Me: Communism has killed 94 million people...

Yes it is because it relies on the other People's money.


Taxes are not socialism either.


Does it never occur to you, that if you have to lie constantly to defend your positions, that you should change your positions?
does it ever occur to You, that simply being clueless and Causeless is as full of worth, as having, nothing but repeal in the non-porn sector?

The social Power to Tax, is delegated to our federal Congress, for the Union.


No, you are the one who is being dishonest and obtuse.


Your desire to claim Tax as a part of SOcialism is just you tying to be dishonest so that you can support and defend socialism.


That you can know that you have to lie to defend your position, because the truth is not on your side,


yet you can't make the obvious realization that that means you are wrong,


is incredible to me.
I am on the left. I never take the right wing seriously unless it is one of their, twice a day moments. This is not one of them.

The social Power to Tax, is delegated to our federal Congress, for the Union.

Capitalism relies on voluntary social transactions. A free market has no Government.

Simply having a Central Bank, means we have a command economy.



Your dishonest nonsense is noted and dismissed.
Nothing but deflection instead of projection? You need a valid argument, or I win the argument and the point, simply Because, you have nothing but repeal.
 
Doesn't say anything about collectivism in there.
Only the clueless and the Causeless, say that.

Does not say one word about collectivism. Only the foolish would insinuate that it does.
Well regulated Militia, is a Collective. There is no such Thing as a Miltia of One. That is merely regular propaganda.


This has nothing to do with economic systems. Now, you're getting all schizophrenic.
Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".


Crazy talk.
 
Doesn't say anything about collectivism in there.
Only the clueless and the Causeless, say that.

Does not say one word about collectivism. Only the foolish would insinuate that it does.
Well regulated Militia, is a Collective. There is no such Thing as a Miltia of One. That is merely regular propaganda.


This has nothing to do with economic systems. Now, you're getting all schizophrenic.
Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".

They bailed out the banks by simply printing trillions and giving it to the banks. The US didnt have the money in the bank to bail out the banks.
 
Taxes are not socialism either.


Does it never occur to you, that if you have to lie constantly to defend your positions, that you should change your positions?
does it ever occur to You, that simply being clueless and Causeless is as full of worth, as having, nothing but repeal in the non-porn sector?

The social Power to Tax, is delegated to our federal Congress, for the Union.


No, you are the one who is being dishonest and obtuse.


Your desire to claim Tax as a part of SOcialism is just you tying to be dishonest so that you can support and defend socialism.


That you can know that you have to lie to defend your position, because the truth is not on your side,


yet you can't make the obvious realization that that means you are wrong,


is incredible to me.
I am on the left. I never take the right wing seriously unless it is one of their, twice a day moments. This is not one of them.

The social Power to Tax, is delegated to our federal Congress, for the Union.

Capitalism relies on voluntary social transactions. A free market has no Government.

Simply having a Central Bank, means we have a command economy.



Your dishonest nonsense is noted and dismissed.
Nothing but deflection instead of projection? You need a valid argument, or I win the argument and the point, simply Because, you have nothing but repeal.


The valid argument is that your attempt to claim all functions of government as "socialism" is dishonest crap that you use because you know that your support of socialism is bad for the majority of the people.


YOu actively and knowingly support policy that you know is bad.
 
Only the clueless and the Causeless, say that.

Does not say one word about collectivism. Only the foolish would insinuate that it does.
Well regulated Militia, is a Collective. There is no such Thing as a Miltia of One. That is merely regular propaganda.


This has nothing to do with economic systems. Now, you're getting all schizophrenic.
Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".


Crazy talk.
I am on the federal left, it is practically federal dogma to not take the right wing seriously, but for their, twice a day moments.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
 
Yes, it is a fact. We even named it, we call our collective society the United States of America.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


Doesn't say anything about collectivism in there.
You're an imbecile.


I'm right.
I didn't say collectivism idiot. I said collective.


The collectivism is what you want implemented. It is the result of the state applying there control on the collective. You're not real bright.
You're trying to shift the conversation due to your inability to reconcile the obvious contradiction. Thanks for playing.
 
Does not say one word about collectivism. Only the foolish would insinuate that it does.
Well regulated Militia, is a Collective. There is no such Thing as a Miltia of One. That is merely regular propaganda.


This has nothing to do with economic systems. Now, you're getting all schizophrenic.
Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".


Crazy talk.
I am on the federal left, it is practically federal dogma to not take the right wing seriously, but for their, twice a day moments.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.



Your words make no sense.


If you think they are making sense, you need to seek medical attention immediately.

If you are purposefully being obtuse for some stupid reasons, knock that shit off.
 
Doesn't say anything about collectivism in there.
You're an imbecile.


I'm right.
I didn't say collectivism idiot. I said collective.


The collectivism is what you want implemented. It is the result of the state applying there control on the collective. You're not real bright.
You're trying to shift the conversation due to your inability to reconcile the obvious contradiction. Thanks for playing.


Balancing the usefulness of working together with respect for individuals and individual rights is not an contradiction.


It is a normal part of any healthy society.


Always has been, always will.
 
Well regulated Militia, is a Collective. There is no such Thing as a Miltia of One. That is merely regular propaganda.


This has nothing to do with economic systems. Now, you're getting all schizophrenic.
Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".


Crazy talk.
I am on the federal left, it is practically federal dogma to not take the right wing seriously, but for their, twice a day moments.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.



Your words make no sense.


If you think they are making sense, you need to seek medical attention immediately.

If you are purposefully being obtuse for some stupid reasons, knock that shit off.
I quoted our federal Constitution.

I think I may make a motion for the establishment of the post of sergeant major general, for the Office of Dogma instead of drama.
 
You're an imbecile.


I'm right.
I didn't say collectivism idiot. I said collective.


The collectivism is what you want implemented. It is the result of the state applying there control on the collective. You're not real bright.
You're trying to shift the conversation due to your inability to reconcile the obvious contradiction. Thanks for playing.


Balancing the usefulness of working together with respect for individuals and individual rights is not an contradiction.


It is a normal part of any healthy society.


Always has been, always will.
If there is no contradiction then what need is there for balance?
 
This has nothing to do with economic systems. Now, you're getting all schizophrenic.
Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".


Crazy talk.
I am on the federal left, it is practically federal dogma to not take the right wing seriously, but for their, twice a day moments.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.



Your words make no sense.


If you think they are making sense, you need to seek medical attention immediately.

If you are purposefully being obtuse for some stupid reasons, knock that shit off.
I quoted our federal Constitution.

I think I may make a motion for the establishment of the post of sergeant major general, for the Office of Dogma instead of drama.


There was no easily deducible connection between that portion of our Constitution, and your post of gibberish.


If you think there was, the advice about medical attention holds.


If you know there was not, and you are just pretending, knock that shit off.
 
I'm right.
I didn't say collectivism idiot. I said collective.


The collectivism is what you want implemented. It is the result of the state applying there control on the collective. You're not real bright.
You're trying to shift the conversation due to your inability to reconcile the obvious contradiction. Thanks for playing.


Balancing the usefulness of working together with respect for individuals and individual rights is not an contradiction.


It is a normal part of any healthy society.


Always has been, always will.
If there is no contradiction then what need is there for balance?


Fine, then there is a "contradiction" and the way to "reconcile" it is to have a balance between the usefulness of working together and the value of individuality and individual rights.


Something that traditionally we have done well with in America, and that communists nations have failed at.
 
I didn't say collectivism idiot. I said collective.


The collectivism is what you want implemented. It is the result of the state applying there control on the collective. You're not real bright.
You're trying to shift the conversation due to your inability to reconcile the obvious contradiction. Thanks for playing.


Balancing the usefulness of working together with respect for individuals and individual rights is not an contradiction.


It is a normal part of any healthy society.


Always has been, always will.
If there is no contradiction then what need is there for balance?


Fine, then there is a "contradiction" and the way to "reconcile" it is to have a balance between the usefulness of working together and the value of individuality and individual rights.


Something that traditionally we have done well with in America, and that communists nations have failed at.
The neo-liberal order which has been in place for nearly 50 years now has exacted a toll on us.
 
The collectivism is what you want implemented. It is the result of the state applying there control on the collective. You're not real bright.
You're trying to shift the conversation due to your inability to reconcile the obvious contradiction. Thanks for playing.


Balancing the usefulness of working together with respect for individuals and individual rights is not an contradiction.


It is a normal part of any healthy society.


Always has been, always will.
If there is no contradiction then what need is there for balance?


Fine, then there is a "contradiction" and the way to "reconcile" it is to have a balance between the usefulness of working together and the value of individuality and individual rights.


Something that traditionally we have done well with in America, and that communists nations have failed at.
The neo-liberal order which has been in place for nearly 50 years now has exacted a toll on us.


I agree.
 
Doesn't say anything about collectivism in there.
You're an imbecile.


I'm right.
I didn't say collectivism idiot. I said collective.


The collectivism is what you want implemented. It is the result of the state applying there control on the collective. You're not real bright.
You're trying to shift the conversation due to your inability to reconcile the obvious contradiction. Thanks for playing.

Not shifting anything. Just pointing out your view. There is no contradiction on what capitalism or communism is. One rewards the state or collective, the other rewards the individual.
 
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".
 
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".


Nothing in that quote supports your conclusion.


If you truly see something that does, see your doctor, no strike that,


go to the emergency room now, before you hurt yourself.
 
Every sergeant major general should have a clearly defined, mission statement:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
 
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".

So tell us how the govt bails out capitalism.
 
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Context is everything. The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".


Nothing in that quote supports your conclusion.


If you truly see something that does, see your doctor, no strike that,


go to the emergency room now, before you hurt yourself.
this is my conclusion; mr. diversion.

The US must have a republican form of Government to "bailout capitalism".
 

Forum List

Back
Top