NO NUKE DEAL: Did Cohen distract Trump?

[forkup]

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Everybody in the administration who is questioned about it under oath, disagrees. Obama did stop their nuclear development.

 

[forkup]

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Everybody in the administration who is questioned about it disagrees. Obama did stop their nuclear development.

 

[rightwinger]

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath (perjury). 9/11 happened because he was more interested in sticking cigars up the bottom of an intern than doing his job as president.

Lying about a blowjob is still about a blowjob. If Republicans want to stick to their guns and claim that meets the standard of impeachment....then fine

That is the standard we will apply to Trump

the charge was perjury. the subject of the lie doesn't matter, he lied under oath. He took advantage of a young employee in the oval office multiple times, he raped and groped women regularly. He had his buddy Webb Hubbell impregnate Hillary because he couldn't and they thought a kid would help them politically. The Clintons are slime.

I agree with you except for your conspiracy rant about Hubbell. That makes you look like an idiot

If Republicans want the standard for impeachment to be lying about a blow job then Dems can apply the same standard to paying bribes to porn stars right before an election

the difference is "under oath" and its not illegal to pay someone for their silence

Bill Clinton confirmed the Hubbell story, he said "yep, Webb sired her" His words, not mine. Why has Chelsea refused a DNA test that would settle it?

The more you babble, the more you look like a fucking moron

Want to tell me about how Hillary faked the moon landing?

 

[ABikerSailor]

I'm still wondering why people think Trump deserves a Nobel.

First meeting, all he got from Un was a piece of paper saying that N. Korea would think about denuclearization. Trump stopped scheduled exercises between S. Korea and the USA that N. Korea considered provoking.

Second meeting, Un didn't even give Trump a piece of paper, he walked out. And, yet again, Trump stopped the exercises, but this time, he decided to permanently cancel them, saying they were too expensive, but we know that he's Un's bitch.

For being such a great negotiator, he's done a pretty crappy job.

 

[rightwinger]

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Iran got nothing from the US

They gave up enriched uranium supplies they had been working on for years. They gave up their centerfuges used to enrich uranium. They submitted to international inspections

For that, they received their own money that had been taken as a sanction for a nuclear program that now did not exist

 

[basquebromance]

"I’ll be introducing a bipartisan resolution next week affirming that Congress holds Kim Jong Un responsible for the death of Otto Warmbier." - Rep Tom Malinowski

 

[Markle]

Lefties are like woo we still have nuclear Armageddon hanging over our heads, yay!

Ha you probably cheered when trump canceled the Iran deal...and the funny thing is that his deal is shaping up to be similar.

 

[Markle]

Iran got nothing from the US

They gave up enriched uranium supplies they had been working on for years. They gave up their centerfuges used to enrich uranium. They submitted to international inspections

For that, they received their own money that had been taken as a sanction for a nuclear program that now did not exist

What good reason is there to give a terrorist nation $150 BILLION? I don't care if it is their own money.

 

[Markle]

Lying about a blowjob is still about a blowjob. If Republicans want to stick to their guns and claim that meets the standard of impeachment....then fine

That is the standard we will apply to Trump

Yeah, wait until after President Donald Trump has been convicted of a felony.

William Jefferson Clinton, Former President of the United States and Democrat

Sexual Assault
Rape

Gennifer Flowers (Unknown settlement)

Paula Jones ($850,000 settlement)

Kathleen Willey (Unknown settlement)

Juanita Broaddrick (Unknown settlement)

Monica Lewinsky….(“I did not have sex with THAT woman”)

Perjury
Impeachment

Loss of Law License

$50,000 fine

Whitewater

Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker - fraud felony convictions - 3 counts (Tucker
resigned facing impeachment)

Jim McDougal - fraud and conspiracy felony convictions - 18 counts

Susan McDougal - felony - 4 counts (pardoned during Clinton's last minute
pardongate payoffs)

William J. Marks Sr - conspiracy

Stephen Smith - conspiracy

Larry Kuca - Fraud

Neal Ainley - 2 misdemeanors for embezzlement

David Hale - guilty plea - conspiracy

Chris Wade - felony

Whitewater real-estate investor John Haley - recent!

1998 on fraud Robert Palmer - felony for conspiracy Charles Matthews - guilty
plea for bribery Eugene Fitzhugh -

Whitewater - bribery Webster Hubbell - #2 ranking Justice Dept. Official -
felony for embezzlement and fraud

John Latham - CEO of Madison Bank - bank fraud Campaign

Finance: Johnny Chung - Clinton cronie - felony guilty plea - funneling money from China

Gene Lum - convicted - felony for money laundering for the DNC

Nora Lum - convicted - felony for money laundering for the DNC

Howard Glicken - guilty plea - 2 midemeanors - funneling foreign donations

Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie - guilty plea - illegal Clinton campaign donations

John Huang - Clinton cronie - felony guilty plea - funneling money from China

Paula Jonesgate: William Jefferson Clinton - found guilty - civil contempt of court - lying under oath about material facts. The Office of the Independent

Council further presented Clinton with an agreement that had him disbarred from practicing law for 5 years and made him sign a statement admitting to his deception

Post Administration

Sandy Bergergate Sandy Berger – Clinton National Security Adviser -- found guilty of stealing highly classified documents from the National Archive and destroying them.

 

[Pilot1]

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath (perjury). 9/11 happened because he was more interested in sticking cigars up the bottom of an intern than doing his job as president.

Lying about a blowjob is still about a blowjob. If Republicans want to stick to their guns and claim that meets the standard of impeachment....then fine

That is the standard we will apply to Trump

the charge was perjury. the subject of the lie doesn't matter, he lied under oath. He took advantage of a young employee in the oval office multiple times, he raped and groped women regularly. He had his buddy Webb Hubbell impregnate Hillary because he couldn't and they thought a kid would help them politically. The Clintons are slime.

I agree with you except for your conspiracy rant about Hubbell. That makes you look like an idiot

If Republicans want the standard for impeachment to be lying about a blow job then Dems can apply the same standard to paying bribes to porn stars right before an election

the difference is "under oath" and its not illegal to pay someone for their silence

Bill Clinton confirmed the Hubbell story, he said "yep, Webb sired her" His words, not mine. Why has Chelsea refused a DNA test that would settle it?

It is why you now rarely if ever see a picture of Bill with Chelsea

 

[Redfish]

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Nothing? You mean a moratorium on the development of nuclear weapons is nothing? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what Trump went to Hanoi for?

It would be something if the Iranians actually stopped development of nukes, but they haven't. Their centrifuges are still spinning creating material for nuke bombs, they are still testing, and they are still funding radical Islamic terrorism around the world.'

In the case of Trump and NK, there has been no missile firings or nuke tests since the first summit meeting, and Trump did not give them 150 billion like obozo gave to Iran.

Some presidents care about this country, some care more about their muslim brothers. You decide which is which.

 

[forkup]

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Nothing? You mean a moratorium on the development of nuclear weapons is nothing? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what Trump went to Hanoi for?

It would be something if the Iranians actually stopped development of nukes, but they haven't. Their centrifuges are still spinning creating material for nuke bombs, they are still testing, and they are still funding radical Islamic terrorism around the world.'

In the case of Trump and NK, there has been no missile firings or nuke tests since the first summit meeting, and Trump did not give them 150 billion like obozo gave to Iran.

Some presidents care about this country, some care more about their muslim brothers. You decide which is which.

Again, when questioned under oath by congress ZERO people in the administration agree.Zero people in the military agree. Zero people in the intelligence community agree with your statements. So who do you think I'll believe?

 

[forkup]

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Nothing? You mean a moratorium on the development of nuclear weapons is nothing? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what Trump went to Hanoi for?

It would be something if the Iranians actually stopped development of nukes, but they haven't. Their centrifuges are still spinning creating material for nuke bombs, they are still testing, and they are still funding radical Islamic terrorism around the world.'

In the case of Trump and NK, there has been no missile firings or nuke tests since the first summit meeting, and Trump did not give them 150 billion like obozo gave to Iran.

Some presidents care about this country, some care more about their muslim brothers. You decide which is which.

Iran has zero nuclear tests done, period. Since they don't have any. Guess why?

 

[Redfish]

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Nothing? You mean a moratorium on the development of nuclear weapons is nothing? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what Trump went to Hanoi for?

It would be something if the Iranians actually stopped development of nukes, but they haven't. Their centrifuges are still spinning creating material for nuke bombs, they are still testing, and they are still funding radical Islamic terrorism around the world.'

In the case of Trump and NK, there has been no missile firings or nuke tests since the first summit meeting, and Trump did not give them 150 billion like obozo gave to Iran.

Some presidents care about this country, some care more about their muslim brothers. You decide which is which.

Iran has zero nuclear tests done, period. Since they don't have any. Guess why?

right, and Saddam had no chemical weapons. you are a convenient idiot. your handlers on the left love morons like you who believe whatever crap they pump into your little head

 

[forkup]

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Nothing? You mean a moratorium on the development of nuclear weapons is nothing? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what Trump went to Hanoi for?

It would be something if the Iranians actually stopped development of nukes, but they haven't. Their centrifuges are still spinning creating material for nuke bombs, they are still testing, and they are still funding radical Islamic terrorism around the world.'

In the case of Trump and NK, there has been no missile firings or nuke tests since the first summit meeting, and Trump did not give them 150 billion like obozo gave to Iran.

Some presidents care about this country, some care more about their muslim brothers. You decide which is which.

Iran has zero nuclear tests done, period. Since they don't have any. Guess why?

right, and Saddam had no chemical weapons. you are a convenient idiot. your handlers on the left love morons like you who believe whatever crap they pump into your little head

You know what is idiotic? Someone sourcing things said by people appointed by Trump and claiming he's being handled by the left. Or claiming Iraq had chemical weapons when the US went to war over it, when the US military couldn't find any even though they have been in the country for ten plus years. I have sourced and explained every single one of my positions. You have not. You know how they call something you believe regardless of evidence to the contrary? Faith, and faith my friend isn't rational. I have no further need to talk to someone who doesn't feel that rationality or truth should be part of the conversation.

 

[grainbely]

Lefties are like woo we still have nuclear Armageddon hanging over our heads, yay!

Ha you probably cheered when trump canceled the Iran deal...and the funny thing is that his deal is shaping up to be similar.

I'm ambivalent about the Iran nuke deal. I don't like the idea of sending them buckets of cash but other than that, whatever.

Why do you say that? Are you intentionally trying to mislead on the money? They got back the money that had been seized in US and allies banks.

 

[toobfreak]

[QUOTE="Lakhota, post: 21908483, member: 31132"Did Cohen distract Trump? What do you think?[/QUOTE]

I think you're an idiot and this thread garbage. Trump's in there pitching doing what no other president tried to do, and Trump probably cut it short when he didn't get the FB from the fat midget that he wanted. It's a game of words and tactics. They will meet again.

 

[impuretrash]

Lefties are like woo we still have nuclear Armageddon hanging over our heads, yay!

Ha you probably cheered when trump canceled the Iran deal...and the funny thing is that his deal is shaping up to be similar.

I'm ambivalent about the Iran nuke deal. I don't like the idea of sending them buckets of cash but other than that, whatever.

Why do you say that? Are you intentionally trying to mislead on the money? They got back the money that had been seized in US and allies banks.

I know all that but the optics of sending pallets of cash in secret to a nation that is notorious for wishing death to America is not good.

 

[Aletheia4u]

NO NUKE DEAL​

A working lunch and joint signing ceremony were unexpectedly canceled on Thursday afternoon.

President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un failed to reach a nuclear agreement during their second summit, which was abruptly cut short in Hanoi, Vietnam on Thursday afternoon.

Trump, Kim Fail To Reach Agreement In Hanoi After Talks Abruptly Cut Short

Did Cohen distract Trump? What do you think?

Everytime Pres.Trump goes visiting other world leaders that aren't friends with the Globalist, that they always has a surprised hearings. It sounds as if they are afraid of what he might find out about them, or and if he comes back with disturbing info about them on the corruptions they has been doing for the past century? Then the Globalist will say, "Look, Pres.Trump is just slinging mud back at us for exposing him." And that the Libtards will not believe what he has discovered about them. And the Globalist will still have control over the Libtard movement.

 

[Markle]

Why do you say that? Are you intentionally trying to mislead on the money? They got back the money that had been seized in US and allies banks.

I don't care where the money came from.

How is giving $150 BILLION to a known terrorist nation, a nation who pays the family of suicide bombers, a nation developing nuclear weapons to use on Israel a grand idea?