LOLOLSouth Carolina said it was about slavery...And yet Lincoln offered the south slavery forever, as long as they stayed in the union. If it was all about slavery, why did the south refuse his offer and chose to fight?
Because it wasn't about slavery, it was about the protectionist tariffs, the Homestead Acts, and the railroad subsidies, along with all the other Federal projects that would benefit the Midwest and other northern states to the exclusion of the southern states. Jake knows that, he's just a big crybaby and likes to think he had something to do with it all if he babbles about 'slavery n stuff' a hundred and fifty years later or something. He has no real acheivements in life so he needs to make up some.
On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States. . . .
We, therefore, the People of South Carolina, by our delegates in Convention assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, have solemnly declared that the Union heretofore existing between this State and the other States of North America, is dissolved....
Declaration of Causes of Secession
In fact, the word, slave, appears in their declaration of secession 20 times. "Tariff?" Zero.
So why on Earth should anyone b'lieve an Internet goofball like you, who's trying to rewrite history, over them?
Why does a goofball like you think they know anything? They seceded over the introduction of the Morill Tariff Act being introduced to Congress, and saw it was going to pass. They also knew the Homestead Act and the Railroad Acts were going to pass; no reason to stay. Whether some modern era snowflakes like that or not is just too bad. In the 1862 elections Lincoln's faction only held on by the barest of margins, due entirely to his military control of the ballot boxes in the border states; his faction lost votes all over the Midwest and Atlantic states because many voters thought he was going to free the slaves and allow them to immigrate north and they would have to compete with cheap black labor. The South had already won all the Supreme Court battles over slavery, so it's just stupid to claim NC seceded over slavery; until Buchanan attempted to enforce his blockade at Sumter no other states seceded, after Sumter more states seveded, and after Lincoln deliberately copied Buchanan the rest seceded.
And again no one can claim secession was illegal, and can't show otherwise. Lincoln deliberately started a war, with an act of war.
I quoted South Carolina stating slavery was their big issue. Argue with them.
Don't need to; too much evidence to the contrary, and there is nothing you can do to change that, except suffer and try to pretend you had anything to do with freeing anybody. They were forming their own Constitution and making slavery part of their new nation; you probably aren't educated enough to see the difference between seceding to avoid being looted by northern manufacturers and bankers and moving on to make their own government platforms afterwards.
In fact it was only after news got back to New York that some of the new states were in Great Britain negotiating to ship their products directly from the South to Europe, therefore the northern cities facing losing their monopoly on shipping and finance and facing competition from much lower tariffs on foreign imports via the South that we see a sudden huge upsurge in support for Lincoln's illegal war.
Who were people in the expanding West and along the east Mississippi river networks going to buy their goods from, northern states with 200% tariiffs, or imports via New Orleans with 10%-20% tariffs?