Sarah Palin Faces Conservative Backlash

You're always free to provide your own polls BUT the bottom line is that Palin's biggest enemy is herself!

Palin's biggest enemy are sexist liberal men who can't tolerate women who don't cater to their belief in their intellectual superiority and liberal women who are liberal men's bitches who cater to liberal men's belief in their intellectual superiority. Liberal women unfortunately don't believe women should be Palin's biggest enemy are sexist liberal men who can't tolerate women who don't cater to their belief in their intellectual superiority.
Sarah Palin’s milk joke goes sour
March 15, 5:49 PM

..... why did she crack a joke about Michelle Obama's campaign to make it easier for women to breastfeed? When the conversation turned to the escalating price of gas and groceries, Palin reportedly said, "It's no wonder Michelle Obama is telling everybody you better breastfeed your baby--yeah, you better--because the price of milk is so high right now!"

..... Who knows whether or not Palin will run for the nation's highest office. But if she does, comments like this one do little to make her sound presidential. For one, even if it was a joke, Palin was making light of something that has to do with the future of this country--the health and well-being of its children. And even if Palin spent most of the talk discussing deficits, health-care reform and foreign affairs, it's unnecessary side comments like these that will--whether she likes it or not--lead the news.

Here's the difference.

I'm not really a Palin fan, I just think the hate driven assault on her by the left is pathetic. My lack of thinking a lot of her is for things like quitting as Governor, which I think was a huge mistake. Seeking Federal money and the bridge to nowhere. I didn't like her press conference when she quit as governor where she sounded like a starlet discussing her next role and nothing like Ronald Reagan with a true belief. She seemed to see the tea party parade and run in front of it as opposed to having anything to do with it's formation. And worst of all, she supported McCain's Senate re-election.

You on the other hand drag out a couple dumb quotes, which is complete and utter hypocrisy to your not giving a rats ass about the ENDLESS completely moronic musings of imbeciles like Al Gore, John Kerry and Joe Biden. I have a standard I follow. You don't. There is a word for that...
 
Sarah Palin angers Fox News CEO Roger Ailes; Could it cost Palin her job?
March 14, 2011

..... Reportedly, Fox News CEO Roger Ailes is less than thrilled with Palin on account of her infamous January "Blood Libel" video. Following the Arizona shooting which left six dead and 13 injured, including Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, Palin reportedly asked Ailes for advice.

Palin created the video out of frustration when several media outlets blamed her for the tragic shooting -- Ailes however, told her that it would be best to steer clear of the situation. He advised her to "lie low," adding that "There's no need to interject yourself into the story." Unsurprisingly, Palin went ahead and spoke up anyway.

According to New York Magazine, Ailes is not happy with her decision.

The mag quotes "a person familiar with Ailes's thinking" as saying, "Before she responded, she was making herself look like a victim. She was winning. She went out and did the blood libel thing, and Roger is thinking, 'Why did you call me for advice?'"

Two months after the incident, we're not inclined to think this is a particularly ground-breaking or surprising development. However, several outlets are now weighing in on Ailes' anger, and rumors are circulating that Palin may lose her $1 million annual salary with the network .....

http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2011/...-roger-ailes-could-it-cost-palin-her-job.html
When you have a reputation of being a "loose canon" who must be shielded from the media, as was the case during the 2008 McCain Presidential Campaign, one would expect that over the next 4 years Palin would make a concerted effort to guard against making these kinds of comments in public.

FOXNEWS is paying Palin $1 million a year and giving her the kind of public exposure that other presidential candidates would "die for."

After contacting Fox News CEO Roger Ailes concerning an appropriate response to the Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords shooting, perhaps an "intellectually superior" candidate would have followed his expert advice and not lash out in the media with her "blood libel" comments.
 
Last edited:
The media has a vendetta against Palin because she won't kiss their ass and hits THEM BACK with the bullshit they spew.

The left doesn't like her why? they JUST HATE. and that's good enough reason for them.
 
I'm sort of glad the wingnuts think we liberals destroyed Sarah Palin.

That's the sort of myth I can enjoy.
Yes, and that's what's morally wrong with you. Who's some bitch to defy you? Congratulations. And your liberal bitches doing you bidding are happy to lead the charge because they don't think a mere woman has the right to defy the liberal collective either.
 
Last edited:
I'm sort of glad the wingnuts think we liberals destroyed Sarah Palin.

That's the sort of myth I can enjoy.
Yes, and that's what's morally wrong with you. Who's some bitch to defy you? Congratulations. And your liberal bitches doing you bidding are happy to lead the charge because they don't think a mere woman has the right to defy the liberal collective either.

but remember, THEY care for women and their RIGHTS more than ANYONE else.
 
You notice IT'S only the Liberal so called MEN, who is the ones starting most of the threads on ANY conservative woman?

A strong conservative woman must really threaten what little manhood they have.:lol:

Bitch please, Bachmann and Palin aren't feared by liberals, shit, we wish they success in their nominations, only a dumbass rightwinger life yourself would believe otherwise, thats why even people in her party are distancing themselves from the both of them, but please, by all means keep believing otherwise, that liberals fear those two bitches.
 
The media has a vendetta against Palin because she won't kiss their ass and hits THEM BACK with the bullshit they spew.

The left doesn't like her why? they JUST HATE. and that's good enough reason for them.

You mean the media like Foxnews and Roger Ailes, the ones that pay her a million dollars a year? You're fucking off your rocker.
 
Constitutionalist and Conservative talk show host Mark Levin ripped the Republicans yesterday for them dissing Palin. Here is his response. It's a good one and makes sense.


Mark Levin on Monday, March 14, 2011 at 7:53am

The corporate hate for Sarah Palin at Politico is obvious. The latest is here Palin 'becoming Al Sharpton'? - Jonathan Martin and John F. Harris - POLITICO.com

But if you google Politico and Palin, the evidence of a Politico agenda is overwhelming. And the manner in which Politico's editors pursue their hate-Palin agenda is to cherry-pick the individuals they quote to make the point they want made.

A couple of quick things:

1. As I demonstrated last week, remarkably George Will missed the Reagan Revolution not only in 1976 but as late as 1980. In the 1979 Republican Presidential Primary, his first choice was Howard Baker, his second choice was George H. W. Bush, and his third choice was Reagan. Not until days before the 1980 general election did he write on November 3, 1980 that Reagan deserved election. For all his wonderful columns, the Republican electorate better understood the needs of the nation and the excellence of a potential Reagan presidency than Will. It is hard to believe he was so wrong about a matter of such great import, despite Reagan's presence on the national scene for many years.

2. Charles Krauthammer was not only wrong about Reagan, as late as 1980 he was a speech-writer for Vice President Walter Mondale. Krauthammer, like Will, not only missed the significance of the Reagan candidacy, but was putting words in the mouth of a terribly flawed politician from a philosophical perspective. I certainly do not begrudge, but in fact encourage, liberals becoming conservatives or Democrats becoming Republicans. Reagan was a Democrat who famously changed parties. But I do not believe that individuals touted by a left-wing “news” site as two of the leading conservative intellectuals, who stunningly opposed Reagan's candidacy while both were of mature age and mind, are necessarily reliable barometers in this regard. The “non-intellectual” voters knew better.

3. It is apparent that several of President George W. Bush's former senior staffers are hostile to Sarah Palin, including Karl Rove, David Frum, and Pete Wehner, to name only three. Pete is a good friend and a very smart guy. That said, Bush's record, at best, is marginally conservative, and depending on the issue, worse. In fact, the Tea Party movement is, in part, a negative reaction to Bush's profligate spending (including his expansion of a bankrupt Medicare program to include prescription drugs). And while Bush's spending comes nowhere near Barack Obama’s, that is not the standard. Moreover, Bush was not exactly among our most articulate presidents, let alone conservative voices. I raise this not to compare Bush to Palin, but to point out only a few of the situational aspects of the criticism from the Bush community corner. (If necessary, and if challenged, I will take the time to lay out the case in all its particulars, as well as other non-conservative Bush policies and statements. No Republican president is perfect, of course, but certainly some are more perfect that others, if you will.)

This is not to say the folks cherry-picked by Politico are without accomplishment and merit. They clearly are accomplished. But that's not the point. Most were not involved in either the Reagan Revolution or the Tea Party movement, and were not, to the best of my knowledge, early outspoken supporters of either. What is necessary is a fulsome debate on each candidate's substance and policy positions. Most of these Politico stories are little more than excuses to attack Palin, intended to damage her early on in case she should decide to run. This has been going on for some time now.

If she is as weak as some think, why the obsession? Why the contempt? Moreover, Palin has used social media and other outlets to comment substantively on a wide range of issues and policies. In fact, she has spoken on a wider array of issues than Youtube governor Chris Christie, popular among most of these folks, and her positions have, for the most part, been solidly conservative. (Christie's positions on numerous issues important to conservatives are all but ignored by some of those complaining about Palin; indeed, the same could be said of potential presidential contenders Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, and Mitch Daniels, among others.) My purpose in mentioning Christie here is to juxtapose the demands by “the intellectuals” on one politician versus another. Their inquisitiveness seems influenced by their political bias. That's not unusual, but it requires underscoring lest their opinions be viewed or promoted as objective.

As a Reaganite pre-dating Reagan's 1976 candidacy, the contempt for Palin does, in fact, remind me of the contempt some had for Reagan, especially from the media and Republican establishment, although no comparison is exact. I've not settled on a favorite would-be presidential candidate, but I also know media hit-jobs when I see them. I am hopeful more conservatives will begin to speak out about this or, before we know it, we will wonder why we are holding our noses and voting for another Republican endorsed by “the intellectuals” but opposed by a majority of the people.
 
Last edited:
Oh goodie, ANOTHER poll. and this one from the Compost- ABC.:lol:
You're always free to provide your own polls BUT the bottom line is that Palin's biggest enemy is herself!

Palin's biggest enemy are sexist liberal men who can't tolerate women who don't cater to their belief in their intellectual superiority and liberal women who are liberal men's bitches who cater to liberal men's belief in their intellectual superiority. Liberal women unfortunately don't believe women should be free to think for themselves.

Sexist liberal men like Karl Rove, Roger Ailes and Foxnews?
 
Get some perspective left wing hate mongers, at least for the sake of your mental health. A "backlash" is what democrats faced last November when they lost in the worst landslide in half a century. Unlike the socialist peoples democrat party, the GOP is an evolving dynamic organization that embraces a variety of political opinions including Palin.
 
You notice IT'S only the Liberal so called MEN, who is the ones starting most of the threads on ANY conservative woman?

A strong conservative woman must really threaten what little manhood they have.:lol:

Well, I'm not a liberal, but I have a crush on this woman.

Thatcher.jpg


My hero.

Sigh.

She knew her shit, didn't she?
 
You notice IT'S only the Liberal so called MEN, who is the ones starting most of the threads on ANY conservative woman?

A strong conservative woman must really threaten what little manhood they have.:lol:

Bitch please, Bachmann and Palin aren't feared by liberals, shit, we wish they success in their nominations, only a dumbass rightwinger life yourself would believe otherwise, thats why even people in her party are distancing themselves from the both of them, but please, by all means keep believing otherwise, that liberals fear those two bitches.


:blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::blahblah::boobies:

yawn
 
I'm sort of glad the wingnuts think we liberals destroyed Sarah Palin.

That's the sort of myth I can enjoy.
Yes, and that's what's morally wrong with you. Who's some bitch to defy you? Congratulations. And your liberal bitches doing you bidding are happy to lead the charge because they don't think a mere woman has the right to defy the liberal collective either.

Why are you trying to hide Palin behind the gender card?

That's the victimology I was talking about,

6 months ago. :lol:
 
Oh goodie, ANOTHER poll. and this one from the Compost- ABC.:lol:
You're always free to provide your own polls BUT the bottom line is that Palin's biggest enemy is herself!

Palin's biggest enemy are sexist liberal men who can't tolerate women who don't cater to their belief in their intellectual superiority and liberal women who are liberal men's bitches who cater to liberal men's belief in their intellectual superiority. Liberal women unfortunately don't believe women should be free to think for themselves.

So what, we're supposed to pretend that Palin is smart?

lolol
 
You notice IT'S only the Liberal so called MEN, who is the ones starting most of the threads on ANY conservative woman?

A strong conservative woman must really threaten what little manhood they have.:lol:

Well, I'm not a liberal, but I have a crush on this woman.

Thatcher.jpg


My hero.

Sigh.

She knew her shit, didn't she?

Yep, Thatcher knew her shit......the shit she knew were fucking Socialists/Marxists like you......and she had a few choice words for you Obamarrhoidal LibTURDS.
 
Get some perspective left wing hate mongers, at least for the sake of your mental health. A "backlash" is what democrats faced last November when they lost in the worst landslide in half a century. Unlike the socialist peoples democrat party, the GOP is an evolving dynamic organization that embraces a variety of political opinions including Palin.
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight......​


520.gif


490.gif
490.gif
490.gif
 
Well, I'm not a liberal, but I have a crush on this woman.

Thatcher.jpg


My hero.

Sigh.

She knew her shit, didn't she?

Yep, Thatcher knew her shit......the shit she knew were fucking Socialists/Marxists like you......and she had a few choice words for you Obamarrhoidal LibTURDS.

Poor, poor gautama. So socially stunted that he cannot even deal with people who agree with him. :lol::lol::lol:
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top