Once Again, Evidence Bush lied please.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by RetiredGySgt, Jan 26, 2012.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,574
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,989
    You Liberals keep repeating the lie that Bush somehow lied us into a war.

    You have had 10 years to get some evidence. Please be so kind as to provide it.

    What I have is the fact that EVERY Major Country in the World in 2002 BELIEVED Iraq had WMD's, including the leaders of the Democratic party and the previous Democratic party President and his Executive Branch. I have 3 Congressional Investigations, all of which STATE Bush did not lie to get us into a war.

    I have statements from the UN before the war that support the believe that Saddam Hussein was hiding WMD's. I have captured documents from Iraq that show Saddam was in bed with terrorists and shopping around for someone to attack the US, that he maintained his scientific team for when sanctions were lifted so he could return to a quest for the Bomb and he maintained a stockpile of materials to immediately return to mass production of Chemical and Biological weapons when sanctions were lifted.

    You liberals have what?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Mustang
    Offline

    Mustang Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    7,218
    Thanks Received:
    1,300
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    39° 44 mins 21 secs N, 104° 59 mins 5 secs W
    Ratings:
    +1,792
    You want an example of a bold-faced Bush lie?

    On April 20th, Bush said the following:
    Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution.
    What we didn't know at the time and wouldn't find out for another year and a half is that Bush authorized warrantless wiretaps in 2001.

    Now, Bush lied. He also broke the law, period. So, it isn't a stretch of the imagination to believe that Bush and members of his administration lied us into the war in Iraq, regardless of their motivations.
     
  3. NYcarbineer
    Online

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    96,203
    Thanks Received:
    11,272
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,290
    Colin Powell's presentation to the UN was full of lies.

    I suppose you could claim that Bush didn't sign off on that, although that would make him look worse than a liar.
     
  4. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    Bush lied and lied then lied some more ...get over it already..we have new liars to concern ourselves with trying to lie their way into new wars of conquest
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Truthseeker420
    Offline

    Truthseeker420 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    10,365
    Thanks Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Home of the 2013 BCS National Champion
    Ratings:
    +1,026
    Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - CIA - Salon.com
     
  6. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,574
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,989
    He did not lie. Warrantless wire taps have been legal for quite a while before Bush became President, before the Patriot Act was ever even contemplated. Further Any wire tap that was taken with out a warrant was not and still is not admissible in a Court of Law. Any LEGAL action to be taken would r5equire a warrant.

    But to the point. Even if it were a lie, it has nothing to do with Iraq. It has nothing to do with the lies told by you and others as if they were facts. Provide evidence or quit telling the lie.
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,574
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,989
    Provide evidence it was full of lies. Explain why 3 DIFFERENT Congressional Investigations all came to the same conclusion, NO LIES were told. I am waiting.
     
  8. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,574
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,989
    I see, just because you say so it is true, MORON.
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,574
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,989
    And yet this same info was available to all 3 Congressional Investigations and was found not warranting of saying Bush lied.

    Lets break it down shall we? You have an unsubstantiated claim with no back up. No evidence it actually happened. Except a single claim. Further even if it were true it was not Bush that failed to disclose this supposed intel but Tenant. Further lets assume for a moment it happened. One source out of hundreds is hardly earth shattering or conclusive. Tenant not Bush wrote the CIA portion of the intel brief. Anything NOT in it would be Tenant's fault not Bush's. Dismissing a single source out of hundreds is hardly a proof of a lie. But then you know that don't you?
     
  10. Valox
    Offline

    Valox Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,023
    Thanks Received:
    122
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +123
    On Sept. 18, 2002, CIA director George Tenet briefed President Bush in the Oval Office on top-secret intelligence that Saddam Hussein did not have weapons of mass destruction, according to two former senior CIA officers. Bush dismissed as worthless this information from the Iraqi foreign minister, a member of Saddam’s inner circle, although it turned out to be accurate in every detail. Tenet never brought it up again.
    Bush knew Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction - CIA - Salon.com

    Then again, neocons wanted war and 9/11 was the perfect excuse to go on a nation building exercise to put the Defense Policy Guidance into practice.

    No matter what, Bush apologetics will defend his actions and the war on Iraq - a nation that posed no threat to us.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page