History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.
Bullshit. History reveals no such thing.
Lots of people attended lynchings. Some took pictures. Some made postcards. Some even bought and sold body parts as souvenirs.
NONE of them stood on the side checking voter registrations. Dumbass.
During the Senate debates on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, it was revealed that members of the Democratic Party formed many terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to murder and intimidate African Americans voters.
Bullshit.
The Ku Klux Klan was founded by six Confederate war vets in Pulaski, Tennessee. Not by a political party. Several other regional terrorist organizations were formed around the same time -- White League; Red Caps; Knights of the White Camellia ... and others. NONE of them were formed by political parties.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act Roll Call Vote: In the House, only 64 percent of the Democrats (153 yes, 91 no), but 80 percent of the Republicans (136 yes, 35 no), voted for it. In the Senate, while only 68 percent of the Democrats endorsed the bill (46 yes, 21 no), 82 percent of the Republicans voted to enact it (27 yes, 6 no).
Bullshit.
Actually more Ds than Rs voted for it, but that's not significant. Here's what is:.
I got your pattern right here, Pal -- the one you're so desperately trying to smokescreen:
The original House version:
- Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
- Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
- >>> ALL SOUTHERNERS: 7-97 (6.7%--93.3%)
The Senate version:
- Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94 – 6%)
- Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85 – 15%)
- >>> ALL NORTHERNERS: 283-33 (89.6%--11.4%)
- Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%)
- Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%)
- Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%)
- Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)
- ALL SOUTHERNERS: 1--21 (4.5%--95.5%)
- ALL NORTHERNERS: 72--6 (92.3%--7.7%)
Yes, there is a party pattern in that each line shows more support from the D side than the R side. But again, 94 versus 85 on one side is not significant.
But 96 on one side versus 92 on the other side?? You just hit the motherlode. The numbers don't lie; your pattern is clearly there but it's regional, not political. And regional, once again for you slow readers who can't think of a point on your own and crutch on Googly Image Bullshit, means cultural.
You take the numbers from the North -- both Dems and Repubs are for it.
You take the numbers from the South -- both Dems and Repubs are agin' it.
It's truly bipartisan in both directions.
Maybe you should break down and buy a history book, Dumbass.
And again, there is no such thing as a "Democrat Party". There never has been.
Here you go, the vote count on the 1957 Civil Rights act...
HR 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957. PASSED. YEA SUPPORTS PRESIDENT S POSITION. -- GovTrack.us
Senate...
HR. 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957. PASSED. -- GovTrack.us
Goldwater voted for it....
As did this guy...there were almost no republican Senators in the south at this point,
Yea R Revercomb, William WV
That is why the racist democrats forget about the Civil Rights acts before the 1964 civil rights act....they can hide their racism and lie about the Republicans true feelings......
Interesting how you couldn't handle the topic -- the 1964 CRA, clearly spelled out by the gay Pink boy -- and had to shift to a different legislation altogether. Why is that? You're a coward, or a liar?