New research totally debunks global warming!!!

[TyroneSlothrop]

Oh bullshit they've been getting caught time after time after time, get off the left loon sites and get informed, meme troll

No one got caught ...this report is HOGWASH ..it is not peer reviewed it has no science none

Get informed, loon. I know better.

You loons are too stupid to even know it's BS.

Its hogwash.,..it is not peer reviewed its from Breitbart ...'Nuff said ...
Conservatives are again denying the very existence of global warming
Posted on 10 July 2017 by dana1981
As we well know, climate myths are like zombies that never seem to die. It’s only a matter of time before they rise from the dead and threaten to eat our brains. And so here we go again – American conservatives are denying the very existence of global warming.

Working backwards from a politically-motivated conclusion
The claim is based on what can charitably be described as a white paper, written by fossil fuel-funded contrarians Joseph D’Aleo and Craig Idso along with James Wallace III. Two months ago, D’Aleo and Wallace published another error-riddled white paper on the same website with fellow contrarian John Christy; both papers aimed to undermine the EPA’s Endangerment Finding.

The Endangerment Finding concluded that the scientific research clearly shows that carbon pollution endangers public health and welfare via climate change impacts, and therefore according to the US Supreme Court, the EPA must regulate carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act. Conservatives who benefit from the fossil fuel status quo and oppose all climate policies have urged the Trump administration to go after the Endangerment Finding.

Both papers are rife with flaws because they start from a desired conclusion – that the science underpinning Endangerment Finding is somehow wrong – and work backwards trying to support it. In this paper, the contrarians try to undermine the accuracy of the global surface temperature record, which has been validated time and time again. They don’t bother trying to hide their bias – the paper refers to “Climate Alarmists” and speaks of invalidating the Endangerment Finding.

The errors in the white paper
The paper itself has little scientific content. Using charts taken from climate denier blogs, the authors claim that every temperature record adjustment since the 1980s has been in the warming direction, which is simply false. As Zeke Hausfather pointed out, referencing work by Nick Stokes, roughly half of the adjustments have resulted in cooling and half in warming. Moreover, the net adjustment to the raw data actually reduces the long-term global warming trend:

 

[OldLady]

I thought this might be the first report from the EPA's new program to "critique" climate science. I thought it came awfully quickly, though.
EPA Head Reportedly Launching Program to 'Critique' Climate Science

 

[skookerasbil]

Thread summary: Deniers have all fallen hard for yet another fictional propaganda piece, one made by some very, very well paid fossil fuel company shills. They never learn, deniers. After all if they could learn, they wouldn't be deniers. Each time their conspiracy frauds gets busted, they just ignore it and move right on to the next fraud.

If someone says temperature records have been adjusted to make warming look bigger, they are lying. That's not debatable. It doesn't matter what their motivation for lying is, or if they think they're not lying, they're still lying nonetheless. In the real world, the adjustments to temperature have made the warming look _smaller_.

Therefore, the main denier conspiracy theory craters hard, hence anyone still spouting it is a cult retard. Deniers will now weep and cry about getting busted for fraud again, but nobody cares what that pack of America-hating Putin-stooges does any more.

 

[skookerasbil]

Oh bullshit they've been getting caught time after time after time, get off the left loon sites and get informed, meme troll

No one got caught ...this report is HOGWASH ..it is not peer reviewed it has no science none

Get informed, loon. I know better.

You loons are too stupid to even know it's BS.

Its hogwash.,..it is not peer reviewed its from Breitbart ...'Nuff said ...
Conservatives are again denying the very existence of global warming
Posted on 10 July 2017 by dana1981
As we well know, climate myths are like zombies that never seem to die. It’s only a matter of time before they rise from the dead and threaten to eat our brains. And so here we go again – American conservatives are denying the very existence of global warming.

Working backwards from a politically-motivated conclusion
The claim is based on what can charitably be described as a white paper, written by fossil fuel-funded contrarians Joseph D’Aleo and Craig Idso along with James Wallace III. Two months ago, D’Aleo and Wallace published another error-riddled white paper on the same website with fellow contrarian John Christy; both papers aimed to undermine the EPA’s Endangerment Finding.

The Endangerment Finding concluded that the scientific research clearly shows that carbon pollution endangers public health and welfare via climate change impacts, and therefore according to the US Supreme Court, the EPA must regulate carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act. Conservatives who benefit from the fossil fuel status quo and oppose all climate policies have urged the Trump administration to go after the Endangerment Finding.

Both papers are rife with flaws because they start from a desired conclusion – that the science underpinning Endangerment Finding is somehow wrong – and work backwards trying to support it. In this paper, the contrarians try to undermine the accuracy of the global surface temperature record, which has been validated time and time again. They don’t bother trying to hide their bias – the paper refers to “Climate Alarmists” and speaks of invalidating the Endangerment Finding.

The errors in the white paper
The paper itself has little scientific content. Using charts taken from climate denier blogs, the authors claim that every temperature record adjustment since the 1980s has been in the warming direction, which is simply false. As Zeke Hausfather pointed out, referencing work by Nick Stokes, roughly half of the adjustments have resulted in cooling and half in warming. Moreover, the net adjustment to the raw data actually reduces the long-term global warming trend:

This is called...........a progressives head exploding following the launch into panic mode!!

Of course the religion is going to get hysterical when stuff like this goes public.........and its quite simple. The researchers looked at how the published data was arrived at and called bs. Its quite that simple..........rigging the data is ghey.

 

[MaryL]

duh.....the data is fake.



Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"

As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:


Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data" | Zero Hedge


Read the full abstract provided in the link.............

You have to be kidding. I can believe your nonsense, or can believe my own eyes. Sorry, you lose. What kind of rubes do you take us for?

 

[skookerasbil]

[Missed the post where they admitted to fudging data didn't ya, loon?

Obviously, I've seen many posts where deniers tell that lie. It's what your masters command, after all.

However, your cult has a problem. Your old lies have been debunked so many times that nobody pays any attention to them. You're in desperate need of some fresh material.

Really s0n..........then why is your side losing? Trump pulled out of Paris........heads are still exploding weeks later.

Nobody is paying attention to the warmists..........when is the last time weve seen even a smidge of climate change legislation from congress? Not in ten years..........because nobody is paying attention to the k00ks. And global warming is now a non-issue in political campaigns on both sides........not even mentioned.........because nobody is paying attention to the k00ks. The EPA is getting whacked upside of the head as we speak.........because nobody is paying attention to the k00ks. Cap and Trade was supposed to be the slam dunk for warmists everywhere, "the science demands it".........and what happened? Its been dead as a doornail for almost 9 years.......because nobody is paying attention to the k00ks.

When you throw bombs for 20 years about Miami being underwater by now and the arctic ice being "disappeared"......and when you predict massive damage from hurricane after Cat 5 hurricane and no hurricanes come for 12 years.......nobody pays attention to the dickishness.

Debunked or not...............who's not winning?

 

[skookerasbil]

duh.....the data is fake.



Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"

As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:


Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data" | Zero Hedge


Read the full abstract provided in the link.............

You have to be kidding. I can believe your nonsense, or can believe my own eyes. Sorry, you lose. What kind of rubes do you take us for?

sweets.........show us all where your side is winning in the real world?


Some links please.............

 

[skookerasbil]

Cool the past, warm the present. Smooth out the bumpy parts. Voila! The models look great.

I thought it was Santer but it was actually Wigley who said this-

From: Tom Wigley <[email protected]>
To: Phil Jones <[email protected]>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <[email protected]>

"Phil, Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip. If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I'm sure you know). So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean -- but we'd still have to explain the land blip.

I've chosen 0.15 here deliberately. This still leaves an ocean blip, and i think one needs to have some form of ocean blip to explain the land blip (via either some common forcing, or ocean forcing land, or vice versa, or all of these). When you look at other blips, the land blips are 1.5 to 2 times (roughly) the ocean blips -- higher sensitivity plus thermal inertia effects. My 0.15 adjustment leaves things consistent with this, so you can see where I am coming from. Removing ENSO does not affect this. It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with "why the blip".

Now look at the maturity graph. Anything look odd at 1940? Hahahaha, what a bunch of crooks. Science is supposed to lead you in the direction of the truth. These guys decide what the truth is and then look for evidence to support their position. If none can be found then they just make up shit.

Ian dude.......some brilliant stuff.

We do have to remember that most of the climate crusaders in here are unicorn chasers as well. They'll all happily buy a big old bag of dog doo for $2,500 a pop if its packaged up just right. Connect the dots issues are ghey.

 

[skookerasbil]

Oh bullshit they've been getting caught time after time after time, get off the left loon sites and get informed, meme troll

No one got caught ...this report is HOGWASH ..it is not peer reviewed it has no science none

Get informed, loon. I know better.

You loons are too stupid to even know it's BS.

Its hogwash.,..it is not peer reviewed its from Breitbart ...'Nuff said ...
Conservatives are again denying the very existence of global warming
Posted on 10 July 2017 by dana1981
As we well know, climate myths are like zombies that never seem to die. It’s only a matter of time before they rise from the dead and threaten to eat our brains. And so here we go again – American conservatives are denying the very existence of global warming.

Working backwards from a politically-motivated conclusion
The claim is based on what can charitably be described as a white paper, written by fossil fuel-funded contrarians Joseph D’Aleo and Craig Idso along with James Wallace III. Two months ago, D’Aleo and Wallace published another error-riddled white paper on the same website with fellow contrarian John Christy; both papers aimed to undermine the EPA’s Endangerment Finding.

The Endangerment Finding concluded that the scientific research clearly shows that carbon pollution endangers public health and welfare via climate change impacts, and therefore according to the US Supreme Court, the EPA must regulate carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act. Conservatives who benefit from the fossil fuel status quo and oppose all climate policies have urged the Trump administration to go after the Endangerment Finding.

Both papers are rife with flaws because they start from a desired conclusion – that the science underpinning Endangerment Finding is somehow wrong – and work backwards trying to support it. In this paper, the contrarians try to undermine the accuracy of the global surface temperature record, which has been validated time and time again. They don’t bother trying to hide their bias – the paper refers to “Climate Alarmists” and speaks of invalidating the Endangerment Finding.

The errors in the white paper
The paper itself has little scientific content. Using charts taken from climate denier blogs, the authors claim that every temperature record adjustment since the 1980s has been in the warming direction, which is simply false. As Zeke Hausfather pointed out, referencing work by Nick Stokes, roughly half of the adjustments have resulted in cooling and half in warming. Moreover, the net adjustment to the raw data actually reduces the long-term global warming trend:

lol......what a fraud this guy ^ is!! Offuckingcourse Obama-era government bureaucrats are going to hit the roof when the EPA is getting its balls kicked in.

"its from Breitbart!".............ok...........whatever you say.......

....https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf

 

[Billy_Bob]

duh.....the data is fake.



Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"

As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:


Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data" | Zero Hedge


Read the full abstract provided in the link.............

"As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.


According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:"

Damn!

"In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified.It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU."

A damning report! They show collusion of all agencies and intentional deception.. And they did it with the empirically observed facts... The alarmist have nowhere to hide.. the deception is in the light..

 

[skookerasbil]

duh.....the data is fake.



Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data"

As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:


Research Team Slams Global Warming Data In New Report: "Not Reality... Totally Inconsistent With Credible Temperature Data" | Zero Hedge


Read the full abstract provided in the link.............

"As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.


According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:"

Damn!

"In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified.It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU."

A damning report! They show collusion of all agencies and intentional deception.. And they did with the empirically observed facts... The alarmist have no where to hide.. the deception is in the light..

The deception is ghey..........and the American people know it too. Real Americans who vote know the score and have said "FUCK YOU!" to the America haters, among them, the climate k00ks. So happy to see these cheesedicks getting their nut sacks kicked harshly and the bumpy cucumbers getting immense.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Give it a rest ya old bat, the charade is over.

True. The entire planet now knows for certain that the denier cult always lies about everything.

The butthurt denier weepers here are just some crazy people on the internet. They have as much effect on the real world as the flat-earthers that they resemble so much.

I'm really surprised you didn't take off to Jonestown with Jim Jones, you're so gullible

I'm impressed that they found archived data that had not been adjusted and bastardized.. then did real science to show the fraud..

AND ITS PEER REVIEWED!

What is their excuse going to be now?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Give it a rest ya old bat, the charade is over.

True. The entire planet now knows for certain that the denier cult always lies about everything.

The butthurt denier weepers here are just some crazy people on the internet. They have as much effect on the real world as the flat-earthers that they resemble so much.

I'm really surprised you didn't take off to Jonestown with Jim Jones, you're so gullible

I'm impressed that they found archived data that had not been adjusted and bastardized.. then did real science to show the fraud..

AND ITS PEER REVIEWED!

What is their excuse going to be now?

Bunch of freaking frauds is what they are

 

[mamooth]

Words mean things, denier frauds. Having a pack of political hacks with Ph.D.'s sign their names to a piece of propaganda is not peer-review, no matter how many times you pretend it. is.

Face it, you deniers are all blubbering because you've been busted as frauds and liars, again. You can't do a thing about it, and you know it. That couldn't have happened to a more deserving pack of treasonous liars. Whenever a denier cries, an angel gets his wings.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Words mean things, denier frauds. Having a pack of political hacks with Ph.D.'s sign their names to a piece of propaganda is not peer-review, no matter how many times you pretend it. is.

Face it, you deniers are all blubbering because you've been busted as frauds and liars, again. You can't do a thing about it, and you know it. That couldn't have happened to a more deserving pack of treasonous liars. Whenever a denier cries, an angel gets his wings.

Says the little bitch that thinks having pesudim (fake name and credentials) names and reviewing your own work under them is ok... LOL

 

[mamooth]

ays the little bitch that thinks having pesudim (fake name and credentials) names and reviewing your own work under them is ok... LOL

No, I've always criticized you for doing that.

So, which pseudonyms did you use on that propaganda piece?

And on this board, how many sock accounts have you used?

 

[Billy_Bob]

ays the little bitch that thinks having pesudim (fake name and credentials) names and reviewing your own work under them is ok... LOL

No, I've always criticized you for doing that.

So, which pseudonyms did you use on that propaganda piece?

And on this board, how many sock accounts have you used?

LOL..

I have one account you little puke.. and you can ask the mods if you like... Now be a good little puke and take your lying schtick elsewhere..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Amazing how the facts show the adjustments crap...

 

[skookerasbil]

Amazing how the facts show the adjustments crap...

lol....... = nobody gives a rats ass about 0.5 degree's!!!

Flawed data promotion is ghey.

 

[skookerasbil]

Words mean things, denier frauds. Having a pack of political hacks with Ph.D.'s sign their names to a piece of propaganda is not peer-review, no matter how many times you pretend it. is.

Face it, you deniers are all blubbering because you've been busted as frauds and liars, again. You can't do a thing about it, and you know it. That couldn't have happened to a more deserving pack of treasonous liars. Whenever a denier cries, an angel gets his wings.

Billy just publically pwned you s0n!!!