New WSJ/NBC poll - Donald losing more ground

[Roudy]

Yes, YOU'RE dismissed. Even the left admits that Rasmussen was far more accurate than they.

I'm not the one citing a sham organization who analyzed the data with a clear cut objective.

They are one of many including those on the left that have confirmed that Ramussen was one of a few that had the election right. But since you're a Libtard with your head up Uranus you won't accept the truth.

 

[DrLove]

Yes, YOU'RE dismissed. Even the left admits that Rasmussen was far more accurate than they.

I'm not the one citing a sham organization who analyzed the data with a clear cut objective.

They are one of many including those on the left that have confirmed that Ramussen was one of a few that had the election right. But since you're a Libtard with your head up Uranus you won't accept the truth.

Link me to "those on the left".

LoL

 

[Roudy]

Yes, YOU'RE dismissed. Even the left admits that Rasmussen was far more accurate than they.

I'm not the one citing a sham organization who analyzed the data with a clear cut objective.

They are one of many including those on the left that have confirmed that Ramussen was one of a few that had the election right. But since you're a Libtard with your head up Uranus you won't accept the truth.

Link me to "those on the left".

LoL

Trump Leads Clinton in Rasmussen Poll, But It's a Major Outlier

Donald Trump tweet on 50% approval cherry-picks polling data

According to the rundown in RealClearPolitics, Rasmussen was the only pollster to get the popular vote result -- a two-point Hillary Clinton win -- correct in its final pre-election poll. Two pollsters (Monmouth University and NBC News/Survey Monkey) had Clinton winning by six points; four (ABC News/Washington Post, CBS News, Fox News, and Economist/YouGov) had Clinton winning by four, two (Bloomberg and Reuters/Ipsos) had Clinton winning by three, one (IBD/TIPP) had Trump winning by two, and one had Trump winning by five (Los Angeles Times/USC).

 

[DrLove]

Yes, YOU'RE dismissed. Even the left admits that Rasmussen was far more accurate than they.

I'm not the one citing a sham organization who analyzed the data with a clear cut objective.

They are one of many including those on the left that have confirmed that Ramussen was one of a few that had the election right. But since you're a Libtard with your head up Uranus you won't accept the truth.

Link me to "those on the left".

LoL

Trump Leads Clinton in Rasmussen Poll, But It's a Major Outlier

Donald Trump tweet on 50% approval cherry-picks polling data

According to the rundown in RealClearPolitics, Rasmussen was the only pollster to get the popular vote result -- a two-point Hillary Clinton win -- correct in its final pre-election poll. Two pollsters (Monmouth University and NBC News/Survey Monkey) had Clinton winning by six points; four (ABC News/Washington Post, CBS News, Fox News, and Economist/YouGov) had Clinton winning by four, two (Bloomberg and Reuters/Ipsos) had Clinton winning by three, one (IBD/TIPP) had Trump winning by two, and one had Trump winning by five (Los Angeles Times/USC).

Your first link is from June of 2016 - meaningless

And from your second link, this:

However, it’s worth taking this with a grain of salt. First, the polls that had Clinton winning by two or three points were all very close to the mark once margins of error are taken into account. And second, Rasmussen was lucky to have its two-point margin come during the final pre-election poll. During the last week before the election, its daily results were scattered -- Clinton by three, tie, tie, Trump by three, tie, and Clinton by two.

Overall, FiveThirtyEight’s comprehensive pollster ratings gives Rasmussen the mediocre grade of C-plus, and it found a two-point Republican bias in its polls. (This rating did not encompass the entire 2016 campaign, but it did go back earlier; it factored in 657 polls by Rasmussen.)​

Intelligent people pay little attention to a robo-pollster that calls mostly land lines aka "old white people".

Dismissed for the final time.

 

[Roudy]

Yes, YOU'RE dismissed. Even the left admits that Rasmussen was far more accurate than they.

I'm not the one citing a sham organization who analyzed the data with a clear cut objective.

They are one of many including those on the left that have confirmed that Ramussen was one of a few that had the election right. But since you're a Libtard with your head up Uranus you won't accept the truth.

Link me to "those on the left".

LoL

Trump Leads Clinton in Rasmussen Poll, But It's a Major Outlier

Donald Trump tweet on 50% approval cherry-picks polling data

According to the rundown in RealClearPolitics, Rasmussen was the only pollster to get the popular vote result -- a two-point Hillary Clinton win -- correct in its final pre-election poll. Two pollsters (Monmouth University and NBC News/Survey Monkey) had Clinton winning by six points; four (ABC News/Washington Post, CBS News, Fox News, and Economist/YouGov) had Clinton winning by four, two (Bloomberg and Reuters/Ipsos) had Clinton winning by three, one (IBD/TIPP) had Trump winning by two, and one had Trump winning by five (Los Angeles Times/USC).

Your first link is from June of 2016 - meaningless

And from your second link, this:

However, it’s worth taking this with a grain of salt. First, the polls that had Clinton winning by two or three points were all very close to the mark once margins of error are taken into account. And second, Rasmussen was lucky to have its two-point margin come during the final pre-election poll. During the last week before the election, its daily results were scattered -- Clinton by three, tie, tie, Trump by three, tie, and Clinton by two.

Overall, FiveThirtyEight’s comprehensive pollster ratings gives Rasmussen the mediocre grade of C-plus, and it found a two-point Republican bias in its polls. (This rating did not encompass the entire 2016 campaign, but it did go back earlier; it factored in 657 polls by Rasmussen.)​

Intelligent people pay little attention to a robo-pollster that calls mostly land lines aka "old white people".

Dismissed for the final time.

Like I said, it's a Leftwing source trying to spin the fact that Rasmussen got it right and they got egg on their faces. Take that with a "Grain of salt". LOL

But wait....THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING!

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Mac1958, post: 19749154

Why did you dishonestly add the word "automatically" to your question, which completely changed my point?

I guess you are not interested in responding to my entire point. I don't see any onus you have placed on Trumpo needing to recognize the FACT that he lost the popular vote and should try to govern in a way to try to appeal to those that did not vote for him. And since you don't mention Trumpo's responsibility to the entire electorate you expect the never trump voters to be 'happy' no matter what Trumpo does.

I showed you a very clear example of Trumpo lying and basically lumping me in with his fiction of millions of illegal voters.

Trumpo has done many things for which every American has perfectly normal and fair reasons to be unhappy with his presidency.

I want and hope any president does well just like you. However I don't see anything going on in the White House right now being dome well.

He lies about him defeating Isis. He just lied on Monday that the three million jobs created since election day only happened because of him. He says no one would have predicted back then that three million jobs would be created by now.

Trumpo is such a liar.

Three million jobs since Trumpo was elected is certainly not better than the rate of job creation during the last year and a half of the Obama Administration.

So Trumpo is a liar.

You want me to automatically be happy with Trumpo's lies

Sorry Charlie. I'm not putting my head in the sand with the bold faced liar in the White House that sits there now

 

[Mac1958]

You want me to automatically be happy with Trumpo's lies

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.
.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

 

[Mac1958]

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie. Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

He is a liar.

So are you.
.

 

[skookerasbil]

DRUDGE REPORT 2018®

Right now on The DRUDGE Report.......

TRUMP HOLDS AT 50%


Whos not winning?

 

[RealDave]

And if you go to the poll itself - You'll not that the "strongly approve" number is 22% and "strongly disapprove" is double that at 44. Sad

President Trump’s job approval rating slipped 4 points in a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.

Thirty-nine percent of respondents now approve of the job the president is doing, compared to 57 percent who disapprove.

Trump's support fell among Republicans, whites, men, independents, women and Democrats.​

Trump job approval slips 4 points to 39 percent in NBC poll

Trump needs to find another porn star to fuck to get his ratings to go back up with his base.

 

[RealDave]

I love it when Leftards start quoting those fake polls concocted by fake news sources.

"Everyone is lying but me"

And you dipsticks are buying it.

 

[Indeependent]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

Illegals voting in Dem districts is very easy.

 

[RealDave]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

Illegals voting in Dem districts is very easy.

Yet another moron who thinks that people hiding from the government will walk into a government facility where they might have to show ID.

Can you assholes get any dumber? Really.

 

[mudwhistle]

Cherry picking polls is just that, cherry picking.

One can find a poll to suit any desired agenda

Sorry no - The poll averages are indeed within the statistical margins of error. This one was 3.7 points. Take 6 or 8 of them, average out and you get a fairly accurate snapshot.

Even if Rasmussen is included.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

Yeah so were the ones assuring you Cankles would win....polls are worthless

The polls said that she would get the most votes...and she did. No one polled for the Electoral College dumbass. BTW, grown ups call her Hillary Clinton.

Hillary calls us every name in the book, so I think we should return the favor.

BTW, Hillary didn't get more legal votes, or most of them wouldn't have come from North Mexico (California). Trump won more states than Hillary and more electoral votes and that's all that's all that counts.

 

[Indeependent]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

Illegals voting in Dem districts is very easy.

Yet another moron who thinks that people hiding from the government will walk into a government facility where they might have to show ID.

Can you assholes get any dumber? Really.

I work the polls; illegals vote.

 

[Indeependent]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

Illegals voting in Dem districts is very easy.

Yet another moron who thinks that people hiding from the government will walk into a government facility where they might have to show ID.

Can you assholes get any dumber? Really.

What!
ID is required to vote?
Where the hell do you live?
You really are full of shit!

 

[RealDave]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

Illegals voting in Dem districts is very easy.

Yet another moron who thinks that people hiding from the government will walk into a government facility where they might have to show ID.

Can you assholes get any dumber? Really.

I work the polls; illegals vote.

Why didn't you have them arrested?

 

[RealDave]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

Illegals voting in Dem districts is very easy.

Yet another moron who thinks that people hiding from the government will walk into a government facility where they might have to show ID.

Can you assholes get any dumber? Really.

What!
ID is required to vote?
Where the hell do you live?
You really are full of shit!

You need ID to register to vote. Dumbass.
You could be asked at the polls to show ID.
Of course, you live in Trump World with the rest of the stupid people.

 

[Indeependent]

Mac1958, post: 1975178

Just another example of why it's impossible to communicate with hardcore partisan ideologues. When challenged, they just lie.

You cannot define what you think is a lie.

Did Trump say what I said he said about three million illegal voters? Or do you just automatically believe whatever that liar says?

Illegals voting in Dem districts is very easy.

Yet another moron who thinks that people hiding from the government will walk into a government facility where they might have to show ID.

Can you assholes get any dumber? Really.

I work the polls; illegals vote.

Why didn't you have them arrested?

Arrest a bus full of Illegals and start a riot?
That’s above my paygrade.
We tell them to turn around and have a nice day.
And that’s in the suburbs in an area where the odds are I won’t be stabbed.