You still have shown no proof that you are correct, and stop it with the trolley tracks idiot. The picture was of the KKK marching towards the garden. If you look at old pictures of the garden the first street over there are tracks on it. So take that stupid logic and eat shit! You may be wrong and the OP may be 100% correct. I've shown more proof of that than you have of the opposite. dummy#2Then you can explain to the class why "Liberals are not liking it", other than it's being flat-out bullshit
BULL SHIT.
The photo is what its original caption says it is --- a Klan funeral march on King Street in Madison Wisconsin, enroute to the Schroeder funeral home, taken on the 5th day of December 1924 by Arthur Vinje, the first photographer employed by the Wisconsin State Journal. Its Original Format Number is CF 67957 and its Original Dimensions are 10" x 8". ALL of which I already posted for your self-delusional lying ass. It is in no way "newly discovered"; it has nothing to do with any political party convention; it has nothing to do with New York, where the convention was; it has nothing to do with New Jersey, where the Klanbake was; it has nothing to do with any kind of politics at all.
Here it is in a whole different context:
And notice that this article is itself six years old. Go ahead and explain to the class how a photo can be "newly discovered" --- when it was used six years ago for a state-level retrospective article, supplied as an already-existing artifact by the archives of the Wisconsin Historical Society...... and shot as a regular part of his job by a photographer who died in 1972 at the age of 84.
FUCKING DUMBASS.
Say how's that research on "Forney Johnston" going? IDIOT.
Last edited: