Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
None of that has ever happened, despite best efforts of countless well-meaning leaders before The Obama.Say what you want, but cutting back on teh excessive arsenal of nuclear weaponry would reduce the number of missiles pointed around the world, and would also reduce military budgets by tens and maybe hundreds of billions each year, and free up a lot of personnel for other duties. Not this year, but when a drawdown commences. We have so many nukes, we could reduce by half and still outnumber the rest of the wordl.You can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. This is mindless peacenick pandering, there's no "ambition" anywhere in it... Unless he takes it to the level of "us first" then it's ambition, and annihilation.
Noble though the thought might be.
Trick is, do the reduction so that no terrorists or blackmarketeers get their hands on any fissionable or radioactive material.
THAT is the real danger.
Nuclear weapons are not covered under the 2nd Amendment. Reducing their numbers will not reduce anyone's security. They keep nobody safe.
We can accomplish more with one bullet to Kim Jong Il's head and each of his whacked out subordinates than we can with a trillon dollars in nukes.
Until that day, we will keep subs off the coast of Korea, in the Sea of Japan ready to launch Seals or missiles.
It's simply not realistic. It's a pipe dream. Because there exists evil in the world.
"Let there be peace on Earth and let it begin with me" is a beautiful hymn and a sweet sentiment. But it's totally impractical.
When nukes are outlawed only outlaws will have nukes.
he hopes will lend credibility to his message in atomic disputes with Iran and North Korea.
Keep dreaming Mr. Obama!
When nukes are outlawed only outlaws will have nukes.
Yeah right, and who will volunteer to go first?? Will it be China, or Russia, or Israel, or how about.....nobody in their right fucking mind is that naive to believe we'll all start shitting rainbows and kittens.
It's a pipe dream, a good one, but highly unrealistic and impossible to pull off.
you can say THAT AgainYeah right, and who will volunteer to go first?? Will it be China, or Russia, or Israel, or how about.....nobody in their right fucking mind is that naive to believe we'll all start shitting rainbows and kittens.
Are you kidding? WE will go first. We're the only ones with leadership dumb enough to do it.
Carter tried thatIt's a pipe dream, a good one, but highly unrealistic and impossible to pull off.
Thats the spirit Kitty!
All journeys start with a first step.
Yeah right, and who will volunteer to go first?? Will it be China, or Russia, or Israel, or how about.....nobody in their right fucking mind is that naive to believe we'll all start shitting rainbows and kittens.
Are you kidding? WE will go first. We're the only ones with leadership dumb enough to do it.
wood and PAPER
Why don't you post a picture of pearl harbor? Maybe the asshole Jap government should have thought twice before starting a war they couldn't finish, given that they had WOODEN cities.
You would prefer that we actually fought WWIII instead of just posturing for forty years? WWI killed nearly as many Europeans as WWII and there were no nukes and not much in the way of effective bombing Campaigns. Frankly, nukes as nasty as they were were the first of a long line of weapons systems that were supposed to make war too horrible to fight that actually did. Without nukes there would have been a lot more wars and a lot nastier wars.
Nukes killed what 260k people out of a total death toll in excess of 50 million for all combatants in WWII.
And leftist idiots find the 260k to horrible to contemplate. Your altogether too selective morality sir is entirely pathetic.
Please understand, I don't like War nor do I like nukes, but if Nukes are the only thing that keeps humanity from another total War like WWI, and WWII I'll take however many of them it requires to prevent that sort of obscenity.
