txlonghorn
Senior Member
- Mar 9, 2009
- 3,042
- 400
- 48
My "huffy temper" is your problem...not mine. If it bothers you that much, then go away and stop butting into my argument with someone else. I have demonstrated as much knowledge on this matter and all legal aspects of it as you or anyone else has. I'm not even going to address my acknowledgment of the exceptions clause AGAIN...and if they settle this matter out of court, then you can claim a victory over the small part of this discussion. But they won't. And when I'm proven right, I won't expect any apology...I know better.
So in other words you have absolutely no way to prove anything I said wrong, and are resorting to "YOU'LL SEE! AT SOME POINT! I'LL GET YOU NEXT TIME!". Useless. Support what you say for a change.
awesome. BP already agreed to pay the $20B. I don't see how you can say "IF they settled this matter out of court". Do you think BP will just back out and not pay now? The financial matter appears to be agreed upon and settled for the time being. Even if new evidence raised the number, I still doubt BP would go to court.
Where do you come up with this shit? How in the hell did you come up with the idea that I suggested they wouldn't pay now? I've already seen where several experts agree that BP will more than likely spend well over 40 billion...some say 50 - 60...and will likely be in court for years to come settling this matter. So don't kid yourself. I don't have to prove you're wrong. Seems the experts are standing on my side of the street. The only thing that has been agreed upon is that BP knows they are in deep and this is the first step out of the hole. BO even went as far as to suggest that BP foot the bill for lost revenue to workers due to HIS decision to impose a moratorium. ARE YOU KIDDING ME????? He wants BP to pay wages to the newly unemployed that HE created with this bullshit moratorium!!!