NO NUKE DEAL: Did Cohen distract Trump?

[Redfish]

Clinton is a liberal loser. He was better off in England. Can you imagine him in combat?

Our country missed a great opportunity when Donald J Trump was sidelined by crippling bone spurs

Can you imagine what his leadership and big brain could have brought to the war in Vietnam? It would have been over by 1965 and there would be a Trump Tower and golf course in Hanoi

He would have built a wall on the border of Vietnam and China and Mexico would have paid for it

we do agree on Clinton. What is also true is that most young American males in those days did not want to go to viet nam and die for nothing. the ones that did deserve our praise and admiration, those who died (58,000 of them), were never given the heroic status that they deserved for trying to win Kennedy and Johnson's fiasco war, and they would have won it if only the political assholes had let them.

Doesn’t address the impact of having a soldier like Trump fighting for the Red, White and Blue

Trump had years of

No what you said was that Obama was reluctant about killing Bin Laden. Something you are now admitting was because of the risks involved in the mission and a reluctance shared by everybody. Not being adverse to the act itself which your original statement without context implied.

Obama was concerned about pissing off his muslim brothers in Pakistan. It was quite obvious at the time. and I don't give a shit if you agree. The truth about Obama and his muslim connections was, and is, obvious to anyone who has even a modicum of intelligence.

You are a fucking moron

It was Bush who broke off the pursuit of Bin Laden at Tora Bora and refused to follow him into Pakistan

It was the Great Obama who attacked inside Pakistan to kill bin Laden

Actually it was Clinton who could have taken him before 9/11 when Sudan told him where he was. 9/11 happened because Clinton did not have the balls to act, and yes, obozo did the right thing in authorizing the hit on Bin Laden, but its also true that he was very scared of what the Paki's might do after we "engaged in an act or war" inside Pakistan (his words, not mine)

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

A colossal waste of time and money all the way around.

political revenge is always a waste of time and money. Mueller's investigation is the latest example.

 

[rightwinger]

Clinton is a liberal loser. He was better off in England. Can you imagine him in combat?

Our country missed a great opportunity when Donald J Trump was sidelined by crippling bone spurs

Can you imagine what his leadership and big brain could have brought to the war in Vietnam? It would have been over by 1965 and there would be a Trump Tower and golf course in Hanoi

He would have built a wall on the border of Vietnam and China and Mexico would have paid for it

we do agree on Clinton. What is also true is that most young American males in those days did not want to go to viet nam and die for nothing. the ones that did deserve our praise and admiration, those who died (58,000 of them), were never given the heroic status that they deserved for trying to win Kennedy and Johnson's fiasco war, and they would have won it if only the political assholes had let them.

Doesn’t address the impact of having a soldier like Trump fighting for the Red, White and Blue

Trump had years of

No what you said was that Obama was reluctant about killing Bin Laden. Something you are now admitting was because of the risks involved in the mission and a reluctance shared by everybody. Not being adverse to the act itself which your original statement without context implied.

Obama was concerned about pissing off his muslim brothers in Pakistan. It was quite obvious at the time. and I don't give a shit if you agree. The truth about Obama and his muslim connections was, and is, obvious to anyone who has even a modicum of intelligence.

You are a fucking moron

It was Bush who broke off the pursuit of Bin Laden at Tora Bora and refused to follow him into Pakistan

It was the Great Obama who attacked inside Pakistan to kill bin Laden

Actually it was Clinton who could have taken him before 9/11 when Sudan told him where he was. 9/11 happened because Clinton did not have the balls to act, and yes, obozo did the right thing in authorizing the hit on Bin Laden, but its also true that he was very scared of what the Paki's might do after we "engaged in an act or war" inside Pakistan (his words, not mine)

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath (perjury). 9/11 happened because he was more interested in sticking cigars up the bottom of an intern than doing his job as president.

Lying about a blowjob is still about a blowjob. If Republicans want to stick to their guns and claim that meets the standard of impeachment....then fine

That is the standard we will apply to Trump

 

[rightwinger]

we do agree on Clinton. What is also true is that most young American males in those days did not want to go to viet nam and die for nothing. the ones that did deserve our praise and admiration, those who died (58,000 of them), were never given the heroic status that they deserved for trying to win Kennedy and Johnson's fiasco war, and they would have won it if only the political assholes had let them.

Doesn’t address the impact of having a soldier like Trump fighting for the Red, White and Blue

Trump had years of

Obama was concerned about pissing off his muslim brothers in Pakistan. It was quite obvious at the time. and I don't give a shit if you agree. The truth about Obama and his muslim connections was, and is, obvious to anyone who has even a modicum of intelligence.

You are a fucking moron

It was Bush who broke off the pursuit of Bin Laden at Tora Bora and refused to follow him into Pakistan

It was the Great Obama who attacked inside Pakistan to kill bin Laden

Actually it was Clinton who could have taken him before 9/11 when Sudan told him where he was. 9/11 happened because Clinton did not have the balls to act, and yes, obozo did the right thing in authorizing the hit on Bin Laden, but its also true that he was very scared of what the Paki's might do after we "engaged in an act or war" inside Pakistan (his words, not mine)

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

A colossal waste of time and money all the way around.

political revenge is always a waste of time and money. Mueller's investigation is the latest example.

What is Mueller trying to get revenge over

 

[rightwinger]

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

Just to set the record straight.

North Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

Kim’s position was no surprise, the official said, because it had been brought up repeatedly in lower-level talks. But Trump and his negotiators decided lifting the sanctions posed from 2016 onward was too much.

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui said Trump’s reaction puzzled Kim. He said that Kim “may have lost his will [to continue] North Korea-U.S. dealings,” AP reported.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

So, Trump lied - again. What a surprise. Is Kim more honorable than Trump?

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

 

[Redfish]

we do agree on Clinton. What is also true is that most young American males in those days did not want to go to viet nam and die for nothing. the ones that did deserve our praise and admiration, those who died (58,000 of them), were never given the heroic status that they deserved for trying to win Kennedy and Johnson's fiasco war, and they would have won it if only the political assholes had let them.

Doesn’t address the impact of having a soldier like Trump fighting for the Red, White and Blue

Trump had years of

Obama was concerned about pissing off his muslim brothers in Pakistan. It was quite obvious at the time. and I don't give a shit if you agree. The truth about Obama and his muslim connections was, and is, obvious to anyone who has even a modicum of intelligence.

You are a fucking moron

It was Bush who broke off the pursuit of Bin Laden at Tora Bora and refused to follow him into Pakistan

It was the Great Obama who attacked inside Pakistan to kill bin Laden

Actually it was Clinton who could have taken him before 9/11 when Sudan told him where he was. 9/11 happened because Clinton did not have the balls to act, and yes, obozo did the right thing in authorizing the hit on Bin Laden, but its also true that he was very scared of what the Paki's might do after we "engaged in an act or war" inside Pakistan (his words, not mine)

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath (perjury). 9/11 happened because he was more interested in sticking cigars up the bottom of an intern than doing his job as president.

Lying about a blowjob is still about a blowjob. If Republicans want to stick to their guns and claim that meets the standard of impeachment....then fine

That is the standard we will apply to Trump

the charge was perjury. the subject of the lie doesn't matter, he lied under oath. He took advantage of a young employee in the oval office multiple times, he raped and groped women regularly. He had his buddy Webb Hubbell impregnate Hillary because he couldn't and they thought a kid would help them politically. The Clintons are slime.

 

[Redfish]

Doesn’t address the impact of having a soldier like Trump fighting for the Red, White and Blue

Trump had years of
You are a fucking moron

It was Bush who broke off the pursuit of Bin Laden at Tora Bora and refused to follow him into Pakistan

It was the Great Obama who attacked inside Pakistan to kill bin Laden

Actually it was Clinton who could have taken him before 9/11 when Sudan told him where he was. 9/11 happened because Clinton did not have the balls to act, and yes, obozo did the right thing in authorizing the hit on Bin Laden, but its also true that he was very scared of what the Paki's might do after we "engaged in an act or war" inside Pakistan (his words, not mine)

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

A colossal waste of time and money all the way around.

political revenge is always a waste of time and money. Mueller's investigation is the latest example.

What is Mueller trying to get revenge over

Trump winning when they all thought they had it rigged for Hillary.

 

[Redfish]

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

Just to set the record straight.

North Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

Kim’s position was no surprise, the official said, because it had been brought up repeatedly in lower-level talks. But Trump and his negotiators decided lifting the sanctions posed from 2016 onward was too much.

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui said Trump’s reaction puzzled Kim. He said that Kim “may have lost his will [to continue] North Korea-U.S. dealings,” AP reported.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

So, Trump lied - again. What a surprise. Is Kim more honorable than Trump?

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

I don't think most of the world believes the little murdering dictator over president Trump. If you do, that just confirms your stupidity.

 

[Pilot1]

The Cohen fiasco was designed to panic Trump so he'd accept a BAD nuke deal from North Korea. The ploy failed miserably. The Democrats were willing to put America more at risk for politics. It didn't work.

 

[Redfish]

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

Just to set the record straight.

North Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

Kim’s position was no surprise, the official said, because it had been brought up repeatedly in lower-level talks. But Trump and his negotiators decided lifting the sanctions posed from 2016 onward was too much.

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui said Trump’s reaction puzzled Kim. He said that Kim “may have lost his will [to continue] North Korea-U.S. dealings,” AP reported.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

So, Trump lied - again. What a surprise. Is Kim more honorable than Trump?

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

 

[rightwinger]

Doesn’t address the impact of having a soldier like Trump fighting for the Red, White and Blue

Trump had years of
You are a fucking moron

It was Bush who broke off the pursuit of Bin Laden at Tora Bora and refused to follow him into Pakistan

It was the Great Obama who attacked inside Pakistan to kill bin Laden

Actually it was Clinton who could have taken him before 9/11 when Sudan told him where he was. 9/11 happened because Clinton did not have the balls to act, and yes, obozo did the right thing in authorizing the hit on Bin Laden, but its also true that he was very scared of what the Paki's might do after we "engaged in an act or war" inside Pakistan (his words, not mine)

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath (perjury). 9/11 happened because he was more interested in sticking cigars up the bottom of an intern than doing his job as president.

Lying about a blowjob is still about a blowjob. If Republicans want to stick to their guns and claim that meets the standard of impeachment....then fine

That is the standard we will apply to Trump

the charge was perjury. the subject of the lie doesn't matter, he lied under oath. He took advantage of a young employee in the oval office multiple times, he raped and groped women regularly. He had his buddy Webb Hubbell impregnate Hillary because he couldn't and they thought a kid would help them politically. The Clintons are slime.

I agree with you except for your conspiracy rant about Hubbell. That makes you look like an idiot

If Republicans want the standard for impeachment to be lying about a blow job then Dems can apply the same standard to paying bribes to porn stars right before an election

 

[rightwinger]

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

Just to set the record straight.

North Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

Kim’s position was no surprise, the official said, because it had been brought up repeatedly in lower-level talks. But Trump and his negotiators decided lifting the sanctions posed from 2016 onward was too much.

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui said Trump’s reaction puzzled Kim. He said that Kim “may have lost his will [to continue] North Korea-U.S. dealings,” AP reported.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

So, Trump lied - again. What a surprise. Is Kim more honorable than Trump?

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

Obama gave Iran back its own money for satisfying the terms of sanctions

 

[rightwinger]

The Cohen fiasco was designed to panic Trump so he'd accept a BAD nuke deal from North Korea. The ploy failed miserably. The Democrats were willing to put America more at risk for politics. It didn't work.

Trump did take his eye off the ball by admitting he watched testimony rather than prepare for the meeting

 

[basquebromance]

questions for every Democratic presidential candidate...

"Do you support the President's policy of complete, verifiable, irreversible denuclearization of the North Korean regime? If so, how would you achieve it?

2) What would you do differently than Trump on North Korea? Be specific. I appreciate President Trump doing something different, as all other past efforts have failed miserably." - Lindsey Graham

 

[Redfish]

Actually it was Clinton who could have taken him before 9/11 when Sudan told him where he was. 9/11 happened because Clinton did not have the balls to act, and yes, obozo did the right thing in authorizing the hit on Bin Laden, but its also true that he was very scared of what the Paki's might do after we "engaged in an act or war" inside Pakistan (his words, not mine)

LOL

Republicans were too busy impeaching over a blow job

Clinton’s efforts to kill bin Laden were mocked as wagging the dog

A distraction from their blow job impeachment

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath (perjury). 9/11 happened because he was more interested in sticking cigars up the bottom of an intern than doing his job as president.

Lying about a blowjob is still about a blowjob. If Republicans want to stick to their guns and claim that meets the standard of impeachment....then fine

That is the standard we will apply to Trump

the charge was perjury. the subject of the lie doesn't matter, he lied under oath. He took advantage of a young employee in the oval office multiple times, he raped and groped women regularly. He had his buddy Webb Hubbell impregnate Hillary because he couldn't and they thought a kid would help them politically. The Clintons are slime.

I agree with you except for your conspiracy rant about Hubbell. That makes you look like an idiot

If Republicans want the standard for impeachment to be lying about a blow job then Dems can apply the same standard to paying bribes to porn stars right before an election

the difference is "under oath" and its not illegal to pay someone for their silence

Bill Clinton confirmed the Hubbell story, he said "yep, Webb sired her" His words, not mine. Why has Chelsea refused a DNA test that would settle it?

 

[Redfish]

The Cohen fiasco was designed to panic Trump so he'd accept a BAD nuke deal from North Korea. The ploy failed miserably. The Democrats were willing to put America more at risk for politics. It didn't work.

Trump did take his eye off the ball by admitting he watched testimony rather than prepare for the meeting

what a crock, of course he was prepared for the meeting. Give it a rest, winger. You just make yourself look stupid with this kind of crap.

 

[Redfish]

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

Just to set the record straight.

North Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

Kim’s position was no surprise, the official said, because it had been brought up repeatedly in lower-level talks. But Trump and his negotiators decided lifting the sanctions posed from 2016 onward was too much.

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui said Trump’s reaction puzzled Kim. He said that Kim “may have lost his will [to continue] North Korea-U.S. dealings,” AP reported.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

So, Trump lied - again. What a surprise. Is Kim more honorable than Trump?

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

Obama gave Iran back its own money for satisfying the terms of sanctions

some of it was their money that had been frozen in American banks, most of it was a gift from their muslim brother, Obama.

 

[forkup]

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

Just to set the record straight.

North Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

Kim’s position was no surprise, the official said, because it had been brought up repeatedly in lower-level talks. But Trump and his negotiators decided lifting the sanctions posed from 2016 onward was too much.

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui said Trump’s reaction puzzled Kim. He said that Kim “may have lost his will [to continue] North Korea-U.S. dealings,” AP reported.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

So, Trump lied - again. What a surprise. Is Kim more honorable than Trump?

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

 

[forkup]

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

Obama gave Iran back its own money for satisfying the terms of sanctions

some of it was their money that had been frozen in American banks, most of it was a gift from their muslim brother, Obama.

Again, first substantiate Obama is a Muslim, then explain why giving something in return for something else is a gift? A gift is something you do when you DON'T get anything?

 

[Redfish]

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

Just to set the record straight.

North Korea had the more accurate take on what happened at the summit with President Donald Trump before talks failed, according to an official with the U.S. State Department.

The president claimed Thursday that he had walked away from negotiations in Hanoi after Kim Jong Un demanded that all sanctions against the nation be lifted.

“Basically, they wanted the sanctions lifted in their entirety, and we couldn’t do that,” Trump said. “We had to walk away from that.”

But Pyongyang representatives called a late night news conference later that day to correct Trump’s statements, saying that Kim wanted only economic sanctions imposed since 2016 lifted — and not any concerning weapons. In exchange, Kim offered to shut down the nation’s main nuclear complex — and was prepared to offer in writing a permanent halt to the nation’s nuclear and intercontinental ballistic missile tests, according to his officials.

North Korea’s account of the sanction issue was accurate, a State Department official said Friday in a briefing to the media, The Associated Press reported that Kim had sought the lifting only of United Nations Security Council sanctions imposed since March 2016 — not sanctions going back decades. The concession would have removed sanctions on a range of goods, but not weapons.

Kim’s position was no surprise, the official said, because it had been brought up repeatedly in lower-level talks. But Trump and his negotiators decided lifting the sanctions posed from 2016 onward was too much.

Vice Foreign Minister Choe Sun Hui said Trump’s reaction puzzled Kim. He said that Kim “may have lost his will [to continue] North Korea-U.S. dealings,” AP reported.

Kim — Not Trump — Was Right About Summit Snag, Says State Department

So, Trump lied - again. What a surprise. Is Kim more honorable than Trump?

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

 

[forkup]

It is a sad state of affairs when reports out of the North Korean government are more reliable than reports from an American President

well crap, a few days ago you said that all the info was coming from Russia. Try to keep track of your lies, winger.

It reflects badly on the man you voted for that he has so little credibility that Kim Jong Un is believed more

BTW, you never gave us the reference to the congressional bill that approved and appropriated the 150 billion that Obama gave to Iran.

Please provide that. OR, you could just admit that Obama committed an act of treason when he did it.

First link the figure of 150 billion. Then explain why negotiating (you give something, I give something) is treason. I'm fine with the argument if you can substantiate it.

Obama got nothing from Iran in exchange for the money. Their nuclear program continues today, they continue to support terrorists today. He got nothing, they got everything they wanted. They won, Obama lost. 150 billion is the figure the media reported, its not my number

Nothing? You mean a moratorium on the development of nuclear weapons is nothing? Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that exactly what Trump went to Hanoi for?