Media Surprised That Christians Schools Are . . . Christian

[Andylusion]

And you are a Puritanical Moralist Zealot. Make no mistake about it--and a cowardly unthinking one, being swept away by the Orthodoxy of your time.

Congrats on that.

"And you are a Puritanical Moralist Zealot. Make no mistake about it--and a cowardly unthinking one, being swept away by the Orthodoxy of your time."


really?

insults and personal attacks?

is that a right wing evangelical zealot thing?

cowardly?

seriously?

you HAD to go there?

look SOURsue, your post is merely angry irrational personal attacks, completely unfounded.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

or, if you prefer...lies!


and that is why you voted for trump!


you like liars!

I am a secular aheist/humanist who does not want ANY religious zealots of any religion teaching American children to hate America or other Americans.

If you do NOT agree then YOU are the zealot.


Tell me, cowardly liar....

if all public schools and all private schools were christian orthodox, teaching all American children that girls should submit, gays should be killed and atheists should NOT be allowed rights would you be happy?

Allow me to add "hypocrite" and "sanctimonious" to Sue's description of you.

"People who think in the dark ages."

". . . enslaving women"

". . . performing the final solution on all of your christian enemies"

". . . inquisition"

And you want to get your panties ruffled over someone ELSE making "angry irrational attacks"? Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives.

"Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives."

Nonsense.

You are deranged.

You are obviously a deranged christofascist zealot.

I oppose ALL religious extremists regardless of which religion it is.

NOT wanting any religious zealots to enforce their religious beliefs on everyone doesn't make me a zealot.

It makes me rational.

Assuming that anyone who opposes religious extremism is "hate filled intolerant" is what a loony toon chrisitian wackjob..

You stinking christian conservatives mock and ridicule and attack and lie and cheat and when called out on your EVIL BEHAVIOR you immediately whine "i'm under attack!!"

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

So I will ask again, christian wackjob, If michelle Obama was an art teacher for an EXTREMIST ISLAMIC school would you have been kind to her about that?

Well obviously being a Christian, I would be more supportive of a Christian in office. That's basic logic 101.

Would I have been kind to her about it? I don't know if I would have cared, unless she did something to instigate me caring. I have no idea what that would have been.... but in general when non-elected people, start acting like they were elected... that usually causes a negative result.

When Hillary was first lady in the 90s, she started prancing around and acting like she was important, and we didn't like that then.
When Michelle did the same, we didn't like that.

One of the reasons I like Melania is because she's kind of just doing her thing, without trying to be some sort of official. Just like Barbra and Laura.

So if Michelle acted the same, and was teaching art, I can't see any reason I would care.

That would question Obama on being Muslim obviously. And if he actually ran as a Muslim, then I would question it either. Of course he would never have been elected, but that isn't what you asked is it?

A bigger question would be, would you be ok with Michelle working for an extremist Islamic school? Remember, she's a Democrat. You should care more about what she does, than we do. We're not likely to vote for a left-wing socialist, no matter what she does in her spare time.

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

But I'm not Jewish....

 

[Cecilie1200]

And you are a Puritanical Moralist Zealot. Make no mistake about it--and a cowardly unthinking one, being swept away by the Orthodoxy of your time.

Congrats on that.

"And you are a Puritanical Moralist Zealot. Make no mistake about it--and a cowardly unthinking one, being swept away by the Orthodoxy of your time."


really?

insults and personal attacks?

is that a right wing evangelical zealot thing?

cowardly?

seriously?

you HAD to go there?

look SOURsue, your post is merely angry irrational personal attacks, completely unfounded.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

or, if you prefer...lies!


and that is why you voted for trump!


you like liars!

I am a secular aheist/humanist who does not want ANY religious zealots of any religion teaching American children to hate America or other Americans.

If you do NOT agree then YOU are the zealot.


Tell me, cowardly liar....

if all public schools and all private schools were christian orthodox, teaching all American children that girls should submit, gays should be killed and atheists should NOT be allowed rights would you be happy?

Allow me to add "hypocrite" and "sanctimonious" to Sue's description of you.

"People who think in the dark ages."

". . . enslaving women"

". . . performing the final solution on all of your christian enemies"

". . . inquisition"

And you want to get your panties ruffled over someone ELSE making "angry irrational attacks"? Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives.

"Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives."

Nonsense.

You are deranged.

You are obviously a deranged christofascist zealot.

I oppose ALL religious extremists regardless of which religion it is.

NOT wanting any religious zealots to enforce their religious beliefs on everyone doesn't make me a zealot.

It makes me rational.

Assuming that anyone who opposes religious extremism is "hate filled intolerant" is what a loony toon chrisitian wackjob..

You stinking christian conservatives mock and ridicule and attack and lie and cheat and when called out on your EVIL BEHAVIOR you immediately whine "i'm under attack!!"

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

So I will ask again, christian wackjob, If michelle Obama was an art teacher for an EXTREMIST ISLAMIC school would you have been kind to her about that?

Well obviously being a Christian, I would be more supportive of a Christian in office. That's basic logic 101.

Would I have been kind to her about it? I don't know if I would have cared, unless she did something to instigate me caring. I have no idea what that would have been.... but in general when non-elected people, start acting like they were elected... that usually causes a negative result.

When Hillary was first lady in the 90s, she started prancing around and acting like she was important, and we didn't like that then.
When Michelle did the same, we didn't like that.

One of the reasons I like Melania is because she's kind of just doing her thing, without trying to be some sort of official. Just like Barbra and Laura.

So if Michelle acted the same, and was teaching art, I can't see any reason I would care.

That would question Obama on being Muslim obviously. And if he actually ran as a Muslim, then I would question it either. Of course he would never have been elected, but that isn't what you asked is it?

A bigger question would be, would you be ok with Michelle working for an extremist Islamic school? Remember, she's a Democrat. You should care more about what she does, than we do. We're not likely to vote for a left-wing socialist, no matter what she does in her spare time.

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

 

[Avatar4321]

I'm sorry but it is the Christians or at least trying to pretend they are Christian. It isn't what they say but how they act. And they are acting like they have never read the bible. Yes there is no question in my mind that many Christians do believe that any sign of gayism is a road straight to hell. To bad they can't understand what the bible says. Look at the way they back the mistreatment of people that are in need of help. Do any of you supposed Christians know what the bible says about that. Remember that Christ was a refugee.

Good job. You have the lefty talking points down.

Maybe you could try for accuracy of reality instead of talking points though

 

[Avatar4321]

So this was the outrage du jour for my sister, the family's token leftist:

Karen Pence Works at School That Bans Gay Employees and Students

Apparently, this is a big, shocking story worthy of much coverage:

Karen Pence to teach at school that bans LGBTQ employees, students

Karen Pence Is Working At A School That Bans LGBTQ Employees And Kids | HuffPost

The school that hired Karen Pence requires applicants to disavow gay marriage, trans identity

Why this is such a bombshell is anyone's guess. To quote Matt Walsh, the media seems to "discover" that the Pences are Christians every two months or so, and they're shocked and outraged every time.

I'm not entirely certain what the problem is here. Obviously, given that they all basically used the same headline, they're up in arms yet again about Christians stubbornly insisting that "alternative" sexual behavior is not okay, in direct contradiction to the CLEAR dictates of the left. I'm just not sure if they're demanding that Christian private schools should endorse behavior they don't agree with, or if they're demanding that the Vice President's wife should have to get a job in a place she doesn't agree with.

Wrong.

No one is surprised by the unwanted fear, bigotry, and hate common to far too many Christian schools, including the media.

Except there is no unwanted fear bigotry or hate involved

 

[Lysistrata]

"And you are a Puritanical Moralist Zealot. Make no mistake about it--and a cowardly unthinking one, being swept away by the Orthodoxy of your time."


really?

insults and personal attacks?

is that a right wing evangelical zealot thing?

cowardly?

seriously?

you HAD to go there?

look SOURsue, your post is merely angry irrational personal attacks, completely unfounded.
or, if you prefer...lies!


and that is why you voted for trump!


you like liars!

I am a secular aheist/humanist who does not want ANY religious zealots of any religion teaching American children to hate America or other Americans.

If you do NOT agree then YOU are the zealot.


Tell me, cowardly liar....

if all public schools and all private schools were christian orthodox, teaching all American children that girls should submit, gays should be killed and atheists should NOT be allowed rights would you be happy?

Allow me to add "hypocrite" and "sanctimonious" to Sue's description of you.

"People who think in the dark ages."

". . . enslaving women"

". . . performing the final solution on all of your christian enemies"

". . . inquisition"

And you want to get your panties ruffled over someone ELSE making "angry irrational attacks"? Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives.

"Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives."

Nonsense.

You are deranged.

You are obviously a deranged christofascist zealot.

I oppose ALL religious extremists regardless of which religion it is.

NOT wanting any religious zealots to enforce their religious beliefs on everyone doesn't make me a zealot.

It makes me rational.

Assuming that anyone who opposes religious extremism is "hate filled intolerant" is what a loony toon chrisitian wackjob..

You stinking christian conservatives mock and ridicule and attack and lie and cheat and when called out on your EVIL BEHAVIOR you immediately whine "i'm under attack!!"

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

So I will ask again, christian wackjob, If michelle Obama was an art teacher for an EXTREMIST ISLAMIC school would you have been kind to her about that?

Well obviously being a Christian, I would be more supportive of a Christian in office. That's basic logic 101.

Would I have been kind to her about it? I don't know if I would have cared, unless she did something to instigate me caring. I have no idea what that would have been.... but in general when non-elected people, start acting like they were elected... that usually causes a negative result.

When Hillary was first lady in the 90s, she started prancing around and acting like she was important, and we didn't like that then.
When Michelle did the same, we didn't like that.

One of the reasons I like Melania is because she's kind of just doing her thing, without trying to be some sort of official. Just like Barbra and Laura.

So if Michelle acted the same, and was teaching art, I can't see any reason I would care.

That would question Obama on being Muslim obviously. And if he actually ran as a Muslim, then I would question it either. Of course he would never have been elected, but that isn't what you asked is it?

A bigger question would be, would you be ok with Michelle working for an extremist Islamic school? Remember, she's a Democrat. You should care more about what she does, than we do. We're not likely to vote for a left-wing socialist, no matter what she does in her spare time.

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

 

[BreezeWood]

So this was the outrage du jour for my sister, the family's token leftist:

Karen Pence Works at School That Bans Gay Employees and Students

Apparently, this is a big, shocking story worthy of much coverage:

Karen Pence to teach at school that bans LGBTQ employees, students

Karen Pence Is Working At A School That Bans LGBTQ Employees And Kids | HuffPost

The school that hired Karen Pence requires applicants to disavow gay marriage, trans identity

Why this is such a bombshell is anyone's guess. To quote Matt Walsh, the media seems to "discover" that the Pences are Christians every two months or so, and they're shocked and outraged every time.

I'm not entirely certain what the problem is here. Obviously, given that they all basically used the same headline, they're up in arms yet again about Christians stubbornly insisting that "alternative" sexual behavior is not okay, in direct contradiction to the CLEAR dictates of the left. I'm just not sure if they're demanding that Christian private schools should endorse behavior they don't agree with, or if they're demanding that the Vice President's wife should have to get a job in a place she doesn't agree with.

Wrong.

No one is surprised by the unwanted fear, bigotry, and hate common to far too many Christian schools, including the media.

Except there is no unwanted fear bigotry or hate involved

.

Except there is no unwanted fear bigotry or hate involved

except in fact the opposite is the truth - uninterrupted throughout history.

can you provide a period in history christianity was not at the forefront of persecution and victimization of the innocent - what is your example through history from the 4th century to present day that is an image of your accomplishment ... for instance the bible belt in this country just in the last century what other than hatred, bigotry and slavery were they known to have accomplished.

 

[Lysistrata]

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

Seriousy, what is the point of your religion?

 

[cnm]

Media Surprised That Christians Schools Are . . . Christian

Quite understandable. Looking at the product one wouldn't know unless one was told.

 

[Disir]

what payback have the innocent's above, witches done to you.

have you exhausted your research ... what were their crimes that so upset you were they sexually oriented ...

Yes and depending on the location it was primarily over property. However, with the Zauberejackl witch trials it was an easy way to get rid of the homeless kids.

.

Yes and depending on the location it was primarily over property. However, with the Zauberejackl witch trials it was an easy way to get rid of the homeless kids.

^ if you were honest you would not include the occurrences in Europe as they stretch back throughout their recorded history of various iterations though the use of religion was the primary means to accomplish their ends.

Religious Aspects

The Puritan lifestyle was influenced heavily by the church and Christian beliefs. According to Discovery Education, “Church was the cornerstone of the mainly Puritan society of the 17th century.”

For example, one of the first accused women, Sara Osburn, had been previously scandalized by the community for having premarital sexual relations and not regularly attending church, whereas another woman, Martha Corey, was shunned for having an illegitimate child (Phelps and Lehman). The fact that these women were considered sinners played a huge role in their accusation and conviction. The
specifically women and children, would be selected to carry out his work. Witches were believed to do just this, and therefore were deemed punishable under Puritan Law (“Salem Witch Trials”). The accused women mentioned above had failed to uphold the community values, and were therefore easy targets for the Devil and witchcraft. This argument played a huge role in their conviction by the court. As opposed to having actual evidence, these women were condemned to hanging based solely on the testimonies of several teenage girls and their own positions in society.
...............
The accused were prosecuted and executed for allegedly practicing witchcraft, when little to no evidence of it existed. Many consider these trials one of the most tragic series of events in the history of the United States as well as in the history of the Christian faith.


the christian bible is replete with avenues through its text to persecute and victimize the innocent as the ulterior motive for its composition in the 4th century and has been used for that purpose since that time - there has never been a period in history those parishioners have ever been remorseful to the extent to alter their book appropriately but rather conspire between episodes to again inflict the same suffering as recorded through history, uninterrupted.

Media Surprised That Christians Schools Are . . . Christian

it is a matter of being disheartening - those same awful people perpetrating their crimes unimpeded.

I'm all about honesty.

And you didn't mention that the property that the majority of the women owned was immediately confiscated when they were accused. There is nothing to be dishonest about. And Christology wasn't fully developed for another 3 centuries after it's "composition".

You started down this little path a few pages ago with needing apologies and then dropped a link of the Catholic Covington school apologizing before they had completed their investigation as if you were trying to make a point. You were wrong but that wasn't what was important. You got an apology while continuing to demand an apology indicating that apologies aren't really what you are after. As opposed to having actual evidence, these children were condemned to death based solely on the testimonies of an edited clip and Twitter and their MAGA hats.

We don't call them witch hunts for nothing. As long as you can feel holy and pure about what your doing, that's ok, amiright?

 

[ding]

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

Seriousy, what is the point of your religion?

How to live life and how not to live life.

 

[Lysistrata]

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

Seriousy, what is the point of your religion?

How to live life and how not to live life.

So you claim that your religion tells people how to live their lives and how not to? Good grief!

BTW: which guys are in charge of your religion?

 

[ding]

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

Seriousy, what is the point of your religion?

How to live life and how not to live life.

So you claim that your religion tells people how to live their lives and how not to? Good grief!

BTW: which guys are in charge of your religion?

Don’t over dramatize it. The universe is constantly giving us feedback on our behaviors.

Religion has no enforcement. It’s an honor system.

Enforcement comes from experiencing the consequences of our actions and decisions.

 

[Andylusion]

Please specify that the "Christians" discussed on this thread are only some sects of the Christian faith. There are other Christians who do not hold these views. Christians have split. Christians have a history of splitting.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

Seriousy, what is the point of your religion?

Seriously? Christianity believes that the universe did not pop into existence. Christianity teaches that humans are made in the image of G-d, but rejected the G-d that created them. We believe that G-d came to earth in the form of a man, in order to redeem, or save from punishment, the human race. That all people can be forgiven of their rejection of G-d, by believing and accepting Jesus as their Lord and Savior.

Christianity teaches that there will come a day of judgement. That G-d will judge the entire world, both good and bad. That injustice will be addressed. That evil will be punished, and that all people will face the consequences of their actions, both good and bad.

Lastly, we believe that this world and universe will be re-created, in perfection, where evil does not exist, where there is no disease, or pain, or suffering. Where people will love each other, and G-d for all eternity.

However, this gift of salvation and heaven, is open for all, but not all will accept it. What happens to those who refuse, will be that they will get what they want. Which is to be separated from G-d. This separation is what we call hell. All those who refuse G-d, will be granted their desire to be apart from him.

The point of Christianity is to save as many people from this hell, and have as many people as is possible, be with us in Heaven, to have joy for all eternity.

That is the point.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Allow me to add "hypocrite" and "sanctimonious" to Sue's description of you.

"People who think in the dark ages."

". . . enslaving women"

". . . performing the final solution on all of your christian enemies"

". . . inquisition"

And you want to get your panties ruffled over someone ELSE making "angry irrational attacks"? Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives.

"Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives."

Nonsense.

You are deranged.

You are obviously a deranged christofascist zealot.

I oppose ALL religious extremists regardless of which religion it is.

NOT wanting any religious zealots to enforce their religious beliefs on everyone doesn't make me a zealot.

It makes me rational.

Assuming that anyone who opposes religious extremism is "hate filled intolerant" is what a loony toon chrisitian wackjob..

You stinking christian conservatives mock and ridicule and attack and lie and cheat and when called out on your EVIL BEHAVIOR you immediately whine "i'm under attack!!"

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

So I will ask again, christian wackjob, If michelle Obama was an art teacher for an EXTREMIST ISLAMIC school would you have been kind to her about that?

Well obviously being a Christian, I would be more supportive of a Christian in office. That's basic logic 101.

Would I have been kind to her about it? I don't know if I would have cared, unless she did something to instigate me caring. I have no idea what that would have been.... but in general when non-elected people, start acting like they were elected... that usually causes a negative result.

When Hillary was first lady in the 90s, she started prancing around and acting like she was important, and we didn't like that then.
When Michelle did the same, we didn't like that.

One of the reasons I like Melania is because she's kind of just doing her thing, without trying to be some sort of official. Just like Barbra and Laura.

So if Michelle acted the same, and was teaching art, I can't see any reason I would care.

That would question Obama on being Muslim obviously. And if he actually ran as a Muslim, then I would question it either. Of course he would never have been elected, but that isn't what you asked is it?

A bigger question would be, would you be ok with Michelle working for an extremist Islamic school? Remember, she's a Democrat. You should care more about what she does, than we do. We're not likely to vote for a left-wing socialist, no matter what she does in her spare time.

Nope. I can't speak for anyone else, but if I'm talking about what Christianity teaches, I'm talking about standard, bedrock doctrine that is in the Bible and has been accepted across denominations for centuries, not about internal doctrinal differences that mean nothing to anyone outside the Church (except as a point of glee because "Christians are divided!").

For example, I can state that Christianity teaches the doctrinal validity of baptism, and that requires no specific breakdown because, to my knowledge, there are no Christian denominations which do not include baptism. I would, however, need to become more specific if I were talking about HOW baptism should be performed.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

Yes, the fact that I scorn and mock you and reject any claim you make to any sort of moral authority MUST be about fandom of some bunch of televangelists you, in your deep and profound ignorance of all things religious, have determined are representative of all Christianity.

It couldn't possibly just be because I'm a human being, and like all human beings, I shun you as the piece of garbage that you are.

You really don't have to work this hard at figuring out why I look down on you, Lice. Just grab a mirror.

 

[Lysistrata]

"Your entire post was nothing but a hyperbolic mess of baseless hatred. As much as you want to think of your position as rational and enlightened, you exude more nasty, hate-filled intolerance in one sentence than any of the Christians you so revile and long to eradicate do in their entire lives."

Nonsense.

You are deranged.

You are obviously a deranged christofascist zealot.

I oppose ALL religious extremists regardless of which religion it is.

NOT wanting any religious zealots to enforce their religious beliefs on everyone doesn't make me a zealot.

It makes me rational.

Assuming that anyone who opposes religious extremism is "hate filled intolerant" is what a loony toon chrisitian wackjob..

You stinking christian conservatives mock and ridicule and attack and lie and cheat and when called out on your EVIL BEHAVIOR you immediately whine "i'm under attack!!"

So I will ask again, christian wackjob, If michelle Obama was an art teacher for an EXTREMIST ISLAMIC school would you have been kind to her about that?

Well obviously being a Christian, I would be more supportive of a Christian in office. That's basic logic 101.

Would I have been kind to her about it? I don't know if I would have cared, unless she did something to instigate me caring. I have no idea what that would have been.... but in general when non-elected people, start acting like they were elected... that usually causes a negative result.

When Hillary was first lady in the 90s, she started prancing around and acting like she was important, and we didn't like that then.
When Michelle did the same, we didn't like that.

One of the reasons I like Melania is because she's kind of just doing her thing, without trying to be some sort of official. Just like Barbra and Laura.

So if Michelle acted the same, and was teaching art, I can't see any reason I would care.

That would question Obama on being Muslim obviously. And if he actually ran as a Muslim, then I would question it either. Of course he would never have been elected, but that isn't what you asked is it?

A bigger question would be, would you be ok with Michelle working for an extremist Islamic school? Remember, she's a Democrat. You should care more about what she does, than we do. We're not likely to vote for a left-wing socialist, no matter what she does in her spare time.

blah blah blah. The only thing that we have to go on is the words of Jesus as given in the Sermon on the Mount and his acts on earth. Christianity is based only that these things.Christianity has to be reconstructed to get rid of all of the stuff in the "Old Testament," and crap like paul, timothy, and the stoned moron who wrote Revelation. If you want to follow Leviticus and Deuteronomy, good luck with your ritual baths, being "unclean" depending on the sex of the baby you have given birth to, your animal sacrifices, etc.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

Yes, the fact that I scorn and mock you and reject any claim you make to any sort of moral authority MUST be about fandom of some bunch of televangelists you, in your deep and profound ignorance of all things religious, have determined are representative of all Christianity.

It couldn't possibly just be because I'm a human being, and like all human beings, I shun you as the piece of garbage that you are.

You really don't have to work this hard at figuring out why I look down on you, Lice. Just grab a mirror.

You sound like you are a member of one of those junk cults. Southern Baptist maybe?
You obviously have not read Leviticus or Deuteronomy. You are hilarious.

 

[BreezeWood]

what payback have the innocent's above, witches done to you.

have you exhausted your research ... what were their crimes that so upset you were they sexually oriented ...

Yes and depending on the location it was primarily over property. However, with the Zauberejackl witch trials it was an easy way to get rid of the homeless kids.

.

Yes and depending on the location it was primarily over property. However, with the Zauberejackl witch trials it was an easy way to get rid of the homeless kids.

^ if you were honest you would not include the occurrences in Europe as they stretch back throughout their recorded history of various iterations though the use of religion was the primary means to accomplish their ends.

Religious Aspects

The Puritan lifestyle was influenced heavily by the church and Christian beliefs. According to Discovery Education, “Church was the cornerstone of the mainly Puritan society of the 17th century.”

For example, one of the first accused women, Sara Osburn, had been previously scandalized by the community for having premarital sexual relations and not regularly attending church, whereas another woman, Martha Corey, was shunned for having an illegitimate child (Phelps and Lehman). The fact that these women were considered sinners played a huge role in their accusation and conviction. The
specifically women and children, would be selected to carry out his work. Witches were believed to do just this, and therefore were deemed punishable under Puritan Law (“Salem Witch Trials”). The accused women mentioned above had failed to uphold the community values, and were therefore easy targets for the Devil and witchcraft. This argument played a huge role in their conviction by the court. As opposed to having actual evidence, these women were condemned to hanging based solely on the testimonies of several teenage girls and their own positions in society.
...............
The accused were prosecuted and executed for allegedly practicing witchcraft, when little to no evidence of it existed. Many consider these trials one of the most tragic series of events in the history of the United States as well as in the history of the Christian faith.


the christian bible is replete with avenues through its text to persecute and victimize the innocent as the ulterior motive for its composition in the 4th century and has been used for that purpose since that time - there has never been a period in history those parishioners have ever been remorseful to the extent to alter their book appropriately but rather conspire between episodes to again inflict the same suffering as recorded through history, uninterrupted.

Media Surprised That Christians Schools Are . . . Christian

it is a matter of being disheartening - those same awful people perpetrating their crimes unimpeded.

I'm all about honesty.

And you didn't mention that the property that the majority of the women owned was immediately confiscated when they were accused. There is nothing to be dishonest about. And Christology wasn't fully developed for another 3 centuries after it's "composition".

You started down this little path a few pages ago with needing apologies and then dropped a link of the Catholic Covington school apologizing before they had completed their investigation as if you were trying to make a point. You were wrong but that wasn't what was important. You got an apology while continuing to demand an apology indicating that apologies aren't really what you are after. As opposed to having actual evidence, these children were condemned to death based solely on the testimonies of an edited clip and Twitter and their MAGA hats.

We don't call them witch hunts for nothing. As long as you can feel holy and pure about what your doing, that's ok, amiright?

.

I'm all about honesty.

And you didn't mention that the property that the majority of the women owned was immediately confiscated when they were accused.

no, your european inclusion was your doing, was that somehow related to salem 200 years latter - your entire poat is threaded with dishonesty ... christian.

You started down this little path a few pages ago with needing apologies and then dropped a link of the Catholic Covington school apologizing before they had completed their investigation as if you were trying to make a point.

a timely example of a christian academy ... time will play out the truth.

your dishonesty is matched by your duplicity ... the church did apologies, they knew in the beginning the errors made whether sugarcoated later or not.

these children were condemned to death based solely on the testimonies of an edited clip and Twitter and their MAGA hats.

you are a joke (condemned to death) - these children [sic] were chanting slurs they were no different than the black religionist it was the native americans that said nothing at all.

We don't call them witch hunts for nothing.

have you heard of sigmund freud, * you could use his help ...

 

[Cecilie1200]

Well obviously being a Christian, I would be more supportive of a Christian in office. That's basic logic 101.

Would I have been kind to her about it? I don't know if I would have cared, unless she did something to instigate me caring. I have no idea what that would have been.... but in general when non-elected people, start acting like they were elected... that usually causes a negative result.

When Hillary was first lady in the 90s, she started prancing around and acting like she was important, and we didn't like that then.
When Michelle did the same, we didn't like that.

One of the reasons I like Melania is because she's kind of just doing her thing, without trying to be some sort of official. Just like Barbra and Laura.

So if Michelle acted the same, and was teaching art, I can't see any reason I would care.

That would question Obama on being Muslim obviously. And if he actually ran as a Muslim, then I would question it either. Of course he would never have been elected, but that isn't what you asked is it?

A bigger question would be, would you be ok with Michelle working for an extremist Islamic school? Remember, she's a Democrat. You should care more about what she does, than we do. We're not likely to vote for a left-wing socialist, no matter what she does in her spare time.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

Yes, the fact that I scorn and mock you and reject any claim you make to any sort of moral authority MUST be about fandom of some bunch of televangelists you, in your deep and profound ignorance of all things religious, have determined are representative of all Christianity.

It couldn't possibly just be because I'm a human being, and like all human beings, I shun you as the piece of garbage that you are.

You really don't have to work this hard at figuring out why I look down on you, Lice. Just grab a mirror.

You sound like you are a member of one of those junk cults. Southern Baptist maybe?
You obviously have not read Leviticus or Deuteronomy. You are hilarious.

You sound like you can't wrap your brain around not having any moral authority.

I won't be defending and justifying my beliefs to you at any point in time. If you ask very nicely and humbly, I might deign to explain to you how you can stop being a bitter loser who has to spew hatred all over people with successful lives, but until then, I will just continue to pity you.

 

[Lysistrata]

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

Yes, the fact that I scorn and mock you and reject any claim you make to any sort of moral authority MUST be about fandom of some bunch of televangelists you, in your deep and profound ignorance of all things religious, have determined are representative of all Christianity.

It couldn't possibly just be because I'm a human being, and like all human beings, I shun you as the piece of garbage that you are.

You really don't have to work this hard at figuring out why I look down on you, Lice. Just grab a mirror.

You sound like you are a member of one of those junk cults. Southern Baptist maybe?
You obviously have not read Leviticus or Deuteronomy. You are hilarious.

You sound like you can't wrap your brain around not having any moral authority.

I won't be defending and justifying my beliefs to you at any point in time. If you ask very nicely and humbly, I might deign to explain to you how you can stop being a bitter loser who has to spew hatred all over people with successful lives, but until then, I will just continue to pity you.

"Moral authority"? What human has this?
You have no reason to assume that you are successful and I am not.
What would a fundie cow have to explain? Someone like you who has tried her damnest to destroy a great religion.

 

[Moonglow]

Well obviously being a Christian, I would be more supportive of a Christian in office. That's basic logic 101.

Would I have been kind to her about it? I don't know if I would have cared, unless she did something to instigate me caring. I have no idea what that would have been.... but in general when non-elected people, start acting like they were elected... that usually causes a negative result.

When Hillary was first lady in the 90s, she started prancing around and acting like she was important, and we didn't like that then.
When Michelle did the same, we didn't like that.

One of the reasons I like Melania is because she's kind of just doing her thing, without trying to be some sort of official. Just like Barbra and Laura.

So if Michelle acted the same, and was teaching art, I can't see any reason I would care.

That would question Obama on being Muslim obviously. And if he actually ran as a Muslim, then I would question it either. Of course he would never have been elected, but that isn't what you asked is it?

A bigger question would be, would you be ok with Michelle working for an extremist Islamic school? Remember, she's a Democrat. You should care more about what she does, than we do. We're not likely to vote for a left-wing socialist, no matter what she does in her spare time.

"Blah blah blah I will never hear anything but what I want to hear, and who cares if it makes any sense?!"

So much for talking to you like a person. I will now revert to talking to you like Lice: No one has asked, or will ever ask, you how to live, because there is literally not one thing about you that anyone wants. The more you disapprove, the more right it must be.

It's a good thing God loves everyone no matter what, because for damned sure that's the only way you could have any value at all.

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

Yes, the fact that I scorn and mock you and reject any claim you make to any sort of moral authority MUST be about fandom of some bunch of televangelists you, in your deep and profound ignorance of all things religious, have determined are representative of all Christianity.

It couldn't possibly just be because I'm a human being, and like all human beings, I shun you as the piece of garbage that you are.

You really don't have to work this hard at figuring out why I look down on you, Lice. Just grab a mirror.

You sound like you are a member of one of those junk cults. Southern Baptist maybe?
You obviously have not read Leviticus or Deuteronomy. You are hilarious.

There are different levels of Baptist. The one I was raised in was mild like Methodist. Then there was the ones preaching on street corners and telling all about the fire and brimstone that awaits all those who do not subscribe..

 

[Lysistrata]

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

Yes, the fact that I scorn and mock you and reject any claim you make to any sort of moral authority MUST be about fandom of some bunch of televangelists you, in your deep and profound ignorance of all things religious, have determined are representative of all Christianity.

It couldn't possibly just be because I'm a human being, and like all human beings, I shun you as the piece of garbage that you are.

You really don't have to work this hard at figuring out why I look down on you, Lice. Just grab a mirror.

You sound like you are a member of one of those junk cults. Southern Baptist maybe?
You obviously have not read Leviticus or Deuteronomy. You are hilarious.

There are different levels of Baptist. The one I was raised in was mild like Methodist. Then there was the ones preaching on street corners and telling all about the fire and brimstone that awaits all those who do not subscribe..

Good luck with your adventures into untra-orthodox Judaism. Are you still unclean? Please don't slaughter any animals.This is what you want. This is what you get. This apparently is what you want in your life.

Yes, there is no difference between the food restrictions of the Israelites and the moral restrictions for all God's followers. So saith Reverend Lice, when absolutely no one asked her to preach on how to live and serve God because absolutely no one admires and emulates the end result that is her.

There is literally no amount of scorn that will ever cut through your ego and desperation and register on you, is there? You just can't help yourself.

I bet that you are one of the people sucking after graham, jeffess, focus on the family, family research council, perkins. Do you deny it? These people do not represent Jesus whatsoever. Why do you want to turn the Christain faith into garbage?

Yes, the fact that I scorn and mock you and reject any claim you make to any sort of moral authority MUST be about fandom of some bunch of televangelists you, in your deep and profound ignorance of all things religious, have determined are representative of all Christianity.

It couldn't possibly just be because I'm a human being, and like all human beings, I shun you as the piece of garbage that you are.

You really don't have to work this hard at figuring out why I look down on you, Lice. Just grab a mirror.

You sound like you are a member of one of those junk cults. Southern Baptist maybe?
You obviously have not read Leviticus or Deuteronomy. You are hilarious.

There are different levels of Baptist. The one I was raised in was mild like Methodist. Then there was the ones preaching on street corners and telling all about the fire and brimstone that awaits all those who do not subscribe..

Thank you. I have known some very lovely people who were Baptists, yet the father of one of my best friends in high school was a Baptist from Tennessee and he was a real jackass. I take it that the Baptists have split and have been split for a long time. You get people like Al Gore or Jimmy Carter or Al Sharpton. Then you get the Falwell types. I do get the impression that people who identify as "Southern" Baptist are jerks. It's confusing.