- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,201
- 2,180
Yes, I do know what that means. How does that fact of physics prove global warming is a fact?Global warming is a con. CO2 is not changing the climate.CO2 exisit in the air but too much is the issue and not that there is already some
plenty of biologists say its beneficial well the issue is still to much
To much? Really? Prior to the onset of the present ice age, the atmospheric CO2 was about 1000ppm.
And aside from that, can you provide any physical evidence to support the claim that CO2 is changing the global climate rather than simply reacting to the global climate as all historic ice core studies show?
I do not know where you get your numbers
The real story is Coal-fired power plants are the largest source for atmospheric CO2 concentrations (easily bypassing vehicles) and readings have shown then reaching 400 parts per million which is setting new records in the history of man. Pre industrial times numbers are about 280 ppm. So obviously coal fired plants are a problem.
Sheesh, poor little dumb fuck, did you ever hear of absorption spectra? Do you even have any idea of what those words mean? Well, google is your friend.