None of them will win. I know who will, though, and he hasn't entered yet.
I'm inclined to agree but only with the last four (4, libs) words.
But for your part in the thing, are you certain George Soros is legally qualified, Obama rules aside?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
None of them will win. I know who will, though, and he hasn't entered yet.
Bush and Christie can run evenly.
A person who was a birfer and believer that Obama is a Muslim might believe that.Bush and Christie can run evenly.
You have a point.
But which would run as a Democrat and which as a Republican?
They ARE interchangeable......
John Kasich....
That's who I want to run...
None of them will win. I know who will, though, and he hasn't entered yet.
John Kasich....
That's who I want to run...
He's way too boring. It's like running white bread as your candidate. Another old white guy with policies that favor old white guys...again.
Perhaps so, but he does not have the campaign organization or the donors that he needs.John Kasich....
That's who I want to run...
He's way too boring. It's like running white bread as your candidate. Another old white guy with policies that favor old white guys...again.
He's BY FAR the most qualified. Plus, he's very likable.
Perhaps so, but he does not have the campaign organization or the donors that he needs.John Kasich....
That's who I want to run...
He's way too boring. It's like running white bread as your candidate. Another old white guy with policies that favor old white guys...again.
He's BY FAR the most qualified. Plus, he's very likable.
Only to those who think Obama is actually a Kenyan or a Muslim.
I voted for Reagan twice - are you EVER going to get tired of making up shit about people and then arguing with what you made up.
It really makes you look silly.
Valid argumentRepublicans pushed it and billy caved (finally) wanting to be popular. He saw what people wanted and went with it, to his credit. The current occupant is much more of a liberal, being arrogant and condescending he doesn't care what America wants, he knows best.Guys - you are basing "Reagan was VERY conservative" on what the far left said about him. That how they attacked him and tried to run against him.
I have posted the documentation of WHAT HE DID AS PRESIDENT. There is no question his administration was a moderate one. I lived the history - I don't HAVE to re-write it.
But if you'd rather base your opinion on what opponents said about him - rather than what he actually did as POTUS - knock yourself out.
Pretty funny that no matter what the record says, you just can't let go. This pathological need to desperately cling to an illusion.
Have fun with that.
Well Reagan sure did spend a lot.
I haven't seen a Republican or Democrat who has not during my lifetime.
Clinton got to a balanced budget, then gave it to that bush guy. We see how that worked out.
You won't get any argument from me that Clinton was better than current guy....
Wwhens the last time a moderate (lib speak for pansy ass stand for nothing) con won the POTUS?
Clinton had it easy.Valid argumentRepublicans pushed it and billy caved (finally) wanting to be popular. He saw what people wanted and went with it, to his credit. The current occupant is much more of a liberal, being arrogant and condescending he doesn't care what America wants, he knows best.Well Reagan sure did spend a lot.
I haven't seen a Republican or Democrat who has not during my lifetime.
Clinton got to a balanced budget, then gave it to that bush guy. We see how that worked out.
You won't get any argument from me that Clinton was better than current guy....
The economy boomed under Clinton, budget surplus, relative peace
What you can't argue is that either Bush was better than Clinton or Obama