No, this is not the other side. Killing a burgler is not the same thing as going hunting for black kids.
It worries me that people can't see the difference.
it should.
A dead black is a dead black no matter how you slice it I guess.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, this is not the other side. Killing a burgler is not the same thing as going hunting for black kids.
It worries me that people can't see the difference.
it should.
He used a weapon in self-defense.Not in Chicago, you're not. You might hurt your burglar's/rapist's/murderer's feelings.
No, the moral action is to be robbed/raped/murdered. Undoubtedly.
Right, bleeding heart USMB lefties?
Wright was charged with one felony count of unlawful use of a weapon after police discovered he had two prior weapons convictions from 1968 and 1994, officials said. Records show Wright also was convicted of theft in 1990. Wright turned his gun over to detectives.
Do you suppose the reasons why he was charged have anything to do with self defense ???
In Liberal Land, that's a baaaaad thing.
Yet you seem to have no problem with the double standard of Sharpton, Jackson, the media et al ignoring black-on-black crime while they stir up race hate with Hispanic-on-black crime.Oh look....
This is what he was charged with. Not murder.
I'll lay odds the DA refuses to prosecute. "Unlawful use of a weapon" could mean something as simple as violating some law against firing a handgun in city limits. He was not charged with assault or attempted murder. He also shot the burglar in the leg once, he didn't murder him.
The whole idea of the thread is a lame, and false attempt at trying to establish some equivalency to justify their own bigotry, because we're hoppin' mad at the double standards of justice shown in Florida. This makes the thread a huge FAIL!
Nope. You have no problem at all with that double standard.
There is no double standard. In Chicago, the cops did their job....in Florida, the cops did not do their job. In Chicago, that man defended himself and his home. In Florida, that man went AFTER someone walking home from the 7-11.
Of course.....we don't expect YOU to see the difference. In fact, it's actually amusing watching the OP try to shoehorn an different case into a comparison with the Florida case in an attempt to accuse Liberals of racial hypocrisy......and what does he do? Pick an example based on......wait for it.........race.
There is no double standard. In Chicago, the cops did their job....in Florida, the cops did not do their job. In Chicago, that man defended himself and his home. In Florida, that man went AFTER someone walking home from the 7-11.
Of course.....we don't expect YOU to see the difference. In fact, it's actually amusing watching the OP try to shoehorn an different case into a comparison with the Florida case in an attempt to accuse Liberals of racial hypocrisy......and what does he do? Pick an example based on......wait for it.........race.
Yeah, obviously if a man were to go rob a 7/11, and shot the storekeeper after a struggle, that would also be the same thing as killing a burglar in the process of breaking into your home.
After all, the shopkeeper was trying to fight the man committing the hold-up. Obviously a case of self defense.
Yes, that is correct.
Yet you seem to have no problem with the double standard of Sharpton, Jackson, the media et al ignoring black-on-black crime while they stir up race hate with Hispanic-on-black crime.Oh look....
This is what he was charged with. Not murder.
I'll lay odds the DA refuses to prosecute. "Unlawful use of a weapon" could mean something as simple as violating some law against firing a handgun in city limits. He was not charged with assault or attempted murder. He also shot the burglar in the leg once, he didn't murder him.
The whole idea of the thread is a lame, and false attempt at trying to establish some equivalency to justify their own bigotry, because we're hoppin' mad at the double standards of justice shown in Florida. This makes the thread a huge FAIL!
Nope. You have no problem at all with that double standard.
Yes, that is correct.
I was being sarcastic.
One is justifiable homicide, the other is not.
Yes, that is correct.
I was being sarcastic.
One is justifiable homicide, the other is not.
I know, I was too.
I was being sarcastic.
One is justifiable homicide, the other is not.
I know, I was too.
Whew, had me worried for a minute.
How about IL State's Attorney Anita Alvarez?He used a weapon in self-defense.Do you suppose the reasons why he was charged have anything to do with self defense ???
In Liberal Land, that's a baaaaad thing.
So, you have evidence of Liberals saying this man in Chicago was bad for defending himself and his home? Link of that, please.
How do you know the cops in FL didn't do their job?Yet you seem to have no problem with the double standard of Sharpton, Jackson, the media et al ignoring black-on-black crime while they stir up race hate with Hispanic-on-black crime.I'll lay odds the DA refuses to prosecute. "Unlawful use of a weapon" could mean something as simple as violating some law against firing a handgun in city limits. He was not charged with assault or attempted murder. He also shot the burglar in the leg once, he didn't murder him.
The whole idea of the thread is a lame, and false attempt at trying to establish some equivalency to justify their own bigotry, because we're hoppin' mad at the double standards of justice shown in Florida. This makes the thread a huge FAIL!
Nope. You have no problem at all with that double standard.
There is no double standard. In Chicago, the cops did their job....in Florida, the cops did not do their job. In Chicago, that man defended himself and his home. In Florida, that man went AFTER someone walking home from the 7-11.
Of course.....we don't expect YOU to see the difference. In fact, it's actually amusing watching the OP try to shoehorn an different case into a comparison with the Florida case in an attempt to accuse Liberals of racial hypocrisy......and what does he do? Pick an example based on......wait for it.........race.
Links.Yet you seem to have no problem with the double standard of Sharpton, Jackson, the media et al ignoring black-on-black crime while they stir up race hate with Hispanic-on-black crime.I'll lay odds the DA refuses to prosecute. "Unlawful use of a weapon" could mean something as simple as violating some law against firing a handgun in city limits. He was not charged with assault or attempted murder. He also shot the burglar in the leg once, he didn't murder him.
The whole idea of the thread is a lame, and false attempt at trying to establish some equivalency to justify their own bigotry, because we're hoppin' mad at the double standards of justice shown in Florida. This makes the thread a huge FAIL!
Nope. You have no problem at all with that double standard.
As usual your premise is bullshit. They've often commented on black-on-black crime.
I don't watch Fox. But I understand that since you need to be programmed daily, you feel others do too.If you stopped watching FOX every now and then, you'd know this.
Even if they have to make up the discrimination. SEE Tawana Brawley, the Duke Lacrosse Team.But their day job is to see that blacks aren't discriminated against. That's what they do.
I do only because they are.Too bad you consider those working for social justice, race baiting poverty pimps.
"Social justice" means "Taking stuff away from people who earned it and giving it to people who don't".Why do you hate social justice?
Links.Yet you seem to have no problem with the double standard of Sharpton, Jackson, the media et al ignoring black-on-black crime while they stir up race hate with Hispanic-on-black crime.
Nope. You have no problem at all with that double standard.
As usual your premise is bullshit. They've often commented on black-on-black crime.
"We must be outraged when people who look like us, live with us and claim to be us, kill us," said Sharpton, who was accompanied by ministers, Nation of Islam organizers and Yamma Brown, an activist and daughter of Sharpton's mentor, the late James Brown.
GATES: But what do we do about it?
Jackson: One must challenge that violent culture. One must challenge those stereotypes. At least you must know, as a professor, that there's a competition for the minds of our children. You teach four, five, ten, twelve, twenty students. And mass media is teaching by the tens of thousands.
GATES: Right.
JACKSON: And it's winning. And not only is it conditioning our youth toward recycling violence; it's also immunizing them away from the pain of drugs as a threat to their lives. It is immunizing them from the pain of even death, where many of our young people now who are planning their funerals, what kind of funeral they're going to have. That is a mindset. And the more you focus on sex without love, and drugs and violence, lifestyle of intimidation and recycling, the less energy you spend on opening up the big tent.
I do only because they are.Too bad you consider those working for social justice, race baiting poverty pimps.
"Social justice" means "Taking stuff away from people who earned it and giving it to people who don't".Why do you hate social justice?
You want to assuage your white liberal guilt, fine. But keep your hands out of my wallet. I've never owned a slave, and I've never oppressed anybody.
And no, disagreeing with leftists is NOT oppression.
I was indeed wrong, and good for them.Links.As usual your premise is bullshit. They've often commented on black-on-black crime.
Damn you're lazy.
Sharpton decries black-on-black violence
Jesse Jackson
Ready to admit you were wrong and uninformed?
Sooo...you got nothin', and it's MY fault.I do only because they are.
"Social justice" means "Taking stuff away from people who earned it and giving it to people who don't".Why do you hate social justice?
You want to assuage your white liberal guilt, fine. But keep your hands out of my wallet. I've never owned a slave, and I've never oppressed anybody.
And no, disagreeing with leftists is NOT oppression.
You sound like a deranged parrot. I won't explain to you the difference between social justice and economic justice, it would be like pissing in a fan, and I don't think you have the level of intelligence to discuss it without going back to your talking point dogma. If someone here, on the right, who shows an ounce of intelligence wish to discuss why social and economic justice isn't wealth redistribution, I'd be happy to. You're just too lazy, shiftless, and ignorant.
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
The obvious other side of the coin.
Are we allowed to defend ourselves or not.
I was indeed wrong, and good for them.Links.
Damn you're lazy.
Sharpton decries black-on-black violence
Jesse Jackson
Ready to admit you were wrong and uninformed?
Too bad they erase all the good they do with articles like that by race-baiting.
Wouldn't you say?
Sooo...you got nothin', and it's MY fault.I do only because they are.
"Social justice" means "Taking stuff away from people who earned it and giving it to people who don't".
You want to assuage your white liberal guilt, fine. But keep your hands out of my wallet. I've never owned a slave, and I've never oppressed anybody.
And no, disagreeing with leftists is NOT oppression.
You sound like a deranged parrot. I won't explain to you the difference between social justice and economic justice, it would be like pissing in a fan, and I don't think you have the level of intelligence to discuss it without going back to your talking point dogma. If someone here, on the right, who shows an ounce of intelligence wish to discuss why social and economic justice isn't wealth redistribution, I'd be happy to. You're just too lazy, shiftless, and ignorant.
The day a leftist takes personal responsible for something is the day...hell, even I don't have that much imagination.
Woonder how long it will take Sharpton and Jackson to hotfoot it to Chicago??
Not in Chicago, you're not. You might hurt your burglar's/rapist's/murderer's feelings.Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
The obvious other side of the coin.
Are we allowed to defend ourselves or not.
No, the moral action is to be robbed/raped/murdered. Undoubtedly.
Right, bleeding heart USMB lefties?