- Banned
- #101
Probably not.....we are ALL out to get him.So, do you think that there is there anyone in the world not conspiring against Donald Trump?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Probably not.....we are ALL out to get him.So, do you think that there is there anyone in the world not conspiring against Donald Trump?
Maybe if you give your evidence to the Authorities in bigger and bolder font...........Mueller's purpose is to give a Democrat controlled House the document they needed to bring impeachment charges against Trump. That will be his statement.Victoria Toensing: Why has Mueller ignored Obama administration crimes?
"The sorry saga began with a January 12, 2017 column about the Flynn/Kislyak conversations by The Washington Post’s David Ignatius, who described his source as a “senior U.S. government official,” i.e., an Obama administration functionary. Whoever told Ignatius the fact of and substance of the eavesdropped conversations committed a felony by leaking classified information.
The second crime is publicly revealing a U.S. citizen’s identity as being a party to those conversations. When there is authorized intelligence collection of foreign officials, the identity of the U.S. person who is incidentally picked up during that collection is to be minimized (not disclosed), even within the U.S. government. Instead of the party’s name, the document substitutes “[U.S. Person].” There is a process for “unmasking”—obtaining the name of the undisclosed person--when the government official determines knowing the name is important to national security. A written request must be made to the collecting agency that is responsible for the document. Only a handful of officials are given that authority, e.g. NSA has only 20. Perhaps there was a valid need for an Obama official to know Flynn’s identity. That issue is irrelevant. Providing it to Ignatius was a crime."
"Before Flynn flunked remembering every word of a conversation he was asked to recall weeks later, an Obama administration official had egregiously broken the national security and privacy laws. But only Flynn has been charged with a crime.
"Not only was the basis for questioning Flynn a ruse, but more significantly the FBI did not have to ask him about the conversations to determine if there was a crime because it had the transcripts and recordings of every single word. If Flynn had committed any illegal act in the conversations, the Justice Department could have indicted him that day. But it did not. Nor did Mueller ever mention such an illegality in his December 2017 charges against Flynn for false statements."
"Mueller should have pursued these crimes as he is authorized to investigate any crime he finds in the course of the “collusion” investigation. He has had no problem charging Paul Manafort for decades-old tax crimes and looking into former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions. Yet the crimes against Flynn have been ignored. Why?"
WE ALL KNOW WHY!
So, this is what we have:
So this whole conspiracy is based off of the fact that Obama spied on a political opponent. With the help of the FBI he conducted political espionage against the current president in an attempt to win the 2020 election. The whole purpose of it is purely political. There is no legal basis to any of it. Hillary rigged the 2016 nomination and now Democrats are in the process of rigging the 2020 election.
- This investigation began because Obama wanted to spy on the Trump campaign
- They used a fake document paid for by Hillary and the DNC to start an FBI investigation
- They recommended that Trump fire the FBI director for incompetence
- They created a Special Council investigation because Trump fired his FBI director
- The Special Council's report will be the foundation for impeachment
- They feel that Trump will lose the 2020 election because he had been impeached and thus tainted
What Obama and Clinton did were Felonies and they both should be brought up on charges. The clear indicator that The Mueller investigation is a witch hunt and that he is a fraud is how he populated his staff and the fact that he refuses to look in to how an Obama Paid for, Clinton funded piece or Putin Approved Propaganda found its way in to a FISA court and in to false affdavits that were used to spy on a Presidential Candidate during his campaign by an Incumbent President.
And people though Dick Nixon taping conversations in The White House was bad?
Stormy????Lol, you mean the one that ended up paying him?A list of Trump wrongs is endless. He is presently being accused of conspiring to defraud American voters by paying off sexual escapade partners to be silent about his adultery and bad judgment. The concept in question is that if voters knew about the sex partners they may not have voted for Trump, hence, fraud.Trump has done nothing wrong, but we know liberals will lie to prosecute if you don't like someone. Kavanaugh is proof.You guys are so obsessed with Obama and Hillary you are unable to defend Trump without the standby lame "what about" defense. You are so dependent on it you are in denial about how foolish it is. "Look, that lady is shoplifting". "Don't worry, ignore her" you reply, "a man shoplifted yesterday".We know from experience that you libtards don't need probable-cause to begin investigations. You don't need or support due process, because it doesn't fit your beliefs. You regularly convict people with tainted testimony from people with highly suspicious motives.
Supposedly Trump is guilty of criminal behavior because Obama and Hillary really are guilty as fuck of the same. But there's one problem. You don't have a crime. Mueller will supply you with one, even though it would never stand up in court in a million years. But, who cares, right?
That's quite a stretch.A list of Trump wrongs is endless. He is presently being accused of conspiring to defraud American voters by paying off sexual escapade partners to be silent about his adultery and bad judgment. The concept in question is that if voters knew about the sex partners they may not have voted for Trump, hence, fraud.Trump has done nothing wrong, but we know liberals will lie to prosecute if you don't like someone. Kavanaugh is proof.You guys are so obsessed with Obama and Hillary you are unable to defend Trump without the standby lame "what about" defense. You are so dependent on it you are in denial about how foolish it is. "Look, that lady is shoplifting". "Don't worry, ignore her" you reply, "a man shoplifted yesterday".We know from experience that you libtards don't need probable-cause to begin investigations. You don't need or support due process, because it doesn't fit your beliefs. You regularly convict people with tainted testimony from people with highly suspicious motives.Trump is being overwhelmingly exposed as a criminal liar and probably impeachable offenses and his supporters here on USMB are still blabbering bu...bu...bu...Obama.....Hillary.
Supposedly Trump is guilty of criminal behavior because Obama and Hillary really are guilty as fuck of the same. But there's one problem. You don't have a crime. Mueller will supply you with one, even though it would never stand up in court in a million years. But, who cares, right?
The bigger....the better.Maybe if you give your evidence to the Authorities in bigger and bolder font...........Mueller's purpose is to give a Democrat controlled House the document they needed to bring impeachment charges against Trump. That will be his statement.Victoria Toensing: Why has Mueller ignored Obama administration crimes?
"The sorry saga began with a January 12, 2017 column about the Flynn/Kislyak conversations by The Washington Post’s David Ignatius, who described his source as a “senior U.S. government official,” i.e., an Obama administration functionary. Whoever told Ignatius the fact of and substance of the eavesdropped conversations committed a felony by leaking classified information.
The second crime is publicly revealing a U.S. citizen’s identity as being a party to those conversations. When there is authorized intelligence collection of foreign officials, the identity of the U.S. person who is incidentally picked up during that collection is to be minimized (not disclosed), even within the U.S. government. Instead of the party’s name, the document substitutes “[U.S. Person].” There is a process for “unmasking”—obtaining the name of the undisclosed person--when the government official determines knowing the name is important to national security. A written request must be made to the collecting agency that is responsible for the document. Only a handful of officials are given that authority, e.g. NSA has only 20. Perhaps there was a valid need for an Obama official to know Flynn’s identity. That issue is irrelevant. Providing it to Ignatius was a crime."
"Before Flynn flunked remembering every word of a conversation he was asked to recall weeks later, an Obama administration official had egregiously broken the national security and privacy laws. But only Flynn has been charged with a crime.
"Not only was the basis for questioning Flynn a ruse, but more significantly the FBI did not have to ask him about the conversations to determine if there was a crime because it had the transcripts and recordings of every single word. If Flynn had committed any illegal act in the conversations, the Justice Department could have indicted him that day. But it did not. Nor did Mueller ever mention such an illegality in his December 2017 charges against Flynn for false statements."
"Mueller should have pursued these crimes as he is authorized to investigate any crime he finds in the course of the “collusion” investigation. He has had no problem charging Paul Manafort for decades-old tax crimes and looking into former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s taxi medallions. Yet the crimes against Flynn have been ignored. Why?"
WE ALL KNOW WHY!
So, this is what we have:
So this whole conspiracy is based off of the fact that Obama spied on a political opponent. With the help of the FBI he conducted political espionage against the current president in an attempt to win the 2020 election. The whole purpose of it is purely political. There is no legal basis to any of it. Hillary rigged the 2016 nomination and now Democrats are in the process of rigging the 2020 election.
- This investigation began because Obama wanted to spy on the Trump campaign
- They used a fake document paid for by Hillary and the DNC to start an FBI investigation
- They recommended that Trump fire the FBI director for incompetence
- They created a Special Council investigation because Trump fired his FBI director
- The Special Council's report will be the foundation for impeachment
- They feel that Trump will lose the 2020 election because he had been impeached and thus tainted
What Obama and Clinton did were Felonies and they both should be brought up on charges. The clear indicator that The Mueller investigation is a witch hunt and that he is a fraud is how he populated his staff and the fact that he refuses to look in to how an Obama Paid for, Clinton funded piece or Putin Approved Propaganda found its way in to a FISA court and in to false affdavits that were used to spy on a Presidential Candidate during his campaign by an Incumbent President.
And people though Dick Nixon taping conversations in The White House was bad?
What the hell are you talking about?Stormy????Lol, you mean the one that ended up paying him?A list of Trump wrongs is endless. He is presently being accused of conspiring to defraud American voters by paying off sexual escapade partners to be silent about his adultery and bad judgment. The concept in question is that if voters knew about the sex partners they may not have voted for Trump, hence, fraud.Trump has done nothing wrong, but we know liberals will lie to prosecute if you don't like someone. Kavanaugh is proof.You guys are so obsessed with Obama and Hillary you are unable to defend Trump without the standby lame "what about" defense. You are so dependent on it you are in denial about how foolish it is. "Look, that lady is shoplifting". "Don't worry, ignore her" you reply, "a man shoplifted yesterday".
Could be but isn't 'cause you guys live in La la Trumpland of delusions and denials.That's quite a stretch.A list of Trump wrongs is endless. He is presently being accused of conspiring to defraud American voters by paying off sexual escapade partners to be silent about his adultery and bad judgment. The concept in question is that if voters knew about the sex partners they may not have voted for Trump, hence, fraud.Trump has done nothing wrong, but we know liberals will lie to prosecute if you don't like someone. Kavanaugh is proof.You guys are so obsessed with Obama and Hillary you are unable to defend Trump without the standby lame "what about" defense. You are so dependent on it you are in denial about how foolish it is. "Look, that lady is shoplifting". "Don't worry, ignore her" you reply, "a man shoplifted yesterday".We know from experience that you libtards don't need probable-cause to begin investigations. You don't need or support due process, because it doesn't fit your beliefs. You regularly convict people with tainted testimony from people with highly suspicious motives.Trump is being overwhelmingly exposed as a criminal liar and probably impeachable offenses and his supporters here on USMB are still blabbering bu...bu...bu...Obama.....Hillary.
Supposedly Trump is guilty of criminal behavior because Obama and Hillary really are guilty as fuck of the same. But there's one problem. You don't have a crime. Mueller will supply you with one, even though it would never stand up in court in a million years. But, who cares, right?
Making promises during a campaign and not coming thru could be considered fraud as well.
Stormy Daniels has been sued to pay Trumps legal fees.What the hell are you talking about?Stormy????Lol, you mean the one that ended up paying him?A list of Trump wrongs is endless. He is presently being accused of conspiring to defraud American voters by paying off sexual escapade partners to be silent about his adultery and bad judgment. The concept in question is that if voters knew about the sex partners they may not have voted for Trump, hence, fraud.Trump has done nothing wrong, but we know liberals will lie to prosecute if you don't like someone. Kavanaugh is proof.
Obama barely kept any of his campaign promises. Crickets about it from you. Trump has kept almost all of his, with his own party working against him.Could be but isn't 'cause you guys live in La la Trumpland of delusions and denials.That's quite a stretch.A list of Trump wrongs is endless. He is presently being accused of conspiring to defraud American voters by paying off sexual escapade partners to be silent about his adultery and bad judgment. The concept in question is that if voters knew about the sex partners they may not have voted for Trump, hence, fraud.Trump has done nothing wrong, but we know liberals will lie to prosecute if you don't like someone. Kavanaugh is proof.You guys are so obsessed with Obama and Hillary you are unable to defend Trump without the standby lame "what about" defense. You are so dependent on it you are in denial about how foolish it is. "Look, that lady is shoplifting". "Don't worry, ignore her" you reply, "a man shoplifted yesterday".We know from experience that you libtards don't need probable-cause to begin investigations. You don't need or support due process, because it doesn't fit your beliefs. You regularly convict people with tainted testimony from people with highly suspicious motives.
Supposedly Trump is guilty of criminal behavior because Obama and Hillary really are guilty as fuck of the same. But there's one problem. You don't have a crime. Mueller will supply you with one, even though it would never stand up in court in a million years. But, who cares, right?
Making promises during a campaign and not coming thru could be considered fraud as well.
You guys are so obsessed with Obama and Hillary you are unable to defend Trump without the standby lame "what about" defense. You are so dependent on it you are in denial about how foolish it is. "Look, that lady is shoplifting". "Don't worry, ignore her" you reply, "a man shoplifted yesterday".We know from experience that you libtards don't need probable-cause to begin investigations. You don't need or support due process, because it doesn't fit your beliefs. You regularly convict people with tainted testimony from people with highly suspicious motives.Trump is being overwhelmingly exposed as a criminal liar and probably impeachable offenses and his supporters here on USMB are still blabbering bu...bu...bu...Obama.....Hillary.
Supposedly Trump is guilty of criminal behavior because Obama and Hillary really are guilty as fuck of the same. But there's one problem. You don't have a crime. Mueller will supply you with one, even though it would never stand up in court in a million years. But, who cares, right?
The hypocrisy is being pointed out as libs such as yourself didnt utter nary the slightest squeal when O was engaging in illegal activities such as hiding campaign donations, solyndra, benghazi etc.
We're talking reality here now, not some liberal fantasy land filled with Unicorns.Could be but isn't 'cause you guys live in La la Trumpland of delusions and denials.That's quite a stretch.A list of Trump wrongs is endless. He is presently being accused of conspiring to defraud American voters by paying off sexual escapade partners to be silent about his adultery and bad judgment. The concept in question is that if voters knew about the sex partners they may not have voted for Trump, hence, fraud.Trump has done nothing wrong, but we know liberals will lie to prosecute if you don't like someone. Kavanaugh is proof.You guys are so obsessed with Obama and Hillary you are unable to defend Trump without the standby lame "what about" defense. You are so dependent on it you are in denial about how foolish it is. "Look, that lady is shoplifting". "Don't worry, ignore her" you reply, "a man shoplifted yesterday".We know from experience that you libtards don't need probable-cause to begin investigations. You don't need or support due process, because it doesn't fit your beliefs. You regularly convict people with tainted testimony from people with highly suspicious motives.
Supposedly Trump is guilty of criminal behavior because Obama and Hillary really are guilty as fuck of the same. But there's one problem. You don't have a crime. Mueller will supply you with one, even though it would never stand up in court in a million years. But, who cares, right?
Making promises during a campaign and not coming thru could be considered fraud as well.
WE ALL KNOW WHY!
The GOP had two years of complete control.
They had nothing, so they did nothing.
That's not fake news, it's not the swamp, it's not the RINOs.
This talk radio alternate universe stuff is fun 'n stuff, but it's just not reality.
.