Moscow Mitch: His Week is Getting Off to a Very Bad Start!

[Toddsterpatriot]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

The advocacy group Public Citizen on Monday filed a formal ethics complaint against Senate Majority Mitch McConnell, accusing the powerful Republican of betraying his oath of office by signaling overt bias in favor of President Donald Trump even before his looming impeachment trial begins.

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

 

[hadit]

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

Yeah, the Dems really fucked that up, eh?

Trump refused to let witnesses testify...

Now he doesn't have a choice, unless McConnel buries the evidence.

I know this confuses you. The House is like a grand jury. They ONLY have to provide enough evidence to prove that charges are warranted. The Senate is the actual trial. That's where we get all the witnesses.

That's not how the Constitution reads. The Senate can run the trial any way they want to.

 

[Crepitus]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

The advocacy group Public Citizen on Monday filed a formal ethics complaint against Senate Majority Mitch McConnell, accusing the powerful Republican of betraying his oath of office by signaling overt bias in favor of President Donald Trump even before his looming impeachment trial begins.

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

If McConnell was ethical he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

That's a really really big "if".

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'm still wondering how in they hell they think they can get rid of the impeachment. Pelosi was right, Trump has been impeached, and that is gonna stick forever, even if he's not voted out by the Senate.

Remember, Clinton was impeached by the House as well, but the Senate voted to let him remain in office. That is Trump's best case scenario right now. But, with the way that some GOP senators reacted to the briefing on the killing of the general, I'm guessing that some senators are going to rethink their allegiance to Trump.

He's not impeached until Congresscriminal Pelosi passes the articles on to the Senate, for trial. She has so far, refused to do so.

Sorry about your bad luck, because they are going to hit the Senate either tomorrow or Wednesday. By the way, what is going to be your excuse when the Senate gets them? The Senate doesn't have the authority to impeach the president or not, that power rests in the House. The only thing that the Senate can do is vote the president out or let them stay.

The impeachment has happened, and is now a permanent part of Trump's legacy, just like Clinton's.

Trump's legacy will be the first impeached President to crush his Democratic opposition in an election for his second term.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'll believe that when it happens.

Congresscriminal Pelosi has a very clear motive for holding them back, and little motive to do otherwise. She surely knows damn well what will happen if they reach the Senate, and a proper trial follows, and it will not be good for her nor any of her accomplices.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

The real problem. Even Republicans know Trump is guilty... they just can't sweep it under the rug.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

Yeah, the Dems really fucked that up, eh?

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

The antics were all provided by the Republican Committee members whose over the top anger became tedious and at the same time comical. Not one defended the president, they attack the process but never once did anyone of them offer anything exculpatory.

How do defend against charges that make no sense and are not illegal?

The second article is so laughable as to be pathetic. Where is this "contempt of Congress" written in any law? It isn't! The system of checks and balances built into our Constitution does not give Congress any supremacy over the Executive branch when it comes to disagreements between the two branches. The Judicial Branch decides who wins, and the Democraps ignored that option. If the Chief Justice has any balls, he will throw that out day one.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'll believe that when it happens.

Congresscriminal Pelosi has a very clear motive for holding them back, and little motive to do otherwise. She surely knows damn well what will happen if they reach the Senate, and a proper trial follows, and it will not be good for her nor any of her accomplices.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

The real problem. Even Republicans know Trump is guilty... they just can't sweep it under the rug.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

Yeah, the Dems really fucked that up, eh?

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

The antics were all provided by the Republican Committee members whose over the top anger became tedious and at the same time comical. Not one defended the president, they attack the process but never once did anyone of them offer anything exculpatory.

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

They stopped Republicans from calling the witnesses they wanted.

Golly, I hope the Republicans don't reciprocate.

The Biden's are not relevant to the issue. They are relevant as victims of trump temerity, his usual use of character assassinations. How does Hunter Biden's history have any relevance to Trump's action to withhold money appropriate to the defense of Ukraine being under Russia's attack?

The Big Question you've ignored is this aided Russia, as did Trump's foolish move to leave Syria and provide Russian Troops to occupy our base there, and for Russian to gain hegemony in the region,

There is no evidence to relieve doubt that Trump is in bed with Putin and his efforts to reestablish Russia to it's former self. If trump is reelected we can expect Putin to ignore the Monroe Doctrine, and establish more influence in S. & C. America.

Answer some very simple questions and you will arrive at your answer.

1. Were the funds withheld and never given to Ukraine? No.

2. Did Ukraine do what was asked as a favor to Trump? No,

There you go. No quid pro quo? No crime!

You even had testimony that stated that Trump wanted no quid pro quo.

No quid pro quo? No crime!

OK, next Democrap stupidity up for discussion.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

The advocacy group Public Citizen on Monday filed a formal ethics complaint against Senate Majority Mitch McConnell, accusing the powerful Republican of betraying his oath of office by signaling overt bias in favor of President Donald Trump even before his looming impeachment trial begins.

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Impeachment is not criminal and should not be political. It is constitutional . It is a remedy for an abuse of power that undermines the constitution and endangers the democracy. That has clearly happened here

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Impeachment is not criminal and should not be political. It is constitutional . It is a remedy for an abuse of power that undermines the constitution and endangers the democracy. That has clearly happened here

Impeachment is not criminal and should not be political.

Huh?

 

[Rye Catcher]

I'll believe that when it happens.

Congresscriminal Pelosi has a very clear motive for holding them back, and little motive to do otherwise. She surely knows damn well what will happen if they reach the Senate, and a proper trial follows, and it will not be good for her nor any of her accomplices.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

The real problem. Even Republicans know Trump is guilty... they just can't sweep it under the rug.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

Yeah, the Dems really fucked that up, eh?

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

The antics were all provided by the Republican Committee members whose over the top anger became tedious and at the same time comical. Not one defended the president, they attack the process but never once did anyone of them offer anything exculpatory.

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

They stopped Republicans from calling the witnesses they wanted.

Golly, I hope the Republicans don't reciprocate.

The R's choices were irrelevant. Trump ordered those who were relevant to disobey their subpoenas.

 

[Rye Catcher]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

The advocacy group Public Citizen on Monday filed a formal ethics complaint against Senate Majority Mitch McConnell, accusing the powerful Republican of betraying his oath of office by signaling overt bias in favor of President Donald Trump even before his looming impeachment trial begins.

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet. High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes, the former suggests a felony and the latter less than a felony but more than an infraction.

You and others who hate Democrats and excuse trump are grasping at straws in the wind.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'll believe that when it happens.

Congresscriminal Pelosi has a very clear motive for holding them back, and little motive to do otherwise. She surely knows damn well what will happen if they reach the Senate, and a proper trial follows, and it will not be good for her nor any of her accomplices.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

The real problem. Even Republicans know Trump is guilty... they just can't sweep it under the rug.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

Yeah, the Dems really fucked that up, eh?

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

The antics were all provided by the Republican Committee members whose over the top anger became tedious and at the same time comical. Not one defended the president, they attack the process but never once did anyone of them offer anything exculpatory.

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

They stopped Republicans from calling the witnesses they wanted.

Golly, I hope the Republicans don't reciprocate.

The R's choices were irrelevant. Trump ordered those who were relevant to disobey their subpoenas.

The R's choices were irrelevant.

According to the Dems.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet. High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes, the former suggests a felony and the latter less than a felony but more than an infraction.

You and others who hate Democrats and excuse trump are grasping at straws in the wind.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet.

And it happens to be true.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes

So charge him criminally.

 

[Rye Catcher]

I'll believe that when it happens.

Congresscriminal Pelosi has a very clear motive for holding them back, and little motive to do otherwise. She surely knows damn well what will happen if they reach the Senate, and a proper trial follows, and it will not be good for her nor any of her accomplices.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

The real problem. Even Republicans know Trump is guilty... they just can't sweep it under the rug.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

Yeah, the Dems really fucked that up, eh?

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

The antics were all provided by the Republican Committee members whose over the top anger became tedious and at the same time comical. Not one defended the president, they attack the process but never once did anyone of them offer anything exculpatory.

How do defend against charges that make no sense and are not illegal?

The second article is so laughable as to be pathetic. Where is this "contempt of Congress" written in any law? It isn't! The system of checks and balances built into our Constitution does not give Congress any supremacy over the Executive branch when it comes to disagreements between the two branches. The Judicial Branch decides who wins, and the Democraps ignored that option. If the Chief Justice has any balls, he will throw that out day one.

Oh, so to direct someone to ignore a subpoena to testify under oath, or to refuse to release documents, is not a crime?

If these behaviors were to have occurred before a Grand Jury, each member given immunity to appear or to provide documents would be taken to jail until they acquiesce. The only reason a Grand Jury was not called is because the Attorney General was hand picked by the Defendant, and would never have the integrity to recuse himself.

 

[westwall]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Impeachment is not criminal and should not be political. It is constitutional . It is a remedy for an abuse of power that undermines the constitution and endangers the democracy. That has clearly happened here

And it is obvious to anyone with a functional brain that he hasn't abused his power.

Obummer though, we have clear evidence that he most certainly did.

 

[westwall]

I'll believe that when it happens.

Congresscriminal Pelosi has a very clear motive for holding them back, and little motive to do otherwise. She surely knows damn well what will happen if they reach the Senate, and a proper trial follows, and it will not be good for her nor any of her accomplices.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

The real problem. Even Republicans know Trump is guilty... they just can't sweep it under the rug.

A proper trial is calling witnesses and finding out what happened.

Yeah, the Dems really fucked that up, eh?

How did the Democrats "fuck up"?

The antics were all provided by the Republican Committee members whose over the top anger became tedious and at the same time comical. Not one defended the president, they attack the process but never once did anyone of them offer anything exculpatory.

How do defend against charges that make no sense and are not illegal?

The second article is so laughable as to be pathetic. Where is this "contempt of Congress" written in any law? It isn't! The system of checks and balances built into our Constitution does not give Congress any supremacy over the Executive branch when it comes to disagreements between the two branches. The Judicial Branch decides who wins, and the Democraps ignored that option. If the Chief Justice has any balls, he will throw that out day one.

Oh, so to direct someone to ignore a subpoena to testify under oath, or to refuse to release documents, is not a crime?

If these behaviors were to have occurred before a Grand Jury, each member given immunity to appear or to provide documents would be taken to jail until they acquiesce. The only reason a Grand Jury was not called is because the Attorney General was hand picked by the Defendant, and would never have the integrity to recuse himself.

Yeah, it's not. If Congress weren't so intent on abusing the COTUS they would subpoena, and when denied take their case to the Court....as the COTUS tells them to do.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

The advocacy group Public Citizen on Monday filed a formal ethics complaint against Senate Majority Mitch McConnell, accusing the powerful Republican of betraying his oath of office by signaling overt bias in favor of President Donald Trump even before his looming impeachment trial begins.

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

Funny??

CN{Fucking}N...

Democrats vomiting again.

 

[Rye Catcher]

If McConnell was smart he’d ensure a fair and comprehensive trial be conducted.

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet. High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes, the former suggests a felony and the latter less than a felony but more than an infraction.

You and others who hate Democrats and excuse trump are grasping at straws in the wind.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet.

And it happens to be true.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes

So charge him criminally.

Impeachment is no different than an indictment, using semantic sophistry doesn't make your case.

 

[westwall]

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet. High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes, the former suggests a felony and the latter less than a felony but more than an infraction.

You and others who hate Democrats and excuse trump are grasping at straws in the wind.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet.

And it happens to be true.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes

So charge him criminally.

Impeachment is no different than an indictment, using semantic sophistry doesn't make your case.

Says the king of semantic sophistry.

 

[Indeependent]

First we have this:

Mitch McConnell hit with formal ethics complaint over Trump impeachment: Statements ‘directly contradict his oath of impartiality’

The advocacy group Public Citizen on Monday filed a formal ethics complaint against Senate Majority Mitch McConnell, accusing the powerful Republican of betraying his oath of office by signaling overt bias in favor of President Donald Trump even before his looming impeachment trial begins.

And then:

McConnell afraid GOP doesn’t have enough votes to dismiss impeachment charges against Trump

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was once confident he could get rid of the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump. As more information becomes available, however, that doesn’t appear to be the case.

A CNN report explained Monday that despite Trump’s urging, forcing senators to vote against a fair trial would put Republicans up for reelection in danger of losing their seats.

Turtle McConnel is circling the drain and seems to be headed for a legacy as the worst and most partisan majority leader in the history of the Senate

Funny??

CN{Fucking}N...

Democrats vomiting again.

Were things so great under GW after the crash?
Neither party has any validity in my eyes.
Trump is nuts but he is executing his stated platform.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why? The House did nothing of the sort and they still couldn't come up with a crime.

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems that you don’t understand much about impeachment

Impeachment in the House is a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

Acquittal in the Senate will be a political, not a criminal, proceeding.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet. High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes, the former suggests a felony and the latter less than a felony but more than an infraction.

You and others who hate Democrats and excuse trump are grasping at straws in the wind.

That's the meme being echoed around the Internet.

And it happens to be true.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors are crimes

So charge him criminally.

Impeachment is no different than an indictment, using semantic sophistry doesn't make your case.

And he'll be acquitted and he won't be criminally charged.