- Banned
- #1,281
so... the persian shiites from Iran and not there to help the shiite mahdi army, but to help the foreign sunni arab AQ? is that right?
ever gonna defend this goofy scenario of yours, RSR?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
so... the persian shiites from Iran and not there to help the shiite mahdi army, but to help the foreign sunni arab AQ? is that right?
ever gonna defend this goofy scenario of yours, RSR?
The only goofy thing here is your rabid obsession with surrender and defeat in Iraq
no. I have no such obsession.
I wonder how you can untie yourself from the knots you have created with your goofy stories. Here is a synopsis of your idiocy:
Persian shiites from Iran supporting foreign sunni arabs (AQ) in their efforts to overpower Iraqi shiites.
Foreign sunnis terrorists (AQ) somehow being able to wrest control of the government of Iraq away from 22 million well armed indigenous shiites (and the mahdi army specifically) and 7 million indigenous sunnis (including the sunni insurgents now armed with American weapons who have been beating them in Anbar for weeks now) AND the 150K strong American trained Iraqi Army.
Iran sweeping in after the AQ victory to take the reins of government and relegate AQ to minor bureaucratic positions or killing them if they resist.
and you can never seem to be able to explain how or why such things would or could take place.
can't seem to back up your ridiculous notions, can you?
Why not just say so?
RSR's scenario:
Persian shiites from Iran are supporting foreign sunni arabs (AQ) in their efforts to overpower Iraqi shiites.
Foreign sunnis terrorists (AQ) somehow will be able to wrest control of the government of Iraq away from 22 million well armed indigenous shiites (and the mahdi army specifically) and 7 million indigenous sunnis (including the sunni insurgents now armed with American weapons who have been beating them in Anbar for weeks now) AND the 150K strong American trained Iraqi Army.
Iran will then sweep in after the AQ victory to take the reins of government and relegate AQ to minor bureaucratic positions or killing them if they resist.
no explanation ever offered to back that weird shit up!
He's as numb as the chimp in the white house!
that is not so...
and why are you incapable of explaining your hairbrained theories?
I find the theory of libs wanting defeat and surrender in Iraq to be a solid fact
I have never advocated defeat or surrender. You have, however, suggested that
Persian shiites from Iran are supporting foreign sunni arabs (AQ) in their efforts to overpower Iraqi shiites.
Foreign sunnis terrorists (AQ) somehow will be able to wrest control of the government of Iraq away from 22 million well armed indigenous shiites (and the mahdi army specifically) and 7 million indigenous sunnis (including the sunni insurgents now armed with American weapons who have been beating them in Anbar for weeks now) AND the 150K strong American trained Iraqi Army.
Iran will then sweep in after the AQ victory to take the reins of government and relegate AQ to minor bureaucratic positions or killing them if they resist.
will you ever explain that?
still just oneliner talking points and no explanation for your hairbrained scenarios.
Why IS that?
Libs said the same thing when people said the killing would be worse in Viet Nam after Dems surrendered there
I am saying that your hairbrained scenarios with Iran helping AQ kill Iraqi shiites and all the rest of that weirdness is crazy. and you have yet to explain it.
Shame how the Dem party has put political gains ahead of their country
I haven't. It is really a shame that you are unable to intelligently defend your assertions in any sort of debate. When do you think you'll be able to do that? Again...I think your predictions as to what will transpire in Iraq are completely ridiculous and without any intellectual merit. When asked to defend them, you run away from them. all the time.
why IS that?
No debate here
Dems are now the party of surrender and appeasement