Mr.Nick
VIP Member
- May 10, 2011
- 9,604
- 719
- 83
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
The obvious other side of the coin.
Are we allowed to defend ourselves or not.
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
If you went to the Chicago Tribune article you would see both mug shots.
Not in Chicago, you're not. You might hurt your burglar's/rapist's/murderer's feelings.
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
The obvious other side of the coin.
Are we allowed to defend ourselves or not.
Black-on-black crime? Pffft. There's no money to be made off that.Woonder how long it will take Sharpton and Jackson to hotfoot it to Chicago??
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
If you went to the Chicago Tribune article you would see both mug shots.
I did. Hence, I was able to ascertain that the Tribune did not see the need to mention the races of either man in their article, so I was wondering why you felt it was necesssary in your thread title?
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
Woonder how long it will take Sharpton and Jackson to hotfoot it to Chicago??
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
The obvious other side of the coin.
Are we allowed to defend ourselves or not.
IMHO, by stating "black man shoots black intruder", the OP had no intention of discussing our rights to defend ourselves...
Black-on-black crime? Pffft. There's no money to be made off that.Woonder how long it will take Sharpton and Jackson to hotfoot it to Chicago??
Besides, it just points out the black community's leaders' failures. No way they're going to highlight that.
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
Black-on-black crime? Pffft. There's no money to be made off that.Woonder how long it will take Sharpton and Jackson to hotfoot it to Chicago??
Besides, it just points out the black community's leaders' failures. No way they're going to highlight that.
I know. I was being facesious/
Sharpton and Jackson are media whores and the only black deaths they are interested in are anybody but a black killing a black.
God know hundeds of blacks are killed by other blacks every year. Sharpton and Jackson have no interest in those deaths because they can't scream racism.
Black-on-black crime? Pffft. There's no money to be made off that.Woonder how long it will take Sharpton and Jackson to hotfoot it to Chicago??
Besides, it just points out the black community's leaders' failures. No way they're going to highlight that.
I know. I was being facesious/
Sharpton and Jackson are media whores and the only black deaths they are interested in are anybody but a black killing a black.
God know hundeds of blacks are killed by other blacks every year. Sharpton and Jackson have no interest in those deaths because they can't scream racism.
The obvious other side of the coin.
Are we allowed to defend ourselves or not.
IMHO, by stating "black man shoots black intruder", the OP had no intention of discussing our rights to defend ourselves...
Oh fuck off...
Kindly explain the similarities between this incident and the one in Florida....particularly in the following sticking points.
1. did the 80 year old man call 911?
2. was the 80 year old man following the "burglar" outside his own house/property?
3. was the 80 year old man told by the police dispatcher to not follow the "burgler" and he did it anyways?
4. was the "burglar" walking in an open area?
5. did he had the dreaded hoodie on?
6. was he packing skittles?
7. did the police do nothing after a cursery investigation?
8. are the parents of the "burglar" asking why nothing is being done by the police dept 3 weeks later?