Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gee RW, all of those "lies" and the democrats still voted for the war.
Seems you knew more thasn our congress knew.
Give it a rest RW.
No one lied. They offfered opinon based on intel.
In an advanced draft of Obama's speech tonight on the withdrawl of U.S. troops from Iraq Obama is planning on making the following remarks:
Today we are removing all combat troops from Iraq. This was a war I opposed initially, as I opposed the surge that brought us to this point. But the true measure of a leader is admission that he is not infallible. I was wrong to oppose the surge, which has brought us peace with honor, removed a dangerous tyrant from the world stage, and liberated millions of Iraqis. All of this could not have been done without our brave troops on the ground, our military commanders overseeing it, and the wise policy decisions of my predecessor, President Bush."
OK, what do you think the chances of Obama actually saying that are?
Gee RW, all of those "lies" and the democrats still voted for the war.
Seems you knew more thasn our congress knew.
Give it a rest RW.
No one lied. They offfered opinon based on intel.
The majority of the Democrats voted against the war. You are just repeating another Republican Lie
Hillary Clinton voting for the War in Iraq cost her the Presidency
Well, you said "the Democrats still voted for the war" which, at first glance, you'd assume you meant that as a party they supported it............when only 42% voted in favor, 58% against.
Anyways, this is a cheese thread.
Well, you said "the Democrats still voted for the war" which, at first glance, you'd assume you meant that as a party they supported it............when only 42% voted in favor, 58% against.
Anyways, this is a cheese thread.
Poorly written by me.
I was actually referring oiginally to the senate......which I see and have always seen as the more important house of the two.
I actually see it as more pertinant to my family's well being than the WH.
Well, you said "the Democrats still voted for the war" which, at first glance, you'd assume you meant that as a party they supported it............when only 42% voted in favor, 58% against.
Anyways, this is a cheese thread.
Poorly written by me.
I was actually referring oiginally to the senate......which I see and have always seen as the more important house of the two.
I actually see it as more pertinant to my family's well being than the WH.
I prefer the Haskills myself, although the Beavers were cool. lol. (edit: whoa, Cleavers)
Have a good afternoon man!~
Well, you said "the Democrats still voted for the war" which, at first glance, you'd assume you meant that as a party they supported it............when only 42% voted in favor, 58% against.
Anyways, this is a cheese thread.
Well, you said "the Democrats still voted for the war" which, at first glance, you'd assume you meant that as a party they supported it............when only 42% voted in favor, 58% against.
Anyways, this is a cheese thread.
Democrats overwhelmingly voted for the war. You and Nutwinger can carp and crap all you want the war got far more bipartisan Congressional support than Obamacare did.
He isn't going to say what I wrote. He is going to talk about he is fulfilling his campaign pledge by ending hostilities. That is what makes him an unfit leader and a fraud.
Well, you said "the Democrats still voted for the war" which, at first glance, you'd assume you meant that as a party they supported it............when only 42% voted in favor, 58% against.
Anyways, this is a cheese thread.
Democrats overwhelmingly voted for the war. You and Nutwinger can carp and crap all you want the war got far more bipartisan Congressional support than Obamacare did.
He isn't going to say what I wrote. He is going to talk about he is fulfilling his campaign pledge by ending hostilities. That is what makes him an unfit leader and a fraud.
LOL
Math was never Rabbis best subject........neither was telling the truth
Me? I like to apply basic logic to my judgement calling. I do not allow partisan crap and ideological talking points to dictate my decision making and judgement calling.
But that is me.
Democrats overwhelmingly voted for the war. You and Nutwinger can carp and crap all you want the war got far more bipartisan Congressional support than Obamacare did.
He isn't going to say what I wrote. He is going to talk about he is fulfilling his campaign pledge by ending hostilities. That is what makes him an unfit leader and a fraud.
LOL
Math was never Rabbis best subject........neither was telling the truth
the vote was infinately more bipartisan than healthcare and stimulus.....
In the Senate, 33% more democratrs voted for the war than voted against it
Look. Whatever floats your boat. You want to believe that the President lied and not one Senator or Congressman WHO NOW LIVES WITH BLOOD ON HIS/HER HANDS DUE TO SUCH A LIE refuses to provide proof that would warrant a hearing? Go for it.
Me? I like to apply basic logic to my judgement calling. I do not allow partisan crap and ideological talking points to dictate my decision making and judgement calling.
But that is me.
LOL
Math was never Rabbis best subject........neither was telling the truth
the vote was infinately more bipartisan than healthcare and stimulus.....
In the Senate, 33% more democratrs voted for the war than voted against it
Look. Whatever floats your boat. You want to believe that the President lied and not one Senator or Congressman WHO NOW LIVES WITH BLOOD ON HIS/HER HANDS DUE TO SUCH A LIE refuses to provide proof that would warrant a hearing? Go for it.
Me? I like to apply basic logic to my judgement calling. I do not allow partisan crap and ideological talking points to dictate my decision making and judgement calling.
But that is me.
It doesn't represent bipartisanship on the war vote. It represents a lack of balls on Democratic Congressmen.
The Republicans wrapped the war vote in patriotism and being tough on terrorism and made it clear that they would challenge the Patriotism of any Democrat who voted against the war.
The Democrats showed their typical lack of backbone and caved in. The numbers still show that more Democrats voted against war than voted for it
In an advanced draft of Obama's speech tonight on the withdrawl of U.S. troops from Iraq Obama is planning on making the following remarks:
Today we are removing all combat troops from Iraq. This was a war I opposed initially, as I opposed the surge that brought us to this point. But the true measure of a leader is admission that he is not infallible. I was wrong to oppose the surge, which has brought us peace with honor, removed a dangerous tyrant from the world stage, and liberated millions of Iraqis. All of this could not have been done without our brave troops on the ground, our military commanders overseeing it, and the wise policy decisions of my predecessor, President Bush."
OK, what do you think the chances of Obama actually saying that are?
the vote was infinately more bipartisan than healthcare and stimulus.....
In the Senate, 33% more democratrs voted for the war than voted against it
Look. Whatever floats your boat. You want to believe that the President lied and not one Senator or Congressman WHO NOW LIVES WITH BLOOD ON HIS/HER HANDS DUE TO SUCH A LIE refuses to provide proof that would warrant a hearing? Go for it.
Me? I like to apply basic logic to my judgement calling. I do not allow partisan crap and ideological talking points to dictate my decision making and judgement calling.
But that is me.
It doesn't represent bipartisanship on the war vote. It represents a lack of balls on Democratic Congressmen.
The Republicans wrapped the war vote in patriotism and being tough on terrorism and made it clear that they would challenge the Patriotism of any Democrat who voted against the war.
The Democrats showed their typical lack of backbone and caved in. The numbers still show that more Democrats voted against war than voted for it
So you're saying that Democrats lack backbone and won't stand up for what they believe? Yes! I agree! Why do we want these people back in power????
the vote was infinately more bipartisan than healthcare and stimulus.....
In the Senate, 33% more democratrs voted for the war than voted against it
Look. Whatever floats your boat. You want to believe that the President lied and not one Senator or Congressman WHO NOW LIVES WITH BLOOD ON HIS/HER HANDS DUE TO SUCH A LIE refuses to provide proof that would warrant a hearing? Go for it.
Me? I like to apply basic logic to my judgement calling. I do not allow partisan crap and ideological talking points to dictate my decision making and judgement calling.
But that is me.
It doesn't represent bipartisanship on the war vote. It represents a lack of balls on Democratic Congressmen.
The Republicans wrapped the war vote in patriotism and being tough on terrorism and made it clear that they would challenge the Patriotism of any Democrat who voted against the war.
The Democrats showed their typical lack of backbone and caved in. The numbers still show that more Democrats voted against war than voted for it
So you're saying that Democrats lack backbone and won't stand up for what they believe? Yes! I agree! Why do we want these people back in power????
It doesn't represent bipartisanship on the war vote. It represents a lack of balls on Democratic Congressmen.
The Republicans wrapped the war vote in patriotism and being tough on terrorism and made it clear that they would challenge the Patriotism of any Democrat who voted against the war.
The Democrats showed their typical lack of backbone and caved in. The numbers still show that more Democrats voted against war than voted for it
So you're saying that Democrats lack backbone and won't stand up for what they believe? Yes! I agree! Why do we want these people back in power????
We want Democrats in power because more of them knew the Iraq war was idiocy than did Republicans. Republican support for the idiocy of invading Iraq was almost unanimous.
