Porn question

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

Who cares? Only prudes. Lol.

My view exactly. Everybody wants to see the first lady's tits in a lesbian porn scene. The so called Christian posters might have a problem with it, but the fact that they voted to have her as first lady proves they are hypocrites anyway.
She didn't run for office, retard.

She is just part of the Orange Cheeto package.
I've never heard of anyone voting for a package. But you retards are weird. I think you're just upset so much of your chocolate Jesus' mess will be cleaned up. Tough shit.
 
76e1eccc89550861ed089a04691e5418.jpg
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:
When I was the resident mod porn meister, I would have had the picture removed... a little blurred would not have been given the time of day....it's simply to skirt the intention of the rules....

we have no restrictions for children posting or perusing here, and no block or disclaimer for children under any age...if we did have a warning or some restrictions for children under the age of 15 or so, then it would be fine and dandy, but we don't have one here on this site....

So this Miss Prude-y, would have ruled to zap it, poof, gone!

:p
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:
When I was the resident mod porn meister, I would have had the picture removed... a little blurred would not have been given the time of day....it's simply to skirt the intention of the rules....

we have no restrictions for children posting or perusing here, and no block or disclaimer for children under any age...if we did have a warning or some restrictions for children under the age of 15 or so, then it would be fine and dandy, but we don't have one here on this site....

So this Miss Prude-y, would have ruled to zap it, poof, gone!

:p
Agree........not suitable for work

Could raise questions
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Here's the answer -- best I know. We had the moderator with the MOST EXPERIENCE in "porn" take a look. And the rules say -- no female nipples, no genitalia of ANY kind. And this Moderator/porn expert said that the "nipples were sufficiently blurred". So it's just like watching Survivor, when they have to blur some parts that have "wardrobe malfunctions" during the rope pull or the mud wrestling.

Can we close this case now?? And no -- you can't ask who it was. The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous.. :mm:
When I was the resident mod porn meister, I would have had the picture removed... a little blurred would not have been given the time of day....it's simply to skirt the intention of the rules....

we have no restrictions for children posting or perusing here, and no block or disclaimer for children under any age...if we did have a warning or some restrictions for children under the age of 15 or so, then it would be fine and dandy, but we don't have one here on this site....

So this Miss Prude-y, would have ruled to zap it, poof, gone!

:p

So you believe that our future first lady's lesbian pictures are porn. I concur. Will a stripper pole be used at all state dinners?
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?
I think it's not porn in the true sense of the word because you can't see genitalia or sexual acts.
Maybe you can call Bulldog's avatar erotic but not pornographic :)

Don't hold back. We both know it is pure sleaze. A future first lady like no other.
 
I wish you an un-merry Christmas. :eusa_dance:

Now I'm depressed. I was hoping you were sending me pictures of you celebrating your career for Christmas.

You want to see pictures of me celebrating my career for Christmas? What does that even mean?

See post #115

Doesn't make any more sense now than when you posted it.

Get someone to explain it to you.
 
I wish you an un-merry Christmas. :eusa_dance:

Now I'm depressed. I was hoping you were sending me pictures of you celebrating your career for Christmas.

You want to see pictures of me celebrating my career for Christmas? What does that even mean?

See post #115

Doesn't make any more sense now than when you posted it.

Get someone to explain it to you.

Why don't you?
 
There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?
I think it's not porn in the true sense of the word because you can't see genitalia or sexual acts.
Maybe you can call Bulldog's avatar erotic but not pornographic :)

Don't hold back. We both know it is pure sleaze. A future first lady like no other.

Apparently Esther doesn't agree with you. Stop trying to bully people into agreeing with your sick views.
 

Forum List

Back
Top