North Korea Attacks!

[Dajjal]

Found this on facebook

 

[ScienceRocks]

Kim jong un won't do anything besides fire off his little rocket into the pacific.

Shit. This moron was even too chicken shit to do that. wow.

North Korea doesn't have the balls.

 

[Indofred]

Kim jong un won't do anything besides fire off his little rocket into the pacific.

Shit. This moron was even too chicken shit to do that. wow.

North Korea doesn't have the balls.

Maybe not but it does have the stupidity.

If you leave a dog alone, it'll growl a bit and go away.
If you poke it with a stick, it'll probably bite you.

America is poking North Korea with a stick and it may just get bitten.
OK, you lot'll hammer the place but at what cost in American life and what will you gain?
Thousands dead for bog all.

 

[georgephillip]

Kim jong un won't do anything besides fire off his little rocket into the pacific.

Shit. This moron was even too chicken shit to do that. wow.

North Korea doesn't have the balls.

Maybe not but it does have the stupidity.

If you leave a dog alone, it'll growl a bit and go away.
If you poke it with a stick, it'll probably bite you.

America is poking North Korea with a stick and it may just get bitten.
OK, you lot'll hammer the place but at what cost in American life and what will you gain?
Thousands dead for bog all.

All North Koreans are not stupid or cowardly but they do remember how the US totally destroyed every city between the Yalu River and the 38 parallel in the early 1950s. The US dropped 635,000 tons of bombs during that war, most of it on the north. We dropped 650,000 tons of bombs on Germany in WWII. No doubt the US and South Korea would prevail in an all out war, but I suspect the death toll would be in the tens of millions. Who gets rich from that?

 

[Indofred]

Shit. This moron was even too chicken shit to do that. wow.

North Korea doesn't have the balls.

Maybe not but it does have the stupidity.

If you leave a dog alone, it'll growl a bit and go away.
If you poke it with a stick, it'll probably bite you.

America is poking North Korea with a stick and it may just get bitten.
OK, you lot'll hammer the place but at what cost in American life and what will you gain?
Thousands dead for bog all.

All North Koreans are not stupid or cowardly but they do remember how the US totally destroyed every city between the Yalu River and the 38 parallel in the early 1950s. The US dropped 635,000 tons of bombs during that war, most of it on the north. We dropped 650,000 tons of bombs on Germany in WWII. No doubt the US and South Korea would prevail in an all out war, but I suspect the death toll would be in the tens of millions. Who gets rich from that?

American arms manufacturers.

 

[georgephillip]

Maybe not but it does have the stupidity.

If you leave a dog alone, it'll growl a bit and go away.
If you poke it with a stick, it'll probably bite you.

America is poking North Korea with a stick and it may just get bitten.
OK, you lot'll hammer the place but at what cost in American life and what will you gain?
Thousands dead for bog all.

All North Koreans are not stupid or cowardly but they do remember how the US totally destroyed every city between the Yalu River and the 38 parallel in the early 1950s. The US dropped 635,000 tons of bombs during that war, most of it on the north. We dropped 650,000 tons of bombs on Germany in WWII. No doubt the US and South Korea would prevail in an all out war, but I suspect the death toll would be in the tens of millions. Who gets rich from that?

American arms manufacturers.

There was profit earned one every single bomb dropped on Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Panama, Grenada? Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, etc, etc, and it is not the case that all the money goes to Wall Street and the US investor class. There are many middle class jobs that depend on building weapons. The arms trade is the most profitable industry on the planet right now, and it doesn't seem likely that will change until there is more money in peace than in war.

 

[Katzndogz]

North Korea SHOULD attack. It's all obama needs. His middle east policy is reaming his ass, dometically he's a failure. North Korea would make it a trifecta.

 

[georgephillip]

North Korea SHOULD attack. It's all obama needs. His middle east policy is reaming his ass, dometically he's a failure. North Korea would make it a trifecta.

Obama and Bush and Clinton all serve the same 1% of Americans.
Why do you selectively criticize one and not the others?

 

[Unkotare]

Take it to the Conspiracy Forum, head case. >>>

 

[georgephillip]

Surely you have noticed which one percent of Americans has increased their share of wealth and income over the last two generations, regardless of which party holds power?

 

[Indofred]

All North Koreans are not stupid or cowardly but they do remember how the US totally destroyed every city between the Yalu River and the 38 parallel in the early 1950s. The US dropped 635,000 tons of bombs during that war, most of it on the north. We dropped 650,000 tons of bombs on Germany in WWII. No doubt the US and South Korea would prevail in an all out war, but I suspect the death toll would be in the tens of millions. Who gets rich from that?

American arms manufacturers.

There was profit earned one every single bomb dropped on Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Panama, Grenada? Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, etc, etc, and it is not the case that all the money goes to Wall Street and the US investor class. There are many middle class jobs that depend on building weapons. The arms trade is the most profitable industry on the planet right now, and it doesn't seem likely that will change until there is more money in peace than in war.

You got it.
At the moment, America is selling arms to Muslim countries all over the middle east and, to maintain the military advantage held by Israel, is giving away (for free) a few billion Dollars worth of weapons to them.
The potential war in NK is just one more excuse to increase arms sales in that region as the turning of China from a trading partner to an enemy is doing.

Before WWII, the American arms industry was doing nothing but there has always been a reason to build up weapons since then, even when there wasn't a reason.
Vietnam was never any threat to America as wasn't North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Cambodia or any other country America has attacked.
What, you don't think America has attacked Iran yet? Tut tut, you don't read the news, do you?

 

[ScienceRocks]

North Korea SHOULD attack. It's all obama needs. His middle east policy is reaming his ass, dometically he's a failure. North Korea would make it a trifecta.

Fuck the way things are going, why shouldn't china attack? They could beat us and take our resources.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Surely you have noticed which one percent of Americans has increased their share of wealth and income over the last two generations, regardless of which party holds power?

Sadly, they're the ones that understand how to build wealth. How do we make the poor build wealth? More of a question of knowledge then transfer of money.

 

[georgephillip]

Surely you have noticed which one percent of Americans has increased their share of wealth and income over the last two generations, regardless of which party holds power?

Sadly, they're the ones that understand how to build wealth. How do we make the poor build wealth? More of a question of knowledge then transfer of money.

Lately they seem better at extracting wealth than in producing or building wealth.
Once upon a time US investors needed a solid middle class of productive workers to produce the goods and services. The middle class drove 70% of US GDP with their purchases. Today, US investors have a much larger middle class rising in places like Brazil. India, and China. This tends to increase the wealth of ten percent or less of Americans and decrease the net worth of the remaining 90%.

 

[Katzndogz]

North Korea SHOULD attack. It's all obama needs. His middle east policy is reaming his ass, dometically he's a failure. North Korea would make it a trifecta.

Fuck the way things are going, why shouldn't china attack? They could beat us and take our resources.

They would only get the resources they already own.

 

[Unkotare]

North Korea SHOULD attack. It's all obama needs. His middle east policy is reaming his ass, dometically he's a failure. North Korea would make it a trifecta.

Fuck the way things are going, why shouldn't china attack? They could beat us and take our resources.

No, they couldn't, you idiot.

 

[aleks.iv]

American arms manufacturers.

There was profit earned one every single bomb dropped on Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Panama, Grenada? Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, etc, etc, and it is not the case that all the money goes to Wall Street and the US investor class. There are many middle class jobs that depend on building weapons. The arms trade is the most profitable industry on the planet right now, and it doesn't seem likely that will change until there is more money in peace than in war.

You got it.
At the moment, America is selling arms to Muslim countries all over the middle east and, to maintain the military advantage held by Israel, is giving away (for free) a few billion Dollars worth of weapons to them.
The potential war in NK is just one more excuse to increase arms sales in that region as the turning of China from a trading partner to an enemy is doing.

Before WWII, the American arms industry was doing nothing but there has always been a reason to build up weapons since then, even when there wasn't a reason.
Vietnam was never any threat to America as wasn't North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Cambodia or any other country America has attacked.
What, you don't think America has attacked Iran yet? Tut tut, you don't read the news, do you?

I agree with you Next war will be in Syria, and as always, it is very beneficial to our government and our Pentagon, our press we hang noodles on the ears, saying that there is already used chemical weapons as the war with Iraq, but the death of soldiers and civilians, and of course our manufacturers obogoscheniya weapons and moneybags death for them to earn money

 

[Indofred]

There was profit earned one every single bomb dropped on Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Panama, Grenada? Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, etc, etc, and it is not the case that all the money goes to Wall Street and the US investor class. There are many middle class jobs that depend on building weapons. The arms trade is the most profitable industry on the planet right now, and it doesn't seem likely that will change until there is more money in peace than in war.

You got it.
At the moment, America is selling arms to Muslim countries all over the middle east and, to maintain the military advantage held by Israel, is giving away (for free) a few billion Dollars worth of weapons to them.
The potential war in NK is just one more excuse to increase arms sales in that region as the turning of China from a trading partner to an enemy is doing.

Before WWII, the American arms industry was doing nothing but there has always been a reason to build up weapons since then, even when there wasn't a reason.
Vietnam was never any threat to America as wasn't North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Cambodia or any other country America has attacked.
What, you don't think America has attacked Iran yet? Tut tut, you don't read the news, do you?

I agree with you Next war will be in Syria, and as always, it is very beneficial to our government and our Pentagon, our press we hang noodles on the ears, saying that there is already used chemical weapons as the war with Iraq, but the death of soldiers and civilians, and of course our manufacturers obogoscheniya weapons and moneybags death for them to earn money

It may well be.
America is shoving the 'fact' of Syrian chemical weapons but absolutely no mention of the UN report, saying there is hardly any evidence of this.
Evidence of Syria chemical weapons use not up to U.N. standard | Reuters

 

[aleks.iv]

You got it.
At the moment, America is selling arms to Muslim countries all over the middle east and, to maintain the military advantage held by Israel, is giving away (for free) a few billion Dollars worth of weapons to them.
The potential war in NK is just one more excuse to increase arms sales in that region as the turning of China from a trading partner to an enemy is doing.

Before WWII, the American arms industry was doing nothing but there has always been a reason to build up weapons since then, even when there wasn't a reason.
Vietnam was never any threat to America as wasn't North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Cambodia or any other country America has attacked.
What, you don't think America has attacked Iran yet? Tut tut, you don't read the news, do you?

I agree with you Next war will be in Syria, and as always, it is very beneficial to our government and our Pentagon, our press we hang noodles on the ears, saying that there is already used chemical weapons as the war with Iraq, but the death of soldiers and civilians, and of course our manufacturers obogoscheniya weapons and moneybags death for them to earn money

It may well be.
America is shoving the 'fact' of Syrian chemical weapons but absolutely no mention of the UN report, saying there is hardly any evidence of this.
Evidence of Syria chemical weapons use not up to U.N. standard | Reuters

UN takes the position do not know and do not want the press is silent but the fact teroristov use of chemical weapons against Assad is present for this case is preparing an operation to capture Syria and Assad essentially fighting against militants and murderers .Syria News: Terrorists Suffer Heavy Losses during Army Operations Syria News: Summary for 27 Apr 2013 SANA …

 

[aleks.iv]

Here's more about Syria if interestedhttp://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/04/27/300485/syrian-army-kills-several-militants/There would be no war now in Korea yet.