Porn question

[hjmick]

The Staff porn expert wants to remain anonymous..

I bet you do...

 

[Pop23]

Or people with chidren.

What if they're child is a lesbian, then it's cool right?

The left is all for it, till they're not.

You seriously can't make this stuff up folks.

.

Another thing you can't make up is most of the population is to the left of you. I make up the largest segment of the the voting public, the center. Yes, I'm certainly to the left of you and am happy I am to the left of you.
Take your bigoted opinion somewhere else, where folks might care what you think.

Cool, I understand that most of you are sheep. If you can't make a reasoned argument, then the opponent is a homophobe, a bigot, islamaphobe and on and on and on.

That type of thinking brought the end of the blue wall.

Keep it up, makes my job extremely easy.

Carry on

 

[Pop23]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

I really couldn't care less. I've never considered anyone in politics to be a roll model.

If you really want a comparison, that's fine. Do you like your role model ex-president Clinton, who scammed and corrupted his way into authority, and then abused, even raped, every intern he could screw?

Between the two, that's far worse.

Regardless.... BULLDOG... I don't know you, and I don't have a problem with you. But I hate porn. Hate porn. I don't want to see it.

If the ruling is that your avatar if fine, then I'll put you on ignore. Not because I don't want to read what you have to say, but because I hate porn. Nothing personal.

Putting me on ignore won't change the fact that young boys are jerking off to our future first lady's lesbian porn.

No, it won't. Might actually keep a few boys from being "confused", like you for example.

 

[BULLDOG]

Considering the importance the right gave to a blowjob between consenting adults, this is certainly something that should be part of the discussion. The opportunity it gives to point out the hypocrisy of the right is an added bonus. You can start by googling Melania Porn. The first hit will be
Melania Trump’s girl-on-girl photos from racy shoot revealed | New York Post
There are plenty more than that.

That's all from the SAME SINGLE photo shoot. Says so in your link. Max Mag was the only one who printed them.
Photographer says.

“I always loved women together, because I have been with a lot of women who desired the ménage à trois,” said Jarl Ale de Basseville, the French fashion photographer who snapped the pictures.

“This is beauty and not porn. I am always shocked by the porn industry because they are destroying the emotion and the essence of purity and simplicity.”

Here's the dude's picture. Does he look like a sketchy porn producer??

NO !! He looks very Euro and might be LGBTQ himself.
You should actually read the stuff you cut/paste.

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

You forgot one!

As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

Oh NOW I get it. You're just a messenger. A prophet on a mission. To HELP spread the message of that photo shoot. You're innocent. It was MEANT TO BE. and you've taken on the burden of spreading the word.

OK dude -- carry on.. . If you remember 1996, the entire "edgy" setting of those "lesbian shots" was pretty much a POLITICAL STATEMENT. One that many on the left were carrying to mainstream LGBTQ issues and concerns. Was NOT a token whack off exercise. MIGHT have been a Civil Liberties exercise. Have you considered the timing and the message???

Make of it what you want. I just enjoy watching the bible thumpers twist themselves into knots trying to justify those pictures after so many years of their holier than thou rhetoric. I never really thought about that prophet on a mission thing, but that sounds cool too.

Oh me too. I love to watch them twist. It's been my favorite past time since I became politically "homeless" 25 years ago. Know what ELSE I love to watch? Leftists who suddenly become intolerant and not inclusive when it suits their political goals. Getting PREACHY about simple bisexual art and affection. Calling it porn.

It's hysterical man. The whole "tribal conflict" thing that BOTH sides do. It would be even MORE amusing if the two warring tribes weren't RUINING MY COUNTRY in the process.

I'm pretty much a FULL time committed liberal on simple stuff like this. NOT just when my party stands to win the battle. Not a soldier of fortune for hire by a political dynasty. More of a free agent liberal..

If you think I have a problem with those pictures, you are completely missing my point.

 

[flacaltenn]

That's all from the SAME SINGLE photo shoot. Says so in your link. Max Mag was the only one who printed them.
Photographer says.

“I always loved women together, because I have been with a lot of women who desired the ménage à trois,” said Jarl Ale de Basseville, the French fashion photographer who snapped the pictures.

“This is beauty and not porn. I am always shocked by the porn industry because they are destroying the emotion and the essence of purity and simplicity.”

Here's the dude's picture. Does he look like a sketchy porn producer??

NO !! He looks very Euro and might be LGBTQ himself.
You should actually read the stuff you cut/paste.

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.

You forgot one!

As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

Oh NOW I get it. You're just a messenger. A prophet on a mission. To HELP spread the message of that photo shoot. You're innocent. It was MEANT TO BE. and you've taken on the burden of spreading the word.

OK dude -- carry on.. . If you remember 1996, the entire "edgy" setting of those "lesbian shots" was pretty much a POLITICAL STATEMENT. One that many on the left were carrying to mainstream LGBTQ issues and concerns. Was NOT a token whack off exercise. MIGHT have been a Civil Liberties exercise. Have you considered the timing and the message???

Make of it what you want. I just enjoy watching the bible thumpers twist themselves into knots trying to justify those pictures after so many years of their holier than thou rhetoric. I never really thought about that prophet on a mission thing, but that sounds cool too.

Oh me too. I love to watch them twist. It's been my favorite past time since I became politically "homeless" 25 years ago. Know what ELSE I love to watch? Leftists who suddenly become intolerant and not inclusive when it suits their political goals. Getting PREACHY about simple bisexual art and affection. Calling it porn.

It's hysterical man. The whole "tribal conflict" thing that BOTH sides do. It would be even MORE amusing if the two warring tribes weren't RUINING MY COUNTRY in the process.

I'm pretty much a FULL time committed liberal on simple stuff like this. NOT just when my party stands to win the battle. Not a soldier of fortune for hire by a political dynasty. More of a free agent liberal..

If you think I have a problem with those pictures, you are completely missing my point.

We're still AT this ?? I do GET your point. You're trying to sell a legend that we have the first "porn star whore" to be a 1st lady. Andrew Jackson -- who was until this election -- the most famous populist to hijack and screw a major party -- had that SAME LEGEND tossed at HIS wife back in the 1800s. It was a MAJOR campaign scandal.

The difference is those days was -- being a whore a bad thing. And you could not make YOUR CANDIDATES look better by finding a similar whore on the "other side". While in THESE DAYS -- finding a scandalous whore or other tradeable commodity in sin can completely make your "whore" look pure as the driven snow.

So -- instead of celebrating Melania's brave and early depiction of bisexual amory as a GOOD THING if it was your candidate, you load it up as weapon, shoot it at the wall and see if it will stick around as "history re-written". Have at it.. Best of luck. If all this furor over nothing wasn't KILLING MY COUNTRY -- it would be amusing..

You do what good party warriors HAVE to do. I get it. That's why I've spent 20 years trying to wean the public OFF of this 2 tribe conflict and into humble, responsible 3rd party candidates that just want to serve and don't CARE about compromising principles to win power.

 

[BULLDOG]

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.
As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

Oh NOW I get it. You're just a messenger. A prophet on a mission. To HELP spread the message of that photo shoot. You're innocent. It was MEANT TO BE. and you've taken on the burden of spreading the word.

OK dude -- carry on.. . If you remember 1996, the entire "edgy" setting of those "lesbian shots" was pretty much a POLITICAL STATEMENT. One that many on the left were carrying to mainstream LGBTQ issues and concerns. Was NOT a token whack off exercise. MIGHT have been a Civil Liberties exercise. Have you considered the timing and the message???

Make of it what you want. I just enjoy watching the bible thumpers twist themselves into knots trying to justify those pictures after so many years of their holier than thou rhetoric. I never really thought about that prophet on a mission thing, but that sounds cool too.

Oh me too. I love to watch them twist. It's been my favorite past time since I became politically "homeless" 25 years ago. Know what ELSE I love to watch? Leftists who suddenly become intolerant and not inclusive when it suits their political goals. Getting PREACHY about simple bisexual art and affection. Calling it porn.

It's hysterical man. The whole "tribal conflict" thing that BOTH sides do. It would be even MORE amusing if the two warring tribes weren't RUINING MY COUNTRY in the process.

I'm pretty much a FULL time committed liberal on simple stuff like this. NOT just when my party stands to win the battle. Not a soldier of fortune for hire by a political dynasty. More of a free agent liberal..

If you think I have a problem with those pictures, you are completely missing my point.

We're still AT this ?? I do GET your point. You're trying to sell a legend that we have the first "porn star whore" to be a 1st lady. Andrew Jackson -- who was until this election -- the most famous populist to hijack and screw a major party -- had that SAME LEGEND tossed at HIS wife back in the 1800s. It was a MAJOR campaign scandal.

The difference is those days was -- being a whore a bad thing. And you could not make YOUR CANDIDATES look better by finding a similar whore on the "other side". While in THESE DAYS -- finding a scandalous whore or other tradeable commodity in sin can completely make your "whore" look pure as the driven snow.

So -- instead of celebrating Melania's brave and early depiction of bisexual amory as a GOOD THING if it was your candidate, you load it up as weapon, shoot it at the wall and see if it will stick around as "history re-written". Have at it.. Best of luck. If all this furor over nothing wasn't KILLING MY COUNTRY -- it would be amusing..

You do what good party warriors HAVE to do. I get it. That's why I've spent 20 years trying to wean the public OFF of this 2 tribe conflict and into humble, responsible 3rd party candidates that just want to serve and don't CARE about compromising principles to win power.

I'm not sure if the claims against Andrew Jackson's wife were true, but there is no doubt about Trump's wife. You assume I oppose Trump in every way possible out of party loyalty. You are wrong. It doesn't take a liberal to see he is a danger to this country, and with the power of the presidency, the world. No that is not an exaggeration, and I think you know that.

 

[jillian]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

that isn't porn...it's your mail order bride "first lady".

 

[jillian]

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.
As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

Oh NOW I get it. You're just a messenger. A prophet on a mission. To HELP spread the message of that photo shoot. You're innocent. It was MEANT TO BE. and you've taken on the burden of spreading the word.

OK dude -- carry on.. . If you remember 1996, the entire "edgy" setting of those "lesbian shots" was pretty much a POLITICAL STATEMENT. One that many on the left were carrying to mainstream LGBTQ issues and concerns. Was NOT a token whack off exercise. MIGHT have been a Civil Liberties exercise. Have you considered the timing and the message???

Make of it what you want. I just enjoy watching the bible thumpers twist themselves into knots trying to justify those pictures after so many years of their holier than thou rhetoric. I never really thought about that prophet on a mission thing, but that sounds cool too.

Oh me too. I love to watch them twist. It's been my favorite past time since I became politically "homeless" 25 years ago. Know what ELSE I love to watch? Leftists who suddenly become intolerant and not inclusive when it suits their political goals. Getting PREACHY about simple bisexual art and affection. Calling it porn.

It's hysterical man. The whole "tribal conflict" thing that BOTH sides do. It would be even MORE amusing if the two warring tribes weren't RUINING MY COUNTRY in the process.

I'm pretty much a FULL time committed liberal on simple stuff like this. NOT just when my party stands to win the battle. Not a soldier of fortune for hire by a political dynasty. More of a free agent liberal..

If you think I have a problem with those pictures, you are completely missing my point.

We're still AT this ?? I do GET your point. You're trying to sell a legend that we have the first "porn star whore" to be a 1st lady. Andrew Jackson -- who was until this election -- the most famous populist to hijack and screw a major party -- had that SAME LEGEND tossed at HIS wife back in the 1800s. It was a MAJOR campaign scandal.

The difference is those days was -- being a whore a bad thing. And you could not make YOUR CANDIDATES look better by finding a similar whore on the "other side". While in THESE DAYS -- finding a scandalous whore or other tradeable commodity in sin can completely make your "whore" look pure as the driven snow.

So -- instead of celebrating Melania's brave and early depiction of bisexual amory as a GOOD THING if it was your candidate, you load it up as weapon, shoot it at the wall and see if it will stick around as "history re-written". Have at it.. Best of luck. If all this furor over nothing wasn't KILLING MY COUNTRY -- it would be amusing..

You do what good party warriors HAVE to do. I get it. That's why I've spent 20 years trying to wean the public OFF of this 2 tribe conflict and into humble, responsible 3rd party candidates that just want to serve and don't CARE about compromising principles to win power.

it wasn't porn.

but she is a mail order bride who sold herself to a rich man for money.

is that being a whore? *shrug*

 

[ChrisL]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

You forgot one!

That one's not real. Just another smear on a First Lady.
Melanoma is who she is.

As you smear the future first lady? Melania is not a corrupt politician.

 

[ChrisL]

Doesn't matter. Her pictures are jerk bait across the internet. Distributed as widely as possible, just like she intended.
As usual, a right winger posts a fake picture. If it wasn't for lies, the right would have nothing.

Oh NOW I get it. You're just a messenger. A prophet on a mission. To HELP spread the message of that photo shoot. You're innocent. It was MEANT TO BE. and you've taken on the burden of spreading the word.

OK dude -- carry on.. . If you remember 1996, the entire "edgy" setting of those "lesbian shots" was pretty much a POLITICAL STATEMENT. One that many on the left were carrying to mainstream LGBTQ issues and concerns. Was NOT a token whack off exercise. MIGHT have been a Civil Liberties exercise. Have you considered the timing and the message???

Make of it what you want. I just enjoy watching the bible thumpers twist themselves into knots trying to justify those pictures after so many years of their holier than thou rhetoric. I never really thought about that prophet on a mission thing, but that sounds cool too.

Oh me too. I love to watch them twist. It's been my favorite past time since I became politically "homeless" 25 years ago. Know what ELSE I love to watch? Leftists who suddenly become intolerant and not inclusive when it suits their political goals. Getting PREACHY about simple bisexual art and affection. Calling it porn.

It's hysterical man. The whole "tribal conflict" thing that BOTH sides do. It would be even MORE amusing if the two warring tribes weren't RUINING MY COUNTRY in the process.

I'm pretty much a FULL time committed liberal on simple stuff like this. NOT just when my party stands to win the battle. Not a soldier of fortune for hire by a political dynasty. More of a free agent liberal..

If you think I have a problem with those pictures, you are completely missing my point.

We're still AT this ?? I do GET your point. You're trying to sell a legend that we have the first "porn star whore" to be a 1st lady. Andrew Jackson -- who was until this election -- the most famous populist to hijack and screw a major party -- had that SAME LEGEND tossed at HIS wife back in the 1800s. It was a MAJOR campaign scandal.

The difference is those days was -- being a whore a bad thing. And you could not make YOUR CANDIDATES look better by finding a similar whore on the "other side". While in THESE DAYS -- finding a scandalous whore or other tradeable commodity in sin can completely make your "whore" look pure as the driven snow.

So -- instead of celebrating Melania's brave and early depiction of bisexual amory as a GOOD THING if it was your candidate, you load it up as weapon, shoot it at the wall and see if it will stick around as "history re-written". Have at it.. Best of luck. If all this furor over nothing wasn't KILLING MY COUNTRY -- it would be amusing..

You do what good party warriors HAVE to do. I get it. That's why I've spent 20 years trying to wean the public OFF of this 2 tribe conflict and into humble, responsible 3rd party candidates that just want to serve and don't CARE about compromising principles to win power.

Very true. Some very good points made there, Mr. Flacaltenn.

 

[Iceweasel]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

Who cares? Only prudes. Lol.

My view exactly. Everybody wants to see the first lady's tits in a lesbian porn scene. The so called Christian posters might have a problem with it, but the fact that they voted to have her as first lady proves they are hypocrites anyway.

She didn't run for office, retard.

 

[BULLDOG]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

You forgot one!

That one's not real. Just another smear on a First Lady.
Melanoma is who she is.

As you smear the future first lady? Melania is not a corrupt politician.

Nope, she's married to one. She is a lesbian porn model.

 

[BULLDOG]

Aren't you proud of your new lesbian porn model/ first lady? That is her, and the picture wasn't taken by some peeping tom looking through a window. She intentionally posed for it with the intention of it being distributed as widely as possible. The first time any first lady has intentionally put lesbian porn on the internet for anybody to look at while they jerk off. Real class that Trump clown is bringing to the White House.

Who cares? Only prudes. Lol.

My view exactly. Everybody wants to see the first lady's tits in a lesbian porn scene. The so called Christian posters might have a problem with it, but the fact that they voted to have her as first lady proves they are hypocrites anyway.

She didn't run for office, retard.

She is just part of the Orange Cheeto package.

 

[ChrisL]

There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.

Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

You forgot one!

That one's not real. Just another smear on a First Lady.
Melanoma is who she is.

As you smear the future first lady? Melania is not a corrupt politician.

Nope, she's married to one. She is a lesbian porn model.

No she isn't.

 

[rightwinger]

I consider it to be art, not porn

It celebrates the career of our new First "Lady"

 

[BULLDOG]

Don't talk about our First Lady that way.

You forgot one!

That one's not real. Just another smear on a First Lady.
Melanoma is who she is.

As you smear the future first lady? Melania is not a corrupt politician.

Nope, she's married to one. She is a lesbian porn model.

No she isn't.

Are you trying that old Jedi mind trick? "This is not the lesbian porn model you're looking for" Of course it's her.

 

[ChrisL]

I consider it to be art, not porn

It celebrates the career of our new First "Lady"

Her career 20 years ago. What were you doing 20 years ago. I'll bet if someone offered you thousands of dollars, you would pose for a gay photo shoot.

 

[ChrisL]

You forgot one!

That one's not real. Just another smear on a First Lady.
Melanoma is who she is.

As you smear the future first lady? Melania is not a corrupt politician.

Nope, she's married to one. She is a lesbian porn model.

No she isn't.

Are you trying that old Jedi mind trick? "This is not the lesbian porn model you're looking for" Of course it's her.

That was 20 years ago, moron.

 

[ChrisL]

Damn, I hate you people. Lol.

 

[BULLDOG]

I consider it to be art, not porn

It celebrates the career of our new First "Lady"

Good for you. I saw several women displaying their art at a titty bar last night. I'm sure they were celebrating their careers too.