New Obama ad-Julia

Governments role is not to take money from one group and give it to another. The government acts like a referee to ensure the game is played fair. It doesn't mean an equal outcome for everyone but a fair application of the rules

The game right now has rules that enable one group to acquire and protect great wealth. Not surprisingly, those rules are written by and in favor of that same group. Nobody is saying take money from that group and give it to others but to question why we still need those benefits to the wealthy if they don't need them

How do we change the rules to help working Americans? Fair labor practices, access to affordable education and training, affordable healthcare, affordable homes, a decent retirement

These are the programs being attacked by conservatives. They call these socialist programs, ridicule those who advocate these programs.......all while protecting programs for the wealthy at all costs

This country has ALWAYS been about the 'pursuit of property.' Government as a referee: :rolleyes: Jesus Christ, how flipping dumb can you be!

And FYI: I hate to burst your bubble, but those ARE socialist programs. The WORK programs of the 40s were decent programs designed to help people - to give them work. Paying women to stay at home and have as many baby daddies as she can cram into one night is NOT helping people. 50 years of generational poverty. THAT is what your oh so wonderful programs have brought to this country! Wake up and get your head out of your ass.

Student loans cause generational dependency? Worker safety and labor laws? Social security, healthcare programs?

Do you understand what socialism is? Do you think any program that helps the people is socialism?

Student loans most assuredly do in some cases, and I reference a student there on loans who flunked out of the nursing program where I tuaght. Her mother's and her hustand's question: She has borrowed $20,000. How is she going to pay it back? I have no idea. Maybe she should pray. She thought she was 'called by God' to be a nurse. Didn't think she could fail. So she played. And played. And played. And failed. With $20,000 debt. Not all who get the 'help' succeed, Mr. president.
 
Last edited:
This country has ALWAYS been about the 'pursuit of property.' Government as a referee: :rolleyes: Jesus Christ, how flipping dumb can you be!

And FYI: I hate to burst your bubble, but those ARE socialist programs. The WORK programs of the 40s were decent programs designed to help people - to give them work. Paying women to stay at home and have as many baby daddies as she can cram into one night is NOT helping people. 50 years of generational poverty. THAT is what your oh so wonderful programs have brought to this country! Wake up and get your head out of your ass.

Student loans cause generational dependency? Worker safety and labor laws? Social security, healthcare programs?

Do you understand what socialism is? Do you think any program that helps the people is socialism?

Student loans most assuredly do in some cases, and I reference a student there on loans who flunked out of the nursing program where I tuaght. Her mother's and her hustand's question: She has borrowed $20,000. How is she going to pay it back? I have no idea. Maybe she should pray. She thought she was 'called by God' to be a nurse. Didn't think she could fail. So she played. And played. And played. And failed. With $20,000 debt. Not all who get the 'help' succeed, Mr. president.

So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?
 
Student loans cause generational dependency? Worker safety and labor laws? Social security, healthcare programs?

Do you understand what socialism is? Do you think any program that helps the people is socialism?

Student loans most assuredly do in some cases, and I reference a student there on loans who flunked out of the nursing program where I tuaght. Her mother's and her hustand's question: She has borrowed $20,000. How is she going to pay it back? I have no idea. Maybe she should pray. She thought she was 'called by God' to be a nurse. Didn't think she could fail. So she played. And played. And played. And failed. With $20,000 debt. Not all who get the 'help' succeed, Mr. president.

So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*
 
Student loans most assuredly do in some cases, and I reference a student there on loans who flunked out of the nursing program where I tuaght. Her mother's and her hustand's question: She has borrowed $20,000. How is she going to pay it back? I have no idea. Maybe she should pray. She thought she was 'called by God' to be a nurse. Didn't think she could fail. So she played. And played. And played. And failed. With $20,000 debt. Not all who get the 'help' succeed, Mr. president.

So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

The Federal Government is tasked to look out for the General Welfare of "We the People"
 
Julia wants to have sex very badly, she goes to get her government issued contraception...
 
So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

The Federal Government is tasked to look out for the General Welfare of "We the People"

That's not the same as making sure everyone is on welfare, Dear
 
So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

The Federal Government is tasked to look out for the General Welfare of "We the People"
Ever read the 'General Welfare' clause Sewerboy?

NOT what it means. It means fostering Liberty and staying OUT OF THE WAY of the people to let commerce happen with minimal interference from the imperial FED.

*Dipstick*
 
NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

The Federal Government is tasked to look out for the General Welfare of "We the People"

That's not the same as making sure everyone is on welfare, Dear

General Welfare means doing what is best for the overall good of the society.

As a member of society, some things are better done as an individual and some are better done as a society
 
The Federal Government is tasked to look out for the General Welfare of "We the People"

That's not the same as making sure everyone is on welfare, Dear

General Welfare means doing what is best for the overall good of the society.

As a member of society, some things are better done as an individual and some are better done as a society

It doesn't MEAN wealth redistribution you fucking moron.
 
Student loans cause generational dependency? Worker safety and labor laws? Social security, healthcare programs?

Do you understand what socialism is? Do you think any program that helps the people is socialism?

Student loans most assuredly do in some cases, and I reference a student there on loans who flunked out of the nursing program where I tuaght. Her mother's and her hustand's question: She has borrowed $20,000. How is she going to pay it back? I have no idea. Maybe she should pray. She thought she was 'called by God' to be a nurse. Didn't think she could fail. So she played. And played. And played. And failed. With $20,000 debt. Not all who get the 'help' succeed, Mr. president.

So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

What do you think of this?

If you want to be a doctor or a nurse, your education is paid by my tax dollars (aka the state but I want to keep it real).

You in turn after graduation agree to work in the neediest parts of the country till we can get up to speed, for say 3 years but earning a paycheck. They have to be paid.

Now there's something I could rock on. And it would be money well spent.

What I don't get, is why in hell can't we ever come up with answers? I swear government is completely stupid.

And this is a bipartisan idiocy complaint.
 
Student loans most assuredly do in some cases, and I reference a student there on loans who flunked out of the nursing program where I tuaght. Her mother's and her hustand's question: She has borrowed $20,000. How is she going to pay it back? I have no idea. Maybe she should pray. She thought she was 'called by God' to be a nurse. Didn't think she could fail. So she played. And played. And played. And failed. With $20,000 debt. Not all who get the 'help' succeed, Mr. president.

So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

So the private sector is going to pay for the opportunity of higher education? On what planet?
 
The Federal Government is tasked to look out for the General Welfare of "We the People"

That's not the same as making sure everyone is on welfare, Dear

General Welfare means doing what is best for the overall good of the society.

As a member of society, some things are better done as an individual and some are better done as a society

Not if you follow First Nations. Miserable government administrations with miserable rez chiefs.

Now to an awesome effort. This is a great story. I'm going to pull a "Sophia" here.

Picture it. Home Depot wants to build a building in down town Toronto. Homeless camp is set up on said property.

Homeless advocates (the ones living in condos whilst everyone else lives in tents) refuse an offer of Home Depot to house every single person in the camp and provide them with clothing, education and job opportunities.

Finally a vote from the homeless campers got them moved out, and most of them have been complete success stories.

But the homeless advocates didn't want the homeless to succeed. They need poster children to drum up money for themselves.
 
NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

The Federal Government is tasked to look out for the General Welfare of "We the People"

That's not the same as making sure everyone is on welfare, Dear

So you never went to a public school? You're going to turn down Medicare and Social Security? You're going to help your parents pay medical expenses so they won't be on "welfare"?
 
So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

So the private sector is going to pay for the opportunity of higher education? On what planet?
TRY the Individual through HARD WORK of thier own...

Millions have done it before subsidies...WHY is it any different NOW?:eusa_whistle:
 
That's not the same as making sure everyone is on welfare, Dear

General Welfare means doing what is best for the overall good of the society.

As a member of society, some things are better done as an individual and some are better done as a society

Not if you follow First Nations. Miserable government administrations with miserable rez chiefs.

Now to an awesome effort. This is a great story. I'm going to pull a "Sophia" here.

Picture it. Home Depot wants to build a building in down town Toronto. Homeless camp is set up on said property.

Homeless advocates (the ones living in condos whilst everyone else lives in tents) refuse an offer of Home Depot to house every single person in the camp and provide them with clothing, education and job opportunities.

Finally a vote from the homeless campers got them moved out, and most of them have been complete success stories.

But the homeless advocates didn't want the homeless to succeed. They need poster children to drum up money for themselves.

In other words the Groupthink needed drones...the drones DEFIED the wishes of the groupthink elites...and took liberty for themselves...:eusa_shhh::lol:
 
So because some fail we need to stop a program which has helped millions of Americans obtain an education?

NO. What needs to be changed is where it comes from. The FEDERAL Gubmint was never tasked under the Constitution to dole out charity. THAT was for the States and the private sector to decide.

*NEXT*

So the private sector is going to pay for the opportunity of higher education? On what planet?

Why not?

Remember all the advertisements you've ever seen for "foster children" in foreign lands?

What if I started a fund for brilliant children who are inner city kids or ridge runners from the hills who don't have a chance unless we give them a hand "up".

How about I adopt one kid who's got the genius and the where with all to make it to a surgeon who can save lives? I don't have a lot of money, but I know I could squeeze that extra buck or two to make a difference.

I'd die a happy woman. :eusa_angel:
 
Really?
How are we suppose to pay for this? Talk about cradle to grave.

The Life of Julia — Barack Obama

Head Start
Obama Administration Report Shows Head Start Ineffective

17 yrs -
throw more money into the system rather than reform it to really educate them.

18 yrs.
Means add 10 million more students

22 yrs.
This is too popular not to be added to a new health care bill. I don't think this one will go away.

23 yrs-
Lilly Ledbetter Act. I don't think this is ever going to be repealed it's a non issue.

And it goes on and on.The Dem's just do not want to cut back on anything at all.
The way this is done, you would think that they are talking to a bunch of 6 year olds.
I couldn't get through the whole thing, I was laughing too hard. Just more stupid from the stupid duo of obamaturd and who was that? Oh yeah, biden.
 
Really?
How are we suppose to pay for this? Talk about cradle to grave.

The Life of Julia — Barack Obama

Head Start
Obama Administration Report Shows Head Start Ineffective

17 yrs -
throw more money into the system rather than reform it to really educate them.

18 yrs.
Means add 10 million more students

22 yrs.
This is too popular not to be added to a new health care bill. I don't think this one will go away.

23 yrs-
Lilly Ledbetter Act. I don't think this is ever going to be repealed it's a non issue.

And it goes on and on.The Dem's just do not want to cut back on anything at all.
The way this is done, you would think that they are talking to a bunch of 6 year olds.
I couldn't get through the whole thing, I was laughing too hard. Just more stupid from the stupid duo of obamaturd and who was that? Oh yeah, biden.
BIDEN is really going to bring Obama down...
 

Forum List

Back
Top