Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mr.Nick, Mar 27, 2012.
Neighbors 'outraged' after man, 80, charged after shooting burglar - chicagotribune.com
Since the heading of your linked news article did not mention the race of the shooter, nor the burglar, why did you feel it was necessary to mention their races in your thread title?
The obvious other side of the coin.
Are we allowed to defend ourselves or not.
If you went to the Chicago Tribune article you would see both mug shots.
IMHO, by stating "black man shoots black intruder", the OP had no intention of discussing our rights to defend ourselves...
I did. Hence, I was able to ascertain that the Tribune did not see the need to mention the races of either man in their article, so I was wondering why you felt it was necesssary in your thread title?
Woonder how long it will take Sharpton and Jackson to hotfoot it to Chicago??
Not in Chicago, you're not. You might hurt your burglar's/rapist's/murderer's feelings.
No, the moral action is to be robbed/raped/murdered. Undoubtedly.
Right, bleeding heart USMB lefties?
Black-on-black crime? Pffft. There's no money to be made off that.
Besides, it just points out the black community's leaders' failures. No way they're going to highlight that.
Are you colorblind or just blind?
They have the mugs posted - not to mention a gigantic video of the incident leading the story off...
Separate names with a comma.