- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #301
You continue to weave a pattern to decieve and get caught out as usual. I was talking about MR and the social values conservative candidates, which NG certainly is not.
Newt is far preferable to the scv wacks, but, no, he is not waging a war against an existential assault on Christendom either.
Mitt is preferable but Newt is also acceptable.
Oh, please guy, Mitt has been trying to pass himself off as a "social values Conservative" for the last five years now.
Except no one believes it for a moment.
And that's the problem he has. Except for the Mormons and the Wall Street Parasites who think happy days will be here again, no one is buying Mitt's BS.
I'm sure we'll see you find ways to attack Newt in the coming weeks.
Because you can't really define reasons why anyone should vote for Mittens.
There are many reasons, but you conveniently dismiss them. That's fine, that's your perogative, but please don't act as if you know what you are talking about.
Newt? I have alread said above what his challenges will be. Let's see if he meets them.