenty thousand heretics were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex."

Arnaud Amalric - Wikipedia

Arnaud Amalric (Latin: Arnoldus Amalricus; died 1225) was a Cistercian abbot who played a prominent role in the Albigensian Crusade. He is remembered for purportedly advising a soldier who was worried about killing orthodox Catholics instead of just heretic Cathars, prior to the sack of Béziers, to simply kill everyone, as God would sort it all out later.

In 1204, he was named a papal legate and inquisitor and was sent by Innocent III with Peter of Castelnau and Arnoul to attempt the conversion of the Albigensians. Failing in this, he distinguished himself by the zeal with which he incited men by his preaching to the crusade against them. He was in charge of the crusader army that sacked Béziers in 1209.[2]

Arnaud himself, in a letter to the Pope in August 1209 (col.139), wrote:

.while discussions were still going on with the barons about the release of those in the city who were deemed to be Catholics, the servants and other persons of low rank and unarmed attacked the city without waiting for orders from their leaders. To our amazement, crying "to arms, to arms!", within the space of two or three hours they crossed the ditches and the walls and Béziers was taken. Our men spared no one, irrespective of rank, sex or age, and put to the sword almost 20,000 people. After this great slaughter the whole city was despoiled and burnt...[5]

Tell me again about how this guy wasn't even born when Beziers was sacked......tell us more...lol

 

[Syriusly]

Oh no you don't.

lol at the tired old 'Crusades' mythology. Ignore a few hundred years of Islmao-vermin rampaging around, then snivel about the defensive wars that followed,. Trulu stupid..

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot but I see right through your false equivalence apologetic defenses for Islam, you are no better than a advocate for National Socialism.

I'm an agnostic myself. These tards are just mentally ill and hate Xians because they oppose harmful sexual fetishes favored by sickos, is all.

You are the one agreeing with the asshole who is promoting killing Muslims in America.

I am the one supporting the Constitution- and Freedom of Religion.

I am okay with that.

 

[Syriusly]

More Christians killing Christians

Thus began a period of confusion and violence in France, known as the Wars of Religion, that lasted until almost the end of the century. A famous incident of this period was the Massacre of St. Bartholomew’s Day. On the night of Aug. 24/25, 1572, after a council at which the queen mother Catherine de Médicis, King Charles IX, the Duke d’Anjou (later Henry III), and the Guises were present, there occurred a massacre in which Coligny and almost all the leading Huguenots in Paris were slain. The Paris massacre was repeated throughout France, and Protestants were slain in thousands. The Protestant survivors resolved upon a desperate resistance, and a Huguenot political party was formed at Milhaud, near Nîmes, in 1573. Especially prominent was Philippe de Mornay, known as Duplessis-Mornay. The Huguenots at first hoped that the crown of France would pass to a Huguenot; when that became obviously impossible, they fought for full religious and civil liberty within the state.

You can't make such discernments because you have no education or the critical thinking skills to use one if you had one.

Big talk from a little man.

 

[bodecea]

Oh no you don't.

lol at the tired old 'Crusades' mythology. Ignore a few hundred years of Islmao-vermin rampaging around, then snivel about the defensive wars that followed,. Trulu stupid..

And by 'tired' you mean you hate having it brought up.

You don't even know what the Northern Crusades were- and probably don't give a damn that your fine Crusaders sacked the finest- and largest Christian city of the era- Constantinople.

You want to ignore the wars of the Reformation- where fine Christians killed each other for being the wrong kind of Christians- armies rampaged across Europe- Catholics killing Protestants- Protestants killing Catholics- and pretty much all of them killing some Jews along the way.

The French drove out the and murdered the Huegonots, and massacred the Knights Templer.
The English drove out the Jews- and so did the Spanish.

Does that mean all modern Christians are bad- or even that all Christians of that era were bad?

Of course not- it means assholes used religion to kill people.

And that is what is happening with Islamic extremists today.

The vast majority of victims of Islamic terrorism- are Muslims.

Just like during the Reformation- the vast majority of victims of Christian extremist terrorism were Christians.

All of that combined .

I do love the arguments of the Christians who argue

"Look we are better than Muslims because the millions we murdered are fewer than the millions the Muslims murdered"

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

I'm an atheist you stupid faggot .

Like I said- assholes use religion to kill people- and assholes like you use religion to advocate violence against other people- because of religion.

Just like you keep doing in this thread.

Just because you are an atheist doesn't make you less of a religious bigot.

Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.