NYT editorial board horrified that Trump wants to fight radical Islamic terrorism

[MindWars]

NYT Editorial Board Horrified That Trump Wants To Fight ‘Radical Islamic Terrorism’

If New York Times doesn't stop pulling their liberal bs they too are going to go under sooner or later those who are awake are going to out number the entranced zombies who still go to snopes as their truth bibles, or fact check, or cnn, abc........................... Those vaccines have eaten quite a few holes in those brains.

 

[koshergrl]

Is anybody surprised?
I'm certainly not. I swing by the NYT to spread the word that they're fake news at least several times a day. And I'm not the only one.

They're washed up.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Do they not get that we no longer care what they say? Once they were caught making stuff up, they lost our confidence. Doesn't matter what they say now, it is all suspect.

 

[Coyote]

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

 

[Meathead]

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

Spot the contradiction.

Dingbat!

 

[koshergrl]

Do they not get that we no longer care what they say? Once they were caught making stuff up, they lost our confidence. Doesn't matter what they say now, it is all suspect.

Do you remember when all the lefties on here insisted there was no media bias?

Those were the days lolol. Jillie during her brief tenure as mod would sink any thread about media bias in the conspiracies forum.

Which is also where the mods used to put the "soros funding" threads.

 

[Meathead]

Do they not get that we no longer care what they say? Once they were caught making stuff up, they lost our confidence. Doesn't matter what they say now, it is all suspect.

Do you remember when all the lefties on here insisted there was no media bias?

Those were the days lolol. Jillie during her brief tenure as mod would sink any thread about media bias in the conspiracies forum.

Which is also where the mods used to put the "soros funding" threads.

Remember the Clinton landslide?

Good times, eh?

 

[MindWars]

 

[blastoff]

I'd bet the NYT's former subscribers aren't horrified at all.

 

[koshergrl]

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

They have a problem with it no matter what form it takes. Stop lying.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

Really do tell.
How should we fight it?

Let unveted refugees come in? That'll teach those terrorists!

 

[Coyote]

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

They have a problem with it no matter what form it takes. Stop lying.

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

Really do tell.
How should we fight it?

Let unveted refugees come in? That'll teach those terrorists!

We haven't been letting unvetted refugees in. That's another rightwing lie you keep perpetrating.

 

[buckeye45_73]

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

They have a problem with it no matter what form it takes. Stop lying.

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

Really do tell.
How should we fight it?

Let unveted refugees come in? That'll teach those terrorists!

We haven't been letting unvetted refugees in. That's another rightwing lie you keep perpetrating.

Really whos vetting the syrian refugees? Iraqi?
Somalian?
Yemen?
Libyan?
Iranian?
Sudanese?

How many of those govt do you trust?
And is our scrrening better than frnech or german screening?

 

[Coyote]

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

They have a problem with it no matter what form it takes. Stop lying.

The OP is a lie.

The NYT has no issue with fighting radical Islamic terrorism. They're arguing about the way Trump is going about it.

Really do tell.
How should we fight it?

Let unveted refugees come in? That'll teach those terrorists!

We haven't been letting unvetted refugees in. That's another rightwing lie you keep perpetrating.

Really whos vetting the syrian refugees? Iraqi?
Somalian?
Yemen?
Libyan?
Iranian?
Sudanese?

How many of those govt do you trust?
And is our scrrening better than frnech or german screening?

We are.

Yes, ours is better - it takes longer, on average 4 years. The Germans and French aren't dealing with just refugees but with assylum seekers and migrants who are essentially unvetted. It's a very different program then what we have for refugees.