P F Tinmore, et al,
No, you have it wrong.
(COMMENT)(ii) The territory defended against the Aggressor Arab League and Hostile Arab Palestinians was peaceful, over a significant period.
The territory has never been peaceful as required.
Today, the physically erected border between Israel and the West Bank is the first area of consideration. The area East of the erected border is considered the West Bank. And you would be correct. That particular area is dominated be Hostile Area Palestinians, and has not been peaceful. However, the West side of the boundary, has not had a history of an insurgency, or a jihadist movement operating and creating a lack of law and order. It has been relatively peaceful; except for Hostile Arab Palestinians that infiltrate.
Similarly, the boundary around the Gaza Strip has a very Hostile Arab Palestinian content. But on the Israeli side of the boundary, there is a remarkable peaceful environment.
In both cases, law and order --- or --- the threat to the peace or acts of aggression, were then --- and are now --- originating largely from Hostile Arab Palestinians in residence outside Israel and mostly from the West Bank, Gaza Strip area.
It should be noted that virtually nothing associated with the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, contributes to a peaceful and positive developing culture.
Most Respectfully,
R
I wonder how an area that is occupied and patrolled by the Vicious Israeli Occupier (VIO) can be considered dominated by the occupied. It is "Rocco LogicTM".
Demographics, which you are a self convinced expert on the way you use them to advocate violence against the Jews.