Liberals Blur The Line....Again

[regent]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

 

[gipper]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon fed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

"declared best president"

Only by the ignorant, the Leftist drones like you, and those willing to overlook his destruction of the Constitution...and posts #16-17-and-18.



But...have no fear....I'm here to save the day!!!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon feed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

 

[mamooth]

FDR squashed the Nazis.

Hence, Nazi sympathizers will hate him forever.

It really is that simple. Scratch an FDR-hater, find a Nazi-symp.

 

[gipper]

FDR squashed the Nazis.

Hence, Nazi sympathizers will hate him forever.

It really is that simple. Scratch an FDR-hater, find a Nazi-symp.

FDR empowered the Commies...you must be so proud.

 

[mamooth]

FDR, and then Truman, set up the containment system that won the cold war.

That is, we had won, until your boy surrendered unconditionally to the commies.

 

[regent]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon feed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon feed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

 

[regent]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon feed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

Not too reliable, missed one election.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon feed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

Not too reliable, missed one election.

We've established that you don't think....you rely on some group to do your thinking and to tell you what to say.


You never even attempt to deny what I post.....because, of course, you can't.

Are we done here?

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR elected four times by the American people, declared best president by a committee of 238 of America's best historians. Never selected as less than third best president since historians began rating presidents in 1948. Made sure Americans had food during the Great Depression. Was president when America and its allies won WWII. Had to fight Republicans and America-Firsters to prepare American defenses. Changed the Democratic party by inviting blacks and minorities to leave the party of Lincoln and become Democrats.

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon feed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

Not too reliable, missed one election.

Always surprising to me how you Leftist have been trained to accept your own iniquity with a shrug.


Liberalism, joined at the hip to nihilism:
Nihilism:
"... the rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless.

...the doctrine of an extreme Russian revolutionary party circa 1900, which found nothing to approve of in the established social order."
Google.

In very much the same way, every Leftist cult....Liberalism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Nazism, and Progressivism....is an off-shoot of nihilism.

 

[gipper]

Same old appeal to authority. Ignoring the truth that has been spoon feed you for years. Apparently you are unable to learn new things...like an old dog.

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

Not too reliable, missed one election.

We've established that you don't think....you rely on some group to do your thinking and to tell you what to say.


You never even attempt to deny what I post.....because, of course, you can't.

Are we done here?

Reggie lets statists historians think for him.

 

[gipper]

FDR, and then Truman, set up the containment system that won the cold war.

That is, we had won, until your boy surrendered unconditionally to the commies.

Yeah...they set up the system that fucked millions of people, yet you think that admirable.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR, and then Truman, set up the containment system that won the cold war.

That is, we had won, until your boy surrendered unconditionally to the commies.

You're here for your history lesson?

Excellent.

1. FDR was the facilitator for communism and for Stalin.
George Kennan, recognizing Roosevelt's attachment to Stalin, wrote the 'containment' doctrine, since Roosevelt would hear of no plan to stop communism.
After all, he signed on to Stalin's proposal for a United Socialist Nations, the UN.



2. George Kennan’s view of Roosevelt’s performance during the war ....

After commenting bitterly on the “inexcusable body of ignorance about the Russian Communist movement, about the history of its diplomacy, about what had happened in the purges, and about what had been going on in Poland and the Baltic States,” Kennan turns more directly to FDR alone:

I also have in mind FDRs evident conviction that Stalin, while perhaps a somewhat
difficult customer, was only, after all, a person like any other person; that the reason
we hadn’t been able to get along with him in the past was that we had never really had anyone with the proper personality and the proper qualities of sympathy and imagination to deal with him, that he had been snubbed all along by the arrogant conservatives of the Western capitals; and that if only he could be exposed to the persuasive charms of someone like FDR himself, ideological preconceptions would melt and Russia’s cooperation with the West could be easily arranged.

For these assumptions there were no grounds whatsover; and they were of a puerility that was unworthy of a statesman of FDRs stature"
http://www.mmisi.org/ma/30_02/nisbet.pdf



I strongly recommend that you look up "puerility" before you imagine it a compliment.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR squashed the Nazis.

Hence, Nazi sympathizers will hate him forever.

It really is that simple. Scratch an FDR-hater, find a Nazi-symp.

Study one who reveals the truth about FDR any you will find far more education than you have accomplished.

That's why you cannot deny anything I post.


You should study more and boot-lick less.

 

[PoliticalChic]

FDR, and then Truman, set up the containment system that won the cold war.

That is, we had won, until your boy surrendered unconditionally to the commies.

While under Roosevelt's control, Truman was pro-communist...like FDR.

But...he accepted education:
1. June 4, 1945, in a 15-minute meeting with General Carter W. Clarke, and Colonel Ernest Gibson, of Army intelligence, Truman was informed about army codebreakers working on secret cables sent from Moscow to Washington- the Venona decrypts.
"Sacred Secrets: How Soviet Intelligence Operations Changed American History," p. 111, Leona Schecter and Jerrold Schecter




2. President Harry S. Truman signed United States Executive Order 9835, sometimes known as the "Loyalty Order", on March 22, 1947.[1] The order established the first general loyalty program in the United States, designed to root out communist influence in the U.S. federal government. Truman aimed to rally public opinion behind his Cold War policies with investigations conducted under its authority. He also hoped to quiet right-wing critics who accused Democrats of being soft on communism. Executive Order 9835 - Wikipedia


Admit how impressed you are with my knowledge.

 

[regent]

I've reduced our pal Reggie to whining about the stenographers....er, 'historians' again because he fears the pain of beginning to think for himself.

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

Not too reliable, missed one election.

We've established that you don't think....you rely on some group to do your thinking and to tell you what to say.


You never even attempt to deny what I post.....because, of course, you can't.

Are we done here?

Reggie lets statists historians think for him.

I tried making up my own history and it was great, but educated people laughed when gave them my version of Hitler winning WWII. I changed so many things that I almost
believed my own history. The biggest problem was trying to convince people that FDR was our most hated president and a communist, I convinced two people that FDR was really never elected and other people laughed at me.
I found it much easier to be on the side of experts in history. Do you make up your own history and do educated people laugh at your "think for yourself history"?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Boy, if I just was able to think like you, I would be thinking for myself and able to learn new things. It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians for history and scientists for science and so on. But I do think that people that are able to create their own history and science are to be envied.

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

Not too reliable, missed one election.

We've established that you don't think....you rely on some group to do your thinking and to tell you what to say.


You never even attempt to deny what I post.....because, of course, you can't.

Are we done here?

Reggie lets statists historians think for him.

I tried making up my own history and it was great, but educated people laughed when gave them my version of Hitler winning WWII. I changed so many things that I almost
believed my own history. The biggest problem was trying to convince people that FDR was our most hated president and a communist, I convinced two people that FDR was really never elected and other people laughed at me.
I found it much easier to be on the side of experts in history. Do you make up your own history and do educated people laugh at your "think for yourself history"?

Really funny stuff.




Don't give up the day job.



Oh...and, as you've found,....every bit of the history as I report is is accurate, true and correct.

 

[regent]

You don't think at all.
When confronted with the facts....you're constant refrain is "well....the historians...blah blah blah."

Example?

Posts #16-17-and -18.


Here ya' go: " It's tempting but I think I'll stick with the historians...."

Good 'thinking.'



You must be a reliable Democrat voter, huh?

Not too reliable, missed one election.

We've established that you don't think....you rely on some group to do your thinking and to tell you what to say.


You never even attempt to deny what I post.....because, of course, you can't.

Are we done here?

Reggie lets statists historians think for him.

I tried making up my own history and it was great, but educated people laughed when gave them my version of Hitler winning WWII. I changed so many things that I almost
believed my own history. The biggest problem was trying to convince people that FDR was our most hated president and a communist, I convinced two people that FDR was really never elected and other people laughed at me.
I found it much easier to be on the side of experts in history. Do you make up your own history and do educated people laugh at your "think for yourself history"?

Really funny stuff.




Don't give up the day job.



Oh...and, as you've found,....every bit of the history as I report is is accurate, true and correct.

How many Germans were interred in