Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yep.
Common mistake.
Admit it.. you guys didn't read the article, did you..
It has been posted several times as Republican revisionist history. It was wrong before, it is wrong now. The south was solid Democrat. It does not mean that Southern Republicans somehow supported the rights of blacks
There is no evidence that Martin Luther King Jr was a Republican. there is evidence that his father Dr Martin Luther King was a lifelong Republican
If it helps, part of his "I Have a Dream" speech was a lot like Carey's in the the 1952 Republican National Convention.
Admit it.. you guys didn't read the article, did you..
It has been posted several times as Republican revisionist history. It was wrong before, it is wrong now. The south was solid Democrat. It does not mean that Southern Republicans somehow supported the rights of blacks
There is no evidence that Martin Luther King Jr was a Republican. there is evidence that his father Dr Martin Luther King was a lifelong Republican
there were 10 count them 10 southern reps in the house and 1 in the senate.
I hear it is much bigger then the Lincoln memorial, gee I wonder how big the Obama shrine will be?
Did they pay the King family for the licensing of his image?
It has been posted several times as Republican revisionist history. It was wrong before, it is wrong now. The south was solid Democrat. It does not mean that Southern Republicans somehow supported the rights of blacks
There is no evidence that Martin Luther King Jr was a Republican. there is evidence that his father Dr Martin Luther King was a lifelong Republican
there were 10 count them 10 southern reps in the house and 1 in the senate.
Hence the solid south. There were Republicans in the south. They ran in every election but tended not to win.
Those Republicans were as racist as their Democratic brethren. The fact is that you could not get elected dog catcher if you were against segregation and supported Civil Rights
That is why the recent propaganda that it was the Democrats who were the racists is so deceptive. Civil Rights was a North/South issue not a Democrat/Republican issue.
Those Republicans were as racist as their Democratic brethren. The fact is that you could not get elected dog catcher if you were against segregation and supported Civil Rights
Did they pay the King family for the licensing of his image?
sorry to have to quote you again but, apparently yes-$800K..
Cashing in on Martin Luther King Jr. - latimes.com
there were 10 count them 10 southern reps in the house and 1 in the senate.
Hence the solid south. There were Republicans in the south. They ran in every election but tended not to win.
Those Republicans were as racist as their Democratic brethren. The fact is that you could not get elected dog catcher if you were against segregation and supported Civil Rights
That is why the recent propaganda that it was the Democrats who were the racists is so deceptive. Civil Rights was a North/South issue not a Democrat/Republican issue.
Those Republicans were as racist as their Democratic brethren. The fact is that you could not get elected dog catcher if you were against segregation and supported Civil Rights
go ahead and contradict yourself some more, I don't think you went far enough here
Did they pay the King family for the licensing of his image?
sorry to have to quote you again but, apparently yes-$800K..
Cashing in on Martin Luther King Jr. - latimes.com
it looks like eddie murphy
Did they pay the King family for the licensing of his image?
sorry to have to quote you again but, apparently yes-$800K..
Cashing in on Martin Luther King Jr. - latimes.com
The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. often spoke of public charity and how every person "must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness." It is a lesson that appears lost on his own children.
The King family has long been criticized for insisting on payment for the use of their father's name, image, speeches and virtually anything that they can claim for themselves or their foundation. The family reached a new low this week when it was revealed that they had been paid more than $800,000 by the Martin Luther King Jr. National Memorial Project Foundation for the use of King's image and words on the planned King memorial on Washington's
For many years, the family has insisted that although King may have been called the nation's prophet, he is their property. Of course, it is the profits, and not the prophet himself, that has led them regularly to court to fight over royalties and control.
The surviving children of King have been feuding in court since July...