Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dude! You're not supposed to be taking home girls from bars!!
Damn sluts.
Hahaha! I'm not a Republican, so it's okay.
And don't knock sluts (until you've tried 'em lol). They're good people and they promote equality in that they ease the sexual income gap between Don Juan and Urkel. We must recognize that sexual currency is, in fact, currency, and grant all people equal access to society's supply of bedroom equity, lest we violate the social contract and leave millions disenfranchised.
i'm surprised that republican men get laid.
i'm surprised that republican men get laid.
they do... but it costs them.
Dude! You're not supposed to be taking home girls from bars!!
Damn sluts.
Hahaha! I'm not a Republican, so it's okay.
And don't knock sluts (until you've tried 'em lol). They're good people and they promote equality in that they ease the sexual income gap between Don Juan and Urkel. We must recognize that sexual currency is, in fact, currency, and grant all people equal access to society's supply of bedroom equity, lest we violate the social contract and leave millions disenfranchised.
Oh, I know! Because when you're poor, the only thing that's left is sex. Hopefully it's good. Unfortunately, it too often has unintended results.
I was one. I slept with everything that moved and a few things that didn't between 1976 and 1980. Last summer camp, the first sergeant actually thanked me for keeping my pants on.
True story.
I watched it. I didn't think so. She's too much of a shrill shill.
how the mighty have fallen.
I watched it. I didn't think so. She's too much of a shrill shill.
how the mighty have fallen.
She's Hannity of the Left. And I've watched more of her than Hannity. She, and Hannity, shouldn't be on MTP. Both are bombastic partisans.
I watched it. I didn't think so. She's too much of a shrill shill.
how the mighty have fallen.
She's Hannity of the Left. And I've watched more of her than Hannity. She, and Hannity, shouldn't be on MTP. Both are bombastic partisans.
I watched it. I didn't think so. She's too much of a shrill shill.
how the mighty have fallen.
She's Hannity of the Left. And I've watched more of her than Hannity. She, and Hannity, shouldn't be on MTP. Both are bombastic partisans.
how the mighty have fallen.
She's Hannity of the Left. And I've watched more of her than Hannity. She, and Hannity, shouldn't be on MTP. Both are bombastic partisans.
you could say a lot of things about her, but bombastic? i've never seen her raise her voice. even pat buchanan used to love going on her show.
so your level of tolerance must have ebbed. firstly, she's about a thousand times smarter than hannity; and her factchecking is pretty meticulous...unlike hannity
the comparison is a false one. if you want to say you disagree with her, that's fine. calling her shrill is simply a misrepresentation.
His behavior proves his perceptions, as do yours. Well played, sir. Well played.
You are entirely correct, his behavior proves his perception that all women, including whining bitches that are misstating facts, deserve respect. Just think of what that segment would have been like if he had acted the same way she did.
She's just like Debbie Wasserman-Schulz.....only more butch. Same exact talking points. Same loud personality. Same habit of trying to shout people down she doesn't agree with.
Well, we are closer to November....I watched it. I didn't think so. She's too much of a shrill shill.
how the mighty have fallen.
Calling her shrill is calling her female. She speaks her mind and she's female = shrill.
Dems had a chance to put women into power with Hillary. They picked hope and change instead.
how the mighty have fallen.
She's Hannity of the Left. And I've watched more of her than Hannity. She, and Hannity, shouldn't be on MTP. Both are bombastic partisans.
Hardly.. She may be partisan but she is very, very smart. Hannity couldn't find his rear with both hands.
Rachel also has a very good research team, you won't find her lying day in and day out just to put a program together.
Oh, you've made me see the light. What was I thinking.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/min...ar/08/mind-your-language-feminisation-madness
I watched it. I didn't think so. She's too much of a shrill shill.
how the mighty have fallen.
She's Hannity of the Left. And I've watched more of her than Hannity. She, and Hannity, shouldn't be on MTP. Both are bombastic partisans.
She's Hannity of the Left. And I've watched more of her than Hannity. She, and Hannity, shouldn't be on MTP. Both are bombastic partisans.
you could say a lot of things about her, but bombastic? i've never seen her raise her voice. even pat buchanan used to love going on her show.
so your level of tolerance must have ebbed. firstly, she's about a thousand times smarter than hannity; and her factchecking is pretty meticulous...unlike hannity
the comparison is a false one. if you want to say you disagree with her, that's fine. calling her shrill is simply a misrepresentation.
They both push a highly partisan, ideologically driven agenda. She talks over people - as she did on MTP - and twists facts to fit her narrative. That is no different than Hannity. This is what partisans do. They play to their bases. It doesn't matter if they are on the left or the right.
The "she's smarter than Hannity" is a silly argument. So what? Hannity is more successful. It's the same show, the same product sold to different target markets.
