esthermoon
Gold Member
I understand it can be unusual for Americans (and for the rest of the world) having a first lady who did nude photos in the past but pornography is a completely different thingI think it's not porn in the true sense of the word because you can't see genitalia or sexual acts.There's a member, BULLDOG, who has what I consider porn as an avatar.
Is that permitted? Do I have to place him on ignore, or can you just have him change it?
Maybe you can call Bulldog's avatar erotic but not pornographic
Don't hold back. We both know it is pure sleaze. A future first lady like no other.