Avorysuds
Gold Member
See post 36.
I'm tired of our candidates acting like they're in a highschool debate class.
Stop the bullshit and give me the plan not platitudes.
Quick search and this is what I found off Paul's site Rick Santorum "Proud" to Support Pro-Choice Arlen Specter*|*Ron Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Committee
:
Rick Santorums endorsement of Arlen Specter, a strong supporter of abortion is becoming a key issue as the Iowa caucuses near.Past that all I found was Santorum "blames" Paul for the robo calls that said Santorum was anti second amendment and pro choice... Meaning as far as I can tell Paul never said it, Santorum just claims someone supporting Paul did....
If you can find me a quote of Paul saying Santorum is pro choice and anti the second amendment I'll look into it.
Santorum supported Specter for a very specific reason. Because Specter promised him that if he and the President did, Specter would fight to get Bush's judicial nominees through confirmation. Which he did.
We have two solid pro constitution judges on the bench because of that, despite the fact that it did hurt Santorum politically. I support Rick's choice there and I completely understand it. Sometimes you have to make friends who don't support your issues to get your issues through.
Sure, but the quote is not Paul calling Santorum pro choice or anti the second amendment... It's that Santorum stumped for someone that was.
All I did was correct Gramps and prove links and proof. All I asked was for quotes from gramps or anyone else backing up the OP's claims. That is all.
Santorum has a lot of baggage, I nor Paul have to lie to get Santorum, Santorum on the other hand lied to attack Paul and in some cases it worked... IE, Gramps started a thread and part of it was about Paul, yet the part about Paul was simply not true. Odd how that seems to be the case with Paul haters more often than not, they have half truths and lies, just like Gramps stated was a bad thing in the OP.