No more tokens: Vote Trump to stop the dog and pony show

[TheGreatGatsby]

 

[SwimExpert]

It's hard to believe anyone's gullible enough to bend over for this shit.

Great video. But you missed my point. His statement makes no actual, logical sense. He simultaneously says that Trump is equally part of the problem the OP sees, as well as the only possible solution.

 

[bripat9643]

Apparently enforcing any law is "authoritarian."

Well, that is what you just told us concerning enforcing the RICO laws against global warming denier fraudsters.

Yes, Bri, we get it. You only want certain laws enforced. If you own side is lawbreaking, you want the laws ignored.

That's a fucking joke, right?

Unfortunately it's not. Mamooth is the joke. She believes she's a liberal. She's about as liberal as Pol Pot.

 

[Flopper]

eminent domain has been an issue as well....many land owners are refusing to cooperate...to sell their land...

Building Trump's Great Wall would face some big problems including eminent domain.

• Trump would have steal land from hundreds if not thousands of land owners but the problems don't end there.
• Much of land is protected by law and some of the land is even owned by Mexican government.
• The Boundary Treaty with Mexico that covers 24 miles of the Rio Grande and Colorado River and surrounding area to insures water flow is administered jointly by Mexico and the US. This is only one a number places where the US and Mexico would have to come to new agreements.
• In some places, treaty obligations and river flood zones would require the wall be built well into the United States, which would be awkward if the Mexican government is paying for it and overseeing the project. In addition to creating a sort of no-man's land between the wall and the actual border, one government or the other would have to buy large amounts of private property as well as land owned by at least one Indian tribe whose territory straddles the border in southern Arizona.
• In areas where the border is defined on dry land across New Mexico, most of Arizona and California, structures have to be built so the wall doesn't obstruct natural run-off routes or otherwise induce flooding. Building in those areas can be complicated and costly. In sensitive sand dunes in Southern California, for instance, a "floating fence" had to be built to allow the natural movements of the dunes.
• Lawsuits by Groups such as Defenders of Wildlife and the Sierra Club could delay the construction for years as there are a number environmental issues.
• A total of 18 federally protected species may be found along certain sections of the California border, and at least 39 federally endangered, threatened, or candidate species live along the Arizona border, according to the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
• Then there's the cost issue. Congress would have to approve ever cent spent on the wall. Numerous fact-checking organizations have taken issue with Trump's estimate that the wall would be built for $10 billion to $12 billion. Figures released by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Congressional Research Service indicate that the total cost of the 650-mile fence has been for $7 billion. And that doesn't include maintenance and upkeep. Nor does it include additional personnel to guard the wall or the installation of intrusion detection devices. Trump's 1,000 mile or 2,000 mile wall which seems to change each time Trump addresses it, would cost far more than Trump estiments.
• And don't think Mexico will pay a dime of the cost. President Enrique Peña Nieto said "there is no scenario" under which Mexico will pay for the wall." Experts seem to agree on this point. Trump's proposals of making illegals in the US pay for it or forcing Mexico to pay through trade and visa restrictions is not only impractical but illegal.

In reality, Trump's Great Wall will become a metaphor for increased boarder security.

ttp://www.businessinsider.com/can-donald-trumps-build-wall-mexico-2016-3

 

[Pogo]

It's hard to believe anyone's gullible enough to bend over for this shit.

Great video. But you missed my point. His statement makes no actual, logical sense. He simultaneously says that Trump is equally part of the problem the OP sees, as well as the only possible solution.

I don't know what he said about that, though I'm sure it's as entertaining as it usually is. I was addressing his childlike gullibility in believing that the tooth fairy Rump is going to leave a dollar under his pillow build a wall and make Mexico pay for it, the sentence highlighted.