Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
@ nickd
Your tax bracket will not reach 49%. Show it to me, you might actually convince me to change my vote. Otherwise retract the statement.
One reason I will vote for Obama, but not the only reason, is that during the campaign every other major political figure in the elections has eventually come round to following his lead.
Clinton did it on the Iraq pullout.
Bush also did it on the pullout.
McCain did it on calling for unity between parties, on picking a rock star running mate, and a few other things.
People follow him, even the other side follows him. They recognize his good judgement, and so do I.
Another reason that I will vote for obama is because his team is phenomenally organized and disciplined. He out-organized Clinton, he out-disciplined her too, and he tops McCain here too.
He's the leader in the field.
One reason I won't for McCain is because he can't keep Sunni and Shia straight, and that seems pretty critical if the greatest threat to us is islamofascism in the middle east. Obama doesn't confuse these groups, incidentally.
So... what is this "change" you think you're going to get with hussein, other than higher taxes and government fucked up health care?
I will only vote in this election because of Palin. My purpose would be to show my support for the person who most closely represents a conservative outsider.
The reason I'm going to vote for Obama is that I believe, in the privacy of my own mind, that he outfoxed the owners of both political parties by usurping Hillary and those check books are nervous about about there own futures for the first time in 20 years.
For the first election in my 36 years of voting I am excited about an election.
Not because I'm an 'Obama zombie, it's just that this is the first election I've ever seen that was not scripted by the checkbooks that prop up both the DNC and the RNC.
This isn't about Obama, it's about change. Change I am deciding to buy into because there is already something different. This election.
I know, I know... that was more than one reason - I can't help it... I'm excited!
-Joe
-Joe
Why? Someone has to pay for Bush's war.
Bush's war??? Congress didnt vote on it and fund it?
This is about the uptenth time you posted this and been debunked. Presidents don't control spending, Congress does....
Please show me some change that Obama is responsable for. Talking it, dont make it so. He is less likely to change things than anyone else running. Dont delude yourself.
ANd when you talk about all the taxes you pay on top of income taxes, fees, charges, (look at your phone bill, cable bill, etc, etc. )yea, 49% isnt far fetched for a middle class person. ANd obama, correct me if Im wrong, opposes keeping the income tax cuts, which is the same as raising them.
Please show me some change that Obama is responsable for. Talking it, dont make it so. He is less likely to change things than anyone else running. Dont delude yourself.
ANd when you talk about all the taxes you pay on top of income taxes, fees, charges, (look at your phone bill, cable bill, etc, etc. )yea, 49% isnt far fetched for a middle class person. ANd obama, correct me if Im wrong, opposes keeping the income tax cuts, which is the same as raising them.
clearly SPAMMING for themAre you a plant from Comedy Central? Curious -
And for the first 6 years, who controlled Congress again?
Meh, i fault both parties for spending like drunken sailors and that might be an insult to drunken sailor(any Navy vets on the forum, not meant as an insult)For Bush's terms Republicans, Reagan's presidency was controlled by Democrats. Let me ask you this though, why is it, that the defecit is larger than ever before in US history? With whom in charge?
I'll assume from your statement that you have not read Obamas tax plan on his website, or you are sittin' pretty high up on this ol' hog we call America.
The fact of Obamas youth and lack of accomplishments in our current political system is the one thing that gives me hope in his candidacy.
Instead of wasting his time playing the profitable game that Washington has become since World War II. He spent his time figuring out how he could help take our government back for people like his mom, who died too young. We don't need the best player of the game in DC. We need a leader who can help We, The People wrest the government back from the deep pockets who have been buying up and consolidating power like they buy up and consolidate profitable enterprises for their own gain.
He is a leader with a reasonable vision and plan if you read it with an open mind.
There will be one of 3 and only 3 outcomes to an Obama Presidency:
1. He is on the level, capable and will have enough help from Congress and The People to clean up part of the mess we call government.
2. He is on the level but weak and unsupported. If this happens, shame on us.
3. He is lying and saying what The People want to hear in order to do the same thing every President since Eisenhower has done. Line his own pockets and reward his friends.
Give me a mistake prone leader over the next well groomed, well paid patsy of the DNC and RNC any election. It is the unscripted nature of this election that excites me. That was supposed to be a controllable Hillary getting the nod last Thursday; if you were going by the script written by the money behind the power in this country.
For Bush's terms Republicans, Reagan's presidency was controlled by Democrats. Let me ask you this though, why is it, that the defecit is larger than ever before in US history? With whom in charge?
Meh, i fault both parties for spending like drunken sailors and that might be an insult to drunken sailor(any Navy vets on the forum, not meant as an insult)
Ya know, what I dont get is how you guys can think that by making THE MONSTER BIGGER we can get back control of it. Please splain that to me.
