Reviews in: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP

[bripat9643]

Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.

If you can't then your definition is invalidated.

Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.

Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.

So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?

BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).

The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.

Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.

White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".

Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.

The term "white nationalist" is just a euphemism meaning "Nazi." It's an attack on every patriotic American.

You're a douche bag, pure and simple.

 

[bripat9643]

Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.

So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?

BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).

The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.

Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.

White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".

Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.

The DNC literally did that and you idiots are cheering them on for it.

Isn't it amazing how they are far more guilty of everything they accuse Trump of?

 

[Wry Catcher]

So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?

BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).

The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.

Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.

White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".

Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.

The DNC literally did that and you idiots are cheering them on for it.

Isn't it amazing how they are far more guilty of everything they accuse Trump of?

Gee, two morons make a claim, with no evidence. I made a claim, with the evidence posted on national TV over the past two weeks.

 

[ptbw forever]

The indigenous rights groups in Europe are actually ultra left wing, just like the Native American advocacy groups.

Your "far right", "fascist" and "ultra right" bullshit is nothing but a collection of racial slurs that trick dumb white people into advocating against their own interests.

Funny, even they think they are rightists and the people who advocate liberal immigration policies are, you guessed it, leftists. Quit talking about shit you know nothing about. The political definitions used by the American right are not the same ones used for 200 years by political scientists and philosophers and make you sound gullible and uneducated.

Indigenous rights are very much a left wing issue, just ask Amnesty International.

People who advocate "liberal immigration policies" in Europe knowing it will destroy the native population and its culture are fascists, just like La Raza is fascist for wanting "liberal immigration" in US knowing it will allow them to expand Mexico over time.

Are you a native American? Yes or No?

And do not ever call anyone a fascist, in the context you offered, you've proved you are an imbecile.

Are you a native European?

No asshole, I am a native of San Francisco, fourth generation, and descendant of of those from France, Germany, Italy and Romania; White, Catholic, a navy vet and retired law enforcement. Are you a native imbecile?

I merely asked a question as ridiculous as the one you used to attempt to change the subject.

You idiots are just like Pavlov's dogs. You have no fucking clue what "fascism" is and merely launch the word at any white person who attempts to expand their social barometers to the level that you afford non-whites without even thinking about it.

You wouldn't dare call any non-white person a "fascist".

 

[Theowl32]

So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?

BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).

The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.

Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.

White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".

Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.

The DNC literally did that and you idiots are cheering them on for it.

Isn't it amazing how they are far more guilty of everything they accuse Trump of?

They are more guilty of EVERYTHING that they accuse ANYONE of.

They have no idea and certainly could not give one shit about the no bid contracts clinton gave Halliburton in the 90s. I stopped counting at 4.

They certainly do not give one shit about clinton signing the Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs. They certainly do not care that they put severe pressure on Fannie and Freddie for illegitimate loans.

They are such arrogant moronic sacks of unreal shit and these are the main types that make up their fucked up scumbag voting base.



Just watch those motherfuckers. It would be hilarious if there weren't so many of them.

 

[bripat9643]

The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.

Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.

White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".

Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.

The DNC literally did that and you idiots are cheering them on for it.

Isn't it amazing how they are far more guilty of everything they accuse Trump of?

Gee, two morons make a claim, with no evidence. I made a claim, with the evidence posted on national TV over the past two weeks.

A bunch of lying windbags blathering proves nothing.

 

[Theowl32]

Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.

White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".

Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.

The DNC literally did that and you idiots are cheering them on for it.

Isn't it amazing how they are far more guilty of everything they accuse Trump of?

Gee, two morons make a claim, with no evidence. I made a claim, with the evidence posted on national TV over the past two weeks.

A bunch of lying windbags blathering proves nothing.

Another example of these scumbags.



The first one is hilarious.

 

[BlackAsCoal]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

 

[Theowl32]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

How does it feel to know that you are still a slave of the democrats?

Not shocked that you do not realize that you are.

So I guess me AKSING you that, more than likely as no effect.

 

[RodISHI]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

Lying Hillary is not dangerous? So did you go along with letting Al Qaeda loose too!

 

[BlackAsCoal]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

Lying Hillary is not dangerous? So did you go along with letting Al Qaeda loose too!

You mean AL-CIA-DA? :0)

Yeah, they're dangerous.

 

[Katzndogz]

There is no way Trump can get the nomination. No way. Jeb has the machine and the money. Kasich is the only one that can beat hilly. Rubio is Hispanic. No way can Trump get nominated.

 

[Theowl32]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

How does it feel to know that you are still a slave of the democrats?

Not shocked that you do not realize that you are.

So I guess me AKSING you that, more than likely as no effect.

How does it feel to know that you're an ignorant bitch of a man that I cyber piss on for fun?

AKS yourself that dumb motherfucker.

Lol...

Man you are good. I swear we could hang out.

Not kidding. Good stuff

 

[flacaltenn]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

Lying Hillary is not dangerous? So did you go along with letting Al Qaeda loose too!

Or a danger to National Security? All these comparisons make it obvious we have a National Leadership crisis. Pure and simple observation from someone who lives outside the DNC/RNC cattle farms..

 

[RodISHI]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

Lying Hillary is not dangerous? So did you go along with letting Al Qaeda loose too!

You mean AL-CIA-DA? :0)

Yeah, they're dangerous.

Dipshits do get so busy watching the rattle of the viper that they forget that there is a head attached to the other end.

 

[Freewill]

The Reviews Are In: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP

Conservative writer Ron Fournier:

Well done, @realDonaldTrump. You made Democrats a party of sunny patriotism and values.

You sure @billclinton didn't ask you to run?

— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) July 29, 2016

National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:

Why this convention is better: It's about loving America. GOP convention was about loving Trump. If you didn't love Trump, it offered nada.

— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 29, 2016

John Podhoretz, former Ronald Reagan speech writer and Commentary editor:

Take about five paragraphs out of that Obama speech and it could have been a Reagan speech. Trust me. I know.

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 28, 2016

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:

if repubs had championed their principles with specifics rather than embrace autocracy - they wouldn't have yielded this turf to dems.

— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) July 29, 2016

Conservative blogger Erick Erickson:

For Republicans who are not social conservatives, I have to imagine last night and tonight at the DNC are having an impact on them.

— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 29, 2016

Conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace:

So most of conservative media and the GOP spent the week rooting for Russia, and now the Democrats get to rally around the flag.

Dreadful.

— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) July 29, 2016

Conservative Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes:

Snark aside: GOP needs to understand what is happening to them tonight…

— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016

Do you know how old I am? Old enough to remember when speeches like this would've been given at GOP convention… Not Dem one. Brutal.

— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016

more at link :0)

The party of stupid at it again.....

Which is exactly what these conservative writers are saying.

thanks Bozo. :0)

They are the reason why the GOP is considered as such.

The DNC was a national embarrassment that caused almost half the delegates to leave. The RNC just wasn't as good as some had hoped.

What more do people want from a convention? At the GOP there was no fence around the stage. There were no real protests. Trump's children were shining stars. Nothing like that happened at all with the democrat convention. Hell they even had to send out for US flags when it was noted they forgot. Pitiful.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”
Scholars From Top Conservative And Libertarian Legal Blogs Warn Of Trump Presidency

Law professors and experts writing in two leading conservative and libertarian legal blogs are increasingly warning about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency, arguing that his foreign policy positions and statements on Russia endanger national security and that his domestic policies could make U.S. citizens the victims of fascism.
Conservative Legal Experts: Trump Is “A Menace,” A “Lunatic,” “A Fascist Thug,” A “‘Useful Idiot’ For Putin,” And A Danger To “Our National Security”

More anti-Trump from CONSERVATIVES.

There is no way in Hell that Trump will get anywhere near the White House.

Lying Hillary is not dangerous? So did you go along with letting Al Qaeda loose too!

You mean AL-CIA-DA? :0)

Yeah, they're dangerous.

Dipshits do get so busy watching the rattle of the viper that they forget that there is a head attached to the other end.

This is what we carried in the fields around home from an early age.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The mythical Obamabots have nothing on the Trump cult of personality. It's a shame we are finally far enough away from WWII that this kind of fascistic politics can finally gain a toehold in America. Americans used to be horrified by such dark-side politics.

You don't have clue what "fascism" is.

More than you do apparently, this white nationalist "law and order" manic you guys are worshiping is not even trying to hide it.

More fear-mongering....

Trump is an American nationalist, something this country literally requires to be able to survive much longer.

White nationalism is what will happen in Europe as native Europeans understand the indigenous cultures that the EU and their Islamist allies are trying to destroy.

White Nationalism worked so well for Herr Hitler.

communism worked great for the Soviet Union and Cuba...and mine is actually true....

 

[amethyst]

how so, i voted for bernie and now im a republican. go trump

 

[Theowl32]

The Reviews Are In: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP

Conservative writer Ron Fournier:

Well done, @realDonaldTrump. You made Democrats a party of sunny patriotism and values.

You sure @billclinton didn't ask you to run?

— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) July 29, 2016

National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:

Why this convention is better: It's about loving America. GOP convention was about loving Trump. If you didn't love Trump, it offered nada.

— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 29, 2016

John Podhoretz, former Ronald Reagan speech writer and Commentary editor:

Take about five paragraphs out of that Obama speech and it could have been a Reagan speech. Trust me. I know.

— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 28, 2016

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:

if repubs had championed their principles with specifics rather than embrace autocracy - they wouldn't have yielded this turf to dems.

— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) July 29, 2016

Conservative blogger Erick Erickson:

For Republicans who are not social conservatives, I have to imagine last night and tonight at the DNC are having an impact on them.

— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 29, 2016

Conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace:

So most of conservative media and the GOP spent the week rooting for Russia, and now the Democrats get to rally around the flag.

Dreadful.

— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) July 29, 2016

Conservative Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes:

Snark aside: GOP needs to understand what is happening to them tonight…

— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016

Do you know how old I am? Old enough to remember when speeches like this would've been given at GOP convention… Not Dem one. Brutal.

— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016

more at link :0)

The party of stupid at it again.....

Which is exactly what these conservative writers are saying.

thanks Bozo. :0)

They are the reason why the GOP is considered as such.

The DNC was a national embarrassment that caused almost half the delegates to leave. The RNC just wasn't as good as some had hoped.

What more do people want from a convention? At the GOP there was no fence around the stage. There were no real protests. Trump's children were shining stars. Nothing like that happened at all with the democrat convention. Hell they even had to send out for US flags when it was noted they forgot. Pitiful.

Plus, you can't even conceive how much Febreze would be needed to clean up that DNC center. You know, considering there were Palestinians there along with a lot of BLM people and Black Panther people.