Journalists are in danger in Israel because of knife assassin's actions

[browsing deer]

An assassin tried to kill a soldier. He died.

The man was carrying cameras, but no film, and wearing a "press" shirt. he obviously thought he could get close enough to do real damage. It didn't work, but from now on the soldiers are going to be a great deal more leery of these guys. Israel's attitude of shoot first, second, and third, ask questions a great deal later will be extended to the press.

Of course, the way the legitimate (ha!) press behaves, is pretty bad too. A reporter for NBC said that an assassin carrying a large knife was unarmed was called on it by the news anchor. A reporter this dishonest needs to be fired. He will probably get a raise

 

[Humanity]

An assassin tried to kill a soldier. He died

I guess he tried and succeeded then!

 

[browsing deer]

Nope. Total abject failure. Superficial, wounds only.

The assassin is dead. May he enjoy his time in hell.

 

[Lipush]

Amen.

 

[montelatici]

An assassin tried to kill a soldier. He died.

The man was carrying cameras, but no film, and wearing a "press" shirt. he obviously thought he could get close enough to do real damage. It didn't work, but from now on the soldiers are going to be a great deal more leery of these guys. Israel's attitude of shoot first, second, and third, ask questions a great deal later will be extended to the press.

Of course, the way the legitimate (ha!) press behaves, is pretty bad too. A reporter for NBC said that an assassin carrying a large knife was unarmed was called on it by the news anchor. A reporter this dishonest needs to be fired. He will probably get a raise

They still use film?

 

[montelatici]

Occupied people have every right to attack and kill occupation troops.

"After effective occupation of territory, members of the territory’s armed forces who have not surrendered, organized resistance movements and genuine national liberation movements may resist the occupation..."

The Law of Armed Conflict

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf

 

[RoccoR]

montelatici, et al,

Again, you are attempting to spread disinformation. You did not read the entire passage

Occupied people have every right to attack and kill occupation troops.

"After effective occupation of territory, members of the territory’s armed forces who have not surrendered, organized resistance movements and genuine national liberation movements may resist the occupation..."

The Law of Armed Conflict

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf

(FROM YOUR TRAINING PAMPHLET)

RESISTANCE TO OCCUPATION

After effective occupation of territory, members of the territory’s armed forces who have not surrendered, organized resistance movements and genuine national liberation movements may resist the occupation. If they do so, they must distinguish themselves from the civilian population, or on the basis of GP I, at least carry their weapons openly during attacks and deployments.

Civilians who take a direct part in such hostilities lose their protection against attack for the time of their direct participation, but not their civilian status. If they do not participate directly in hostilities or no longer do so (for example, if they are hors de combat), they are protected against attacks. You know this from the lesson on the conduct of operations.

Indirect support for the resistance movement, such as providing information or non-military supplies, does not constitute taking a direct part in hostilities. Those so engaged are civilians and therefore protected against attack. They may, however, be in contravention of security laws passed by the occupying power. In that case, they can be tried and sentenced or their freedom of movement restricted.
​

PENALTIES

Minor offences are punishable only by internment or simple imprisonment. [Slide 11]

Serious offences may be punishable by death. The law of armed conflict in no way, however, sanctions the death penalty, which many States worldwide have now banned. What it says is that if the death penalty still exists in the occupied territory and the serious offences listed below were punishable by death before the occupation began, then and only then can the death penalty be imposed.

Serious offences are exclusively:

• espionage;
• serious acts of sabotage against the occupying power’s military installations;
• intentional acts causing the death of one or more persons, insofar as the national law in effect prior to occupation allows the death penalty for such acts.
​

(COMMENT)

This is a classic example of how the Hostile Arab Palestinian is always looking for a way to pursue conflict and hostile action; and not peace and negotiation. They are always looking for a way to kill , as oppose to assuming a peaceful role.

It seems to be the predominant character trait most observed to be exhibited by people in support of Hostile Arab Palestinian activities.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

An assassin tried to kill a soldier. He died

I guess he tried and succeeded then!

Once again you show that English is a foreign language as far as you are concerned.


To make it easier for you troll The assassin tried to stab a soldier and was killed in the process, it was the Palestinians islamonazi terrorist that was killed and he failed in his mission.

 

[Phoenall]

An assassin tried to kill a soldier. He died.

The man was carrying cameras, but no film, and wearing a "press" shirt. he obviously thought he could get close enough to do real damage. It didn't work, but from now on the soldiers are going to be a great deal more leery of these guys. Israel's attitude of shoot first, second, and third, ask questions a great deal later will be extended to the press.

Of course, the way the legitimate (ha!) press behaves, is pretty bad too. A reporter for NBC said that an assassin carrying a large knife was unarmed was called on it by the news anchor. A reporter this dishonest needs to be fired. He will probably get a raise

They still use film?

Yes for the better quality you can get using large format film. Not everyone has a Hassleblad with 100 trillion megapixels

 

[Phoenall]

Occupied people have every right to attack and kill occupation troops.

"After effective occupation of territory, members of the territory’s armed forces who have not surrendered, organized resistance movements and genuine national liberation movements may resist the occupation..."

The Law of Armed Conflict

https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/law9_final.pdf

Just as the occupation forces have the right to respond and kill those who try. If the dead of the terrorists exceed those of the occupation forces then it is time to sue for peace and an end to the occupation

 

[Humanity]

An assassin tried to kill a soldier. He died

I guess he tried and succeeded then!

Once again you show that English is a foreign language as far as you are concerned.


To make it easier for you troll The assassin tried to stab a soldier and was killed in the process, it was the Palestinians islamonazi terrorist that was killed and he failed in his mission.

If illiterates like yourself cannot communicate their point clearly, succinctly then what is a poor guy to do?

 

[Humanity]

Just as the occupation forces have the right to respond and kill

Dummy!

The "occupation forces" have NO right to BE there, let alone murder 'freedom fighters'!

 

[Phoenall]

An assassin tried to kill a soldier. He died

I guess he tried and succeeded then!

Once again you show that English is a foreign language as far as you are concerned.


To make it easier for you troll The assassin tried to stab a soldier and was killed in the process, it was the Palestinians islamonazi terrorist that was killed and he failed in his mission.

If illiterates like yourself cannot communicate their point clearly, succinctly then what is a poor guy to do?

You could try getting a proper education, then you would know when you were wrong and showing yourself up

 

[Phoenall]

Just as the occupation forces have the right to respond and kill

Dummy!

The "occupation forces" have NO right to BE there, let alone murder 'freedom fighters'!

Cite the international laws that say this, and the dates of their implementation. Even the UN, ICC and ICJ have said the occupation is legal, just not the separation barrier.