Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So all non-homosexual sex in prison is rape?
And boy, does she know about power tools !!!
Stepped right into that pile of shit, asswipe. And we do know you enjoy the latter.
The Bible advocates a man taking many wives, too.A same sex union is not just as normal as a marriage between a man and a woman.Same sex implies homosexuality, which is not normal, homosexuality is abnormal.
Homosexuals should not be given the same rights as a man and woman child bearing family. The government must move to ban and or criminalize homosexuality.
Did not the Christian right say the same about a black man and a white woman was not natural? Being in the south, I understand the problems about the illegal backing of marriage between a black man and a white woman. When you see a light skin black person, you can say his or her grandparents; or, great grandparents, were not married because his or her grandparents or great grandparents were white and black. Since they could not get married, his parents and he or she have a background that marriage is less important: because marriage was illegal to his family history.
The right says a black man does not have the same level of being in a married state. Still, was not that background to accept marriage was given to him because of the right in the past refused his family history to be married?
Look, there is going to be same sex couples, married or unmarried. They are going to have with some, children from a past marriage. Or in the case with the right, a lesbian woman was rapped and if the right gets what they want to have a child because abortion was made illegal.
If we say that black men or black women have a less importance with marriage, as they can say they can prove a marriage was illegal for them. What will the children of a same sex marriage will say in decades to come. With the right pointing out that marriage was illegal, you only make the next generation have a lower value that marriage is important.
The more the right says some can be married and some can be married, the right just makes marriage less important to the children that comes from these unions.
The Bible tells us a marriage is between and Man and a Woman, and they'll become ONE. As far as i know, i never read in the bible anything about a black man/white woman, or visa versa, not being able to marry. It's still a Man and Woman. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. There's no question about it, although many want to overlook that part and re-word what's said to their liking. No matter what anyone thinks, it doesn't change the fact that it's considered a sin.
The Bible advocates a man taking many wives, too.The Bible tells us a marriage is between and Man and a Woman, and they'll become ONE. As far as i know, i never read in the bible anything about a black man/white woman, or visa versa, not being able to marry. It's still a Man and Woman. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. There's no question about it, although many want to overlook that part and re-word what's said to their liking. No matter what anyone thinks, it doesn't change the fact that it's considered a sin.
The Bible advocates a man taking many wives, too.The Bible tells us a marriage is between and Man and a Woman, and they'll become ONE. As far as i know, i never read in the bible anything about a black man/white woman, or visa versa, not being able to marry. It's still a Man and Woman. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. There's no question about it, although many want to overlook that part and re-word what's said to their liking. No matter what anyone thinks, it doesn't change the fact that it's considered a sin.
And slaves.
And concubines.
Only in the OT.
And "slave" in biblical times did not have the same connotations as "slave" holds today.
Don't forget condemnations on praying in public...and that's not even Old Testament stuff.
Funny that only a couple of the ten commandments are actual laws...
Actually 4 of the 10 ARE laws:
#6 - Thou shalt not kill
#7 - Thou shalt not commit adultry
#8 - Thou shalt not steal
#9 - Thou shalt not bear false witness (lie) (ya, i know everyone lies, but it's against the law to lie in court)
Which is what I said...only a couple of them are laws...and adultery ain't one of 'em.
Actually 4 of the 10 ARE laws:
#6 - Thou shalt not kill
#7 - Thou shalt not commit adultry
#8 - Thou shalt not steal
#9 - Thou shalt not bear false witness (lie) (ya, i know everyone lies, but it's against the law to lie in court)
Which is what I said...only a couple of them are laws...and adultery ain't one of 'em.
Adultry is used against people in a divorce....so if it weren't against the law, how could someone get a divorce for that reason?
The Bible advocates a man taking many wives, too.Did not the Christian right say the same about a black man and a white woman was not natural? Being in the south, I understand the problems about the illegal backing of marriage between a black man and a white woman. When you see a light skin black person, you can say his or her grandparents; or, great grandparents, were not married because his or her grandparents or great grandparents were white and black. Since they could not get married, his parents and he or she have a background that marriage is less important: because marriage was illegal to his family history.
The right says a black man does not have the same level of being in a married state. Still, was not that background to accept marriage was given to him because of the right in the past refused his family history to be married?
Look, there is going to be same sex couples, married or unmarried. They are going to have with some, children from a past marriage. Or in the case with the right, a lesbian woman was rapped and if the right gets what they want to have a child because abortion was made illegal.
If we say that black men or black women have a less importance with marriage, as they can say they can prove a marriage was illegal for them. What will the children of a same sex marriage will say in decades to come. With the right pointing out that marriage was illegal, you only make the next generation have a lower value that marriage is important.
The more the right says some can be married and some can be married, the right just makes marriage less important to the children that comes from these unions.
The Bible tells us a marriage is between and Man and a Woman, and they'll become ONE. As far as i know, i never read in the bible anything about a black man/white woman, or visa versa, not being able to marry. It's still a Man and Woman. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. There's no question about it, although many want to overlook that part and re-word what's said to their liking. No matter what anyone thinks, it doesn't change the fact that it's considered a sin.
Why can't gays start their own church and get married there?
Actually 4 of the 10 ARE laws:
#6 - Thou shalt not kill
#7 - Thou shalt not commit adultry
#8 - Thou shalt not steal
#9 - Thou shalt not bear false witness (lie) (ya, i know everyone lies, but it's against the law to lie in court)
Which is what I said...only a couple of them are laws...and adultery ain't one of 'em.
Adultry is used against people in a divorce....so if it weren't against the law, how could someone get a divorce for that reason?
Your reference is not from the Bible .. it's a biased opinion.The Bible advocates a man taking many wives, too.The Bible tells us a marriage is between and Man and a Woman, and they'll become ONE. As far as i know, i never read in the bible anything about a black man/white woman, or visa versa, not being able to marry. It's still a Man and Woman. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. There's no question about it, although many want to overlook that part and re-word what's said to their liking. No matter what anyone thinks, it doesn't change the fact that it's considered a sin.
The old testament did....Christians follow the New Testament. The OT is basically for historical purpose. After Jesus came, the old laws were no longer valid, He gave us everything we ever needed. The NT does not advocate more than one wife....so your statement is not valid. Read this.............
Why did godly men in the OT have more than one wife? | Bible.org - Worlds Largest Bible Study Site
Your reference is not from the Bible .. it's a biased opinion.The Bible advocates a man taking many wives, too.
The old testament did....Christians follow the New Testament. The OT is basically for historical purpose. After Jesus came, the old laws were no longer valid, He gave us everything we ever needed. The NT does not advocate more than one wife....so your statement is not valid. Read this.............
Why did godly men in the OT have more than one wife? | Bible.org - Worlds Largest Bible Study Site
Only in the OT.
And "slave" in biblical times did not have the same connotations as "slave" holds today.
The Old Testament and God did not advocate many wives. Having many wives was a man thing.The Bible advocates a man taking many wives, too.The Bible tells us a marriage is between and Man and a Woman, and they'll become ONE. As far as i know, i never read in the bible anything about a black man/white woman, or visa versa, not being able to marry. It's still a Man and Woman. Homosexuality is condemned in the Bible. There's no question about it, although many want to overlook that part and re-word what's said to their liking. No matter what anyone thinks, it doesn't change the fact that it's considered a sin.
The old testament did....Christians follow the New Testament. The OT is basically for historical purpose. After Jesus came, the old laws were no longer valid, He gave us everything we ever needed. The NT does not advocate more than one wife....so your statement is not valid. Read this.............
Why did godly men in the OT have more than one wife? | Bible.org - Worlds Largest Bible Study Site
