Life as a poor American is a life of slavery

Really not the point.

I would rather be dirt poor and free..then a rich slave.

Slavery is an abomination.

I'll bet you $1.00 that the first slaves were volunteers.


1.jpg


will-work-for-food.jpg

You'd probably lose. Most slaves initially were people captured during warfare.
 
Ah from the "wage slaves". Yet, the rich work harder and for longer hours than the "slaves" who have a nice quitting time.

They want to be supported, like infants.

I say enslave OWS because maybe then they would appreciate the dollar - no pun intended.
 
The OWS are born to be slaves. They are willing to work, if the can do as little as possible, preferably a job smoking dope and banging a pot they call a drum.

They would be happiest in a life of slavery where every facet of their lives was the responsibility of the master. As long as it was a generous master.
 
The OWS are born to be slaves. They are willing to work, if the can do as little as possible, preferably a job smoking dope and banging a pot they call a drum.

They would be happiest in a life of slavery where every facet of their lives was the responsibility of the master. As long as it was a generous master.

Being paid to champion er parrot Marxist propaganda for personal gain???

Get outta here...

They were only making gay porn films to profit and rip off the evil capitalist homos ...:lol:
 
Last edited:
Really not the point.

I would rather be dirt poor and free..then a rich slave.

Slavery is an abomination.

I'll bet you $1.00 that the first slaves were volunteers.


1.jpg


will-work-for-food.jpg

You'd probably lose. Most slaves initially were people captured during warfare.

I'll bet that same dollar that slavery is older than war. It doesn't stretch the imagination too far to see family groups taking in orphans, feeding and sheltering them in exchange for work - You don't expect those little bastards to get any of the family inheritance do you? How unfair is that?
 
I'll bet you $1.00 that the first slaves were volunteers.


1.jpg


will-work-for-food.jpg

You'd probably lose. Most slaves initially were people captured during warfare.

I'll bet that same dollar that slavery is older than war. It doesn't stretch the imagination too far to see family groups taking in orphans, feeding and sheltering them in exchange for work - You don't expect those little bastards to get any of the family inheritance do you? How unfair is that?

War is as old as prostitution. But not as much fun. :lol:
 
Ah from the "wage slaves". Yet, the rich work harder and for longer hours than the "slaves" who have a nice quitting time.

They want to be supported, like infants.

I say enslave OWS because maybe then they would appreciate the dollar - no pun intended.

Can't say it can't be done, but I hope not - A return to slavery would take a generation so destitute that they volunteer servitude in exchange for food and shelter.




:eusa_think: How do y'all feel about welfare recipients picking up trash along the roads?
 
The OWS are born to be slaves. They are willing to work, if the can do as little as possible, preferably a job smoking dope and banging a pot they call a drum.

They would be happiest in a life of slavery where every facet of their lives was the responsibility of the master. As long as it was a generous master.

:eusa_eh: "The OWS are born to be slaves"?

You make them sound like a 'people' that can only be saved if Moses parts the East River and leads them into Jersey.

I think that schtick was already used, successfully to, from what I understand.
 
Ah from the "wage slaves". Yet, the rich work harder and for longer hours than the "slaves" who have a nice quitting time.

They want to be supported, like infants.

I say enslave OWS because maybe then they would appreciate the dollar - no pun intended.

Can't say it can't be done, but I hope not - A return to slavery would take a generation so destitute that they volunteer servitude in exchange for food and shelter.




:eusa_think: How do y'all feel about welfare recipients picking up trash along the roads?

There would be revolution before that happened.

No American would submit to slavery.
 
You'd probably lose. Most slaves initially were people captured during warfare.

I'll bet that same dollar that slavery is older than war. It doesn't stretch the imagination too far to see family groups taking in orphans, feeding and sheltering them in exchange for work - You don't expect those little bastards to get any of the family inheritance do you? How unfair is that?

War is as old as prostitution. But not as much fun. :lol:

If the first war wasn't over property, it was over pussy.

No. I don't have a link - look around you.​
 
The OWS are born to be slaves. They are willing to work, if the can do as little as possible, preferably a job smoking dope and banging a pot they call a drum.

They would be happiest in a life of slavery where every facet of their lives was the responsibility of the master. As long as it was a generous master.

The OWS are born to be slaves. They are willing to work, if the can do as little as possible, preferably a job smoking dope and banging a pot they call a drum.

They would be happiest in a life of slavery where every facet of their lives was the responsibility of the master. As long as it was a generous master.

:eusa_eh: "The OWS are born to be slaves"?

You make them sound like a 'people' that can only be saved if Moses parts the East River and leads them into Jersey.

I think that schtick was already used, successfully to, from what I understand.

I believe picking up their own garbage is too difficult for them..

Yea, they're idiot slaves..

If they don't want to work I would suggest putting them to work - they can start with picking up their own shit...

No, I don't believe in slavery, however I do believe in punishments for actions - I also believe in cleaning up after OCW has occupied - both of which are delusional ideas to the occupy movement...

I hope all those who are arrested are sentenced to thousands of hours or community service...
 
Last edited:
Slavery is a pretty harsh term. Our leaders did not sell us in servitude, as what happened with the Africans. You do not here that fact, there are those who wish to believe we just strolled onto another continent and against the will of millions of Africans took the slaves, not so they were sold out by their own kind. As far as the rest, if you do not put forth your best effort you will never achieve the best results. Are you a second or third welfare recipient by any chance? OWS is an ok movement. I would rather face a dirty, stinky ,pot head than a lunatic right winger with a side arm. No pepper spray for them. The stoners pose a bigger threat because their cause can actually spread and succeed.
 
Slavery is a pretty harsh term. Our leaders did not sell us in servitude, as what happened with the Africans. You do not here that fact, there are those who wish to believe we just strolled onto another continent and against the will of millions of Africans took the slaves, not so they were sold out by their own kind. As far as the rest, if you do not put forth your best effort you will never achieve the best results. Are you a second or third welfare recipient by any chance? OWS is an ok movement. I would rather face a dirty, stinky ,pot head than a lunatic right winger with a side arm. No pepper spray for them.
The stoners pose a bigger threat because their cause can actually spread and succeed.

:iagree:
 
What really bothers me about America today, is how inaccessible a good college education is to kids from really poor families. Yes, there are scholarships for the top 5%. You can get a student loan that puts in you hock the rest of life but it may only cover half your cost.

When I went to college back in the 60's, I had a $400/yr government scholastic that paid for my tuition to a state university. Anyone who graduated from high school with above average grades could get one. There was no college savings plan, because it wasn't needed. I earned enough working summers to pay for my dorm room. My parents paid for my meal ticket and some misc. expenses. I just saw where our state university raised the tuition to $15,000/yr, $60,000 for 4 years and that's for in state students. The total cost would be about $80K for 4 years. A kid could go to a junior college for 2 years and 2 years in a cheaper state school and get the total cost down $40K, but for so many kids that just as well be a million dollars.

Then there is problem of being accepted at a university. Due to limited number of seats for new students, in most states if you're not in the top 15% with a good SAT score, you won't qualify. When you consider that really poor kids usually go to rather poor schools with poor college prep classes, their chance of qualifying for a good college is at best poor. Add in the financial costs and there are very few poor kids that can make it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top