Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, I could not find any examples of the blacks making it on their own either.The NAZIS were socialists like the People's Republic of China is a Republic...Why do you leave out the socialism part out? It was working so good too. He would not have allowed Israel to become a nation.White Nationalism worked so well for Herr Hitler.More fear-mongering....More than you do apparently, this white nationalist "law and order" manic you guys are worshiping is not even trying to hide it.You don't have clue what "fascism" is.
Trump is an American nationalist, something this country literally requires to be able to survive much longer.
White nationalism is what will happen in Europe as native Europeans understand the indigenous cultures that the EU and their Islamist allies are trying to destroy.
Yaaaay democrats!! Yaaaay socialism! Yaaaay National Socialist Worker's Party!!
Booo Israel!
Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.Your personal opinion as to what constitutes right and left do not agree with accepted terms and philosophies that have meant very specific things for a very long time. How can we even have a discussion when you have your own personal definitions to political concepts older than both of us? Why am I again going down this road again with yet another political dummy? Say something about Trump and the topic at hand or quit wasting my time.Indigenous rights are very much a left wing issue, just ask Amnesty International.Funny, even they think they are rightists and the people who advocate liberal immigration policies are, you guessed it, leftists. Quit talking about shit you know nothing about. The political definitions used by the American right are not the same ones used for 200 years by political scientists and philosophers and make you sound gullible and uneducated.The indigenous rights groups in Europe are actually ultra left wing, just like the Native American advocacy groups.Seems your man is scapegoating Muslims as well, I fail to see the distinction you are trying to make. The ultra right of Europe are not embarrassed to call themselves what they are, usually Christian nationalists, quit trying to split hairs here.More fear-mongering....
Trump is an American nationalist, something this country literally requires to be able to survive much longer.
White nationalism is what will happen in Europe as native Europeans understand the indigenous cultures that the EU and their Islamist allies are trying to destroy.
Your "far right", "fascist" and "ultra right" bullshit is nothing but a collection of racial slurs that trick dumb white people into advocating against their own interests.
People who advocate "liberal immigration policies" in Europe knowing it will destroy the native population and its culture are fascists, just like La Raza is fascist for wanting "liberal immigration" in US knowing it will allow them to expand Mexico over time.
You apparently don't understand socialism then....The NAZIS were socialists like the People's Republic of China is a Republic...Why do you leave out the socialism part out? It was working so good too. He would not have allowed Israel to become a nation.White Nationalism worked so well for Herr Hitler.More fear-mongering....More than you do apparently, this white nationalist "law and order" manic you guys are worshiping is not even trying to hide it.You don't have clue what "fascism" is.
Trump is an American nationalist, something this country literally requires to be able to survive much longer.
White nationalism is what will happen in Europe as native Europeans understand the indigenous cultures that the EU and their Islamist allies are trying to destroy.
Yaaaay democrats!! Yaaaay socialism! Yaaaay National Socialist Worker's Party!!
Booo Israel!
Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.Your personal opinion as to what constitutes right and left do not agree with accepted terms and philosophies that have meant very specific things for a very long time. How can we even have a discussion when you have your own personal definitions to political concepts older than both of us? Why am I again going down this road again with yet another political dummy? Say something about Trump and the topic at hand or quit wasting my time.Indigenous rights are very much a left wing issue, just ask Amnesty International.Funny, even they think they are rightists and the people who advocate liberal immigration policies are, you guessed it, leftists. Quit talking about shit you know nothing about. The political definitions used by the American right are not the same ones used for 200 years by political scientists and philosophers and make you sound gullible and uneducated.The indigenous rights groups in Europe are actually ultra left wing, just like the Native American advocacy groups.Seems your man is scapegoating Muslims as well, I fail to see the distinction you are trying to make. The ultra right of Europe are not embarrassed to call themselves what they are, usually Christian nationalists, quit trying to split hairs here.
Your "far right", "fascist" and "ultra right" bullshit is nothing but a collection of racial slurs that trick dumb white people into advocating against their own interests.
People who advocate "liberal immigration policies" in Europe knowing it will destroy the native population and its culture are fascists, just like La Raza is fascist for wanting "liberal immigration" in US knowing it will allow them to expand Mexico over time.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.Your personal opinion as to what constitutes right and left do not agree with accepted terms and philosophies that have meant very specific things for a very long time. How can we even have a discussion when you have your own personal definitions to political concepts older than both of us? Why am I again going down this road again with yet another political dummy? Say something about Trump and the topic at hand or quit wasting my time.Indigenous rights are very much a left wing issue, just ask Amnesty International.Funny, even they think they are rightists and the people who advocate liberal immigration policies are, you guessed it, leftists. Quit talking about shit you know nothing about. The political definitions used by the American right are not the same ones used for 200 years by political scientists and philosophers and make you sound gullible and uneducated.The indigenous rights groups in Europe are actually ultra left wing, just like the Native American advocacy groups.
Your "far right", "fascist" and "ultra right" bullshit is nothing but a collection of racial slurs that trick dumb white people into advocating against their own interests.
People who advocate "liberal immigration policies" in Europe knowing it will destroy the native population and its culture are fascists, just like La Raza is fascist for wanting "liberal immigration" in US knowing it will allow them to expand Mexico over time.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
The Reviews Are In: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP
Conservative writer Ron Fournier:
Well done, @realDonaldTrump. You made Democrats a party of sunny patriotism and values.
You sure @billclinton didn't ask you to run?
— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) July 29, 2016
National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:
Why this convention is better: It's about loving America. GOP convention was about loving Trump. If you didn't love Trump, it offered nada.
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 29, 2016
John Podhoretz, former Ronald Reagan speech writer and Commentary editor:
Take about five paragraphs out of that Obama speech and it could have been a Reagan speech. Trust me. I know.
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 28, 2016
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:
if repubs had championed their principles with specifics rather than embrace autocracy - they wouldn't have yielded this turf to dems.
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) July 29, 2016
Conservative blogger Erick Erickson:
For Republicans who are not social conservatives, I have to imagine last night and tonight at the DNC are having an impact on them.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 29, 2016
Conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace:
So most of conservative media and the GOP spent the week rooting for Russia, and now the Democrats get to rally around the flag.
Dreadful.
— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) July 29, 2016
Conservative Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes:
Snark aside: GOP needs to understand what is happening to them tonight…
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
Do you know how old I am? Old enough to remember when speeches like this would've been given at GOP convention… Not Dem one. Brutal.
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
more at link :0)
ROFL! So what "facts" and policy" was on display during the Democrat convention?Whoever voted for t3h Donald must feel really foolish rightnow
Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk
Trump voters aren't smart enough to realize how stupid they are.
I'm watching Trump's speech in Colorado. It's all "me me me me me". No policy, no facts, just anecdotes and blather. I did this and I did that. Wolfe Blitzer just cut away saying "We'll get to him when he gets to more substance". Like that is going to happen.
The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.Your personal opinion as to what constitutes right and left do not agree with accepted terms and philosophies that have meant very specific things for a very long time. How can we even have a discussion when you have your own personal definitions to political concepts older than both of us? Why am I again going down this road again with yet another political dummy? Say something about Trump and the topic at hand or quit wasting my time.Indigenous rights are very much a left wing issue, just ask Amnesty International.Funny, even they think they are rightists and the people who advocate liberal immigration policies are, you guessed it, leftists. Quit talking about shit you know nothing about. The political definitions used by the American right are not the same ones used for 200 years by political scientists and philosophers and make you sound gullible and uneducated.
People who advocate "liberal immigration policies" in Europe knowing it will destroy the native population and its culture are fascists, just like La Raza is fascist for wanting "liberal immigration" in US knowing it will allow them to expand Mexico over time.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).
The Reviews Are In: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP
Conservative writer Ron Fournier:
Well done, @realDonaldTrump. You made Democrats a party of sunny patriotism and values.
You sure @billclinton didn't ask you to run?
— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) July 29, 2016
National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:
Why this convention is better: It's about loving America. GOP convention was about loving Trump. If you didn't love Trump, it offered nada.
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 29, 2016
John Podhoretz, former Ronald Reagan speech writer and Commentary editor:
Take about five paragraphs out of that Obama speech and it could have been a Reagan speech. Trust me. I know.
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 28, 2016
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:
if repubs had championed their principles with specifics rather than embrace autocracy - they wouldn't have yielded this turf to dems.
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) July 29, 2016
Conservative blogger Erick Erickson:
For Republicans who are not social conservatives, I have to imagine last night and tonight at the DNC are having an impact on them.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 29, 2016
Conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace:
So most of conservative media and the GOP spent the week rooting for Russia, and now the Democrats get to rally around the flag.
Dreadful.
— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) July 29, 2016
Conservative Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes:
Snark aside: GOP needs to understand what is happening to them tonight…
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
Do you know how old I am? Old enough to remember when speeches like this would've been given at GOP convention… Not Dem one. Brutal.
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
more at link :0)
The Reviews Are In: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP
Conservative writer Ron Fournier:
Well done, @realDonaldTrump. You made Democrats a party of sunny patriotism and values.
You sure @billclinton didn't ask you to run?
— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) July 29, 2016
National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:
Why this convention is better: It's about loving America. GOP convention was about loving Trump. If you didn't love Trump, it offered nada.
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 29, 2016
John Podhoretz, former Ronald Reagan speech writer and Commentary editor:
Take about five paragraphs out of that Obama speech and it could have been a Reagan speech. Trust me. I know.
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 28, 2016
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:
if repubs had championed their principles with specifics rather than embrace autocracy - they wouldn't have yielded this turf to dems.
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) July 29, 2016
Conservative blogger Erick Erickson:
For Republicans who are not social conservatives, I have to imagine last night and tonight at the DNC are having an impact on them.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 29, 2016
Conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace:
So most of conservative media and the GOP spent the week rooting for Russia, and now the Democrats get to rally around the flag.
Dreadful.
— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) July 29, 2016
Conservative Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes:
Snark aside: GOP needs to understand what is happening to them tonight…
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
Do you know how old I am? Old enough to remember when speeches like this would've been given at GOP convention… Not Dem one. Brutal.
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
more at link :0)
I posted similar comments in another thread. I've watched conventions since the mid 1980's and the Democratic convention sounded like almost all the Republican conventions of the past. Faith, family, the greatness of the country and defense of our military.
The GOP nominee described a post-apocalyptic world where he alone can save humanity. And before anyone could wrap their head around that he called on Russia to hack sensitive US government email a few days later.
I've talked to many Republicans who know now they have to find or create a new party.
But yet the polls reveal a virtual tie....
You are black, so I understand that you understand very little. I also pretty much understand that you cannot help it.The Reviews Are In: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP
Conservative writer Ron Fournier:
Well done, @realDonaldTrump. You made Democrats a party of sunny patriotism and values.
You sure @billclinton didn't ask you to run?
— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) July 29, 2016
National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:
Why this convention is better: It's about loving America. GOP convention was about loving Trump. If you didn't love Trump, it offered nada.
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 29, 2016
John Podhoretz, former Ronald Reagan speech writer and Commentary editor:
Take about five paragraphs out of that Obama speech and it could have been a Reagan speech. Trust me. I know.
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 28, 2016
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:
if repubs had championed their principles with specifics rather than embrace autocracy - they wouldn't have yielded this turf to dems.
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) July 29, 2016
Conservative blogger Erick Erickson:
For Republicans who are not social conservatives, I have to imagine last night and tonight at the DNC are having an impact on them.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 29, 2016
Conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace:
So most of conservative media and the GOP spent the week rooting for Russia, and now the Democrats get to rally around the flag.
Dreadful.
— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) July 29, 2016
Conservative Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes:
Snark aside: GOP needs to understand what is happening to them tonight…
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
Do you know how old I am? Old enough to remember when speeches like this would've been given at GOP convention… Not Dem one. Brutal.
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
more at link :0)
I empathize.
Maybe if you did not have that obvious learning disability, you would know how well the democrats have been using YOU PEOPLE.
Let me axe you a question. Has there ever been a Republican slave owner? Not that you care.
Read my signature. Get a clue.
The Reviews Are In: Conservatives Say The DNC Was 'Disaster' For The GOP
Conservative writer Ron Fournier:
Well done, @realDonaldTrump. You made Democrats a party of sunny patriotism and values.
You sure @billclinton didn't ask you to run?
— Ron Fournier (@ron_fournier) July 29, 2016
National Review editor Jonah Goldberg:
Why this convention is better: It's about loving America. GOP convention was about loving Trump. If you didn't love Trump, it offered nada.
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 29, 2016
John Podhoretz, former Ronald Reagan speech writer and Commentary editor:
Take about five paragraphs out of that Obama speech and it could have been a Reagan speech. Trust me. I know.
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) July 28, 2016
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld:
if repubs had championed their principles with specifics rather than embrace autocracy - they wouldn't have yielded this turf to dems.
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) July 29, 2016
Conservative blogger Erick Erickson:
For Republicans who are not social conservatives, I have to imagine last night and tonight at the DNC are having an impact on them.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) July 29, 2016
Conservative Iowa radio host Steve Deace:
So most of conservative media and the GOP spent the week rooting for Russia, and now the Democrats get to rally around the flag.
Dreadful.
— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) July 29, 2016
Conservative Wisconsin radio host Charlie Sykes:
Snark aside: GOP needs to understand what is happening to them tonight…
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
Do you know how old I am? Old enough to remember when speeches like this would've been given at GOP convention… Not Dem one. Brutal.
— Charlie Sykes (@SykesCharlie) July 29, 2016
more at link :0)
I posted similar comments in another thread. I've watched conventions since the mid 1980's and the Democratic convention sounded like almost all the Republican conventions of the past. Faith, family, the greatness of the country and defense of our military.
The GOP nominee described a post-apocalyptic world where he alone can save humanity. And before anyone could wrap their head around that he called on Russia to hack sensitive US government email a few days later.
I've talked to many Republicans who know now they have to find or create a new party.
But yet the polls reveal a virtual tie....
A candle on the porch just before a hurricane burns bright.
Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.Your personal opinion as to what constitutes right and left do not agree with accepted terms and philosophies that have meant very specific things for a very long time. How can we even have a discussion when you have your own personal definitions to political concepts older than both of us? Why am I again going down this road again with yet another political dummy? Say something about Trump and the topic at hand or quit wasting my time.Indigenous rights are very much a left wing issue, just ask Amnesty International.
People who advocate "liberal immigration policies" in Europe knowing it will destroy the native population and its culture are fascists, just like La Raza is fascist for wanting "liberal immigration" in US knowing it will allow them to expand Mexico over time.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).
Are you a native European?Indigenous rights are very much a left wing issue, just ask Amnesty International.Funny, even they think they are rightists and the people who advocate liberal immigration policies are, you guessed it, leftists. Quit talking about shit you know nothing about. The political definitions used by the American right are not the same ones used for 200 years by political scientists and philosophers and make you sound gullible and uneducated.The indigenous rights groups in Europe are actually ultra left wing, just like the Native American advocacy groups.Seems your man is scapegoating Muslims as well, I fail to see the distinction you are trying to make. The ultra right of Europe are not embarrassed to call themselves what they are, usually Christian nationalists, quit trying to split hairs here.
Your "far right", "fascist" and "ultra right" bullshit is nothing but a collection of racial slurs that trick dumb white people into advocating against their own interests.
People who advocate "liberal immigration policies" in Europe knowing it will destroy the native population and its culture are fascists, just like La Raza is fascist for wanting "liberal immigration" in US knowing it will allow them to expand Mexico over time.
Are you a native American? Yes or No?
And do not ever call anyone a fascist, in the context you offered, you've proved you are an imbecile.
Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.Your personal opinion as to what constitutes right and left do not agree with accepted terms and philosophies that have meant very specific things for a very long time. How can we even have a discussion when you have your own personal definitions to political concepts older than both of us? Why am I again going down this road again with yet another political dummy? Say something about Trump and the topic at hand or quit wasting my time.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).
White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".
You are voting for fucking Hillary you unreal hypocrite.Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).
White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".
Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.
Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).
White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".
Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.
The DNC literally did that and you idiots are cheering them on for it.Except Trump is both a populist and a nationalist, they are not opposite positions.The Left-Right axis is OK when speaking in generalities. It would be better to use multiple Axes (nationalist-populist, socialist-libertarian, religious-nonreligious, authoritarian-liberal etc.) when describing the nature of various political movements, that's why I used "White nationalist" to describe Trump. My description included who is the main component of followers and their general political thrust.So you agree that the label "far right" is just fear-mongering? You do realize that you just conceded here, right?Welcome to the real world where ideological purity does not exist.Name non-white groups that are considered "far right" or "ultra right" by both the US and European medias.
If you can't then your definition is invalidated.
Even the European media occasionally admit that the "far right" parties are actually left wing on economics and most social issues.
BTW, "Far right" parties only embrace that terrible label because it differentiates them from other parties and gets them more publicity(mostly bad).
White nationalists support Trump because is pro-white and help their agenda by securing the border, not because they give a damn about "lbgtq".
Trump is a demagogue and a charlatan; White Nationalists support Trunk because he is a fascist and they are fascists. How do you identify a fascist in the 21st century in America? The wrap themselves in the American flag, carry the cross of Christianity, and piss on both.
