First: Please re-read Flags post! It said the SSA said they never issued that number to Obama...they didn't say it had NEVER been issued!
In her FOIA complaint Taitz asserts that the SSN was issued to someone other than Obama, not that the SSN was never issued.
Really? Taitz v Astrue
1. AGENCY PROFFERED A FRAUDULENT STATEMENT, CLAIMING THAT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 042-68-4425 BELONGS TO A LIVE PERSON, WHILE IT’S OWN RECORDS SHOW, THAT THIS NUMBER WAS NEVER ASSIGNED.
The main point of dispute between the Plaintiff, Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ and the defendant commissioner of the Social Security administration, Michael Astrue, and the Department of Justice, representing him , is refusal by the defendant to release a redacted application for the above social security number, claiming, that it is used by a live person. In the motion for summary judgment Defendant is claiming that the social security number in question belongs to a live person and the interest of privacy of this person supersedes the right of the public to know.
In her complaint and multiple subsequent motions Plaintiff provided Exhibit #2, a letter from the Social Security Verifications systems, stating that this number was never assigned. So, how can it belong to a live person, if it was never assigned?
I just find it funny that you're saying your own source is saying something completely different than she's saying.
Last edited: