Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ya, LAUSD is the best school district in America and churns out most of their kids knowing how to survive and advance in life.What about it? They know where I stand.Ever see teachers strike on the behalf of the kids?For the record I never said they were a problem. Find one post where I said that
Teachers are the problem.
Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
You are completely full of shit. Your posts here are all lies and prejudice.
Unions are teachers.Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Ever see teachers strike on the behalf of the kids?
Teachers are the problem.
Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
Correction: UNIONS only protest to make money or whatever. Teachers stand up to all kind of things all the time. Sometimes even parents, sometimes the kids themselves, their bosses, society, etc. For kids. Every day, in fact, unless they're bad teachers, and there are some.
And the good ones get increasingly exhausted because not only are we doing good work that is difficult, we are being told we should do more and more and more. Whassamatter with us, we can't MAKE all these kids learn?
Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Ever see teachers strike on the behalf of the kids?For the record I never said they were a problem. Find one post where I said that
Teachers are the problem.
Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
Their strike to help the kids is ...... OH WAIT TEACHERS ONLY STRIKE FOR THEMSELVES.Ya, LAUSD is the best school district in America and churns out most of their kids knowing how to survive and advance in life.What about it? They know where I stand.Ever see teachers strike on the behalf of the kids?
Teachers are the problem.
Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
You are completely full of shit. Your posts here are all lies and prejudice.
Everyone, does the LAUSD struggle because:
1. Inexplicably, the LAUSD is full of really horrible teachers who just want to come to work for the money OR
2. The children come from very difficult life situations that put them behind from the jump
Gosh. That seems a hard call. Let me think on it
Unions are teachers.Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
Correction: UNIONS only protest to make money or whatever. Teachers stand up to all kind of things all the time. Sometimes even parents, sometimes the kids themselves, their bosses, society, etc. For kids. Every day, in fact, unless they're bad teachers, and there are some.
And the good ones get increasingly exhausted because not only are we doing good work that is difficult, we are being told we should do more and more and more. Whassamatter with us, we can't MAKE all these kids learn?
And right now TEACHERS walked out on 60,000 kids.
Ya, teacher mega retirement packages is for the children.Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Ever see teachers strike on the behalf of the kids?
Teachers are the problem.
Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
How about this one. Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years ad years of not being properly funded by the state.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
Unions are teachers.Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
Correction: UNIONS only protest to make money or whatever. Teachers stand up to all kind of things all the time. Sometimes even parents, sometimes the kids themselves, their bosses, society, etc. For kids. Every day, in fact, unless they're bad teachers, and there are some.
And the good ones get increasingly exhausted because not only are we doing good work that is difficult, we are being told we should do more and more and more. Whassamatter with us, we can't MAKE all these kids learn?
And right now TEACHERS walked out on 60,000 kids.
Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Ever see teachers strike on the behalf of the kids?
Teachers are the problem.
Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
How about this one? Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years and years of not being properly funded by the state by Democrats.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
Ya, teacher mega retirement packages is for the children.Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
How about this one. Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years ad years of not being properly funded by the state.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
This thread validates teachers are only concerned about themselves and screw the kids over to make themselves richer.
Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
How about this one? Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years and years of not being properly funded by the state by Democrats.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
OH but teachers don't deserve a pension or benefits or anything like that. It's such an easy job. Minimum wage, maybe less. Aren't they just babysitters?
This is how we're treating teachers and now, this is exactly what we're getting. And, America deserves exactly what is coming because of it. Spiraling right down the drain, like so many other aspects of society. I hate to say it, but we richly deserve what's coming.
Ya, teacher mega retirement packages is for the children.Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.Didn’t you claim to have a bunch of friends who are teachers?
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
How about this one. Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years ad years of not being properly funded by the state.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
This thread validates teachers are only concerned about themselves and screw the kids over to make themselves richer.
Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.What about it? They know where I stand.
Teachers rarely stand up for kids interests these days.
About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
How about this one? Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years and years of not being properly funded by the state by Democrats.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
OH but teachers don't deserve a pension or benefits or anything like that. It's such an easy job. Minimum wage, maybe less. Aren't they just babysitters?
This is how we're treating teachers and now, this is exactly what we're getting. And, America deserves exactly what is coming because of it. Spiraling right down the drain, like so many other aspects of society. I hate to say it, but we richly deserve what's coming.
Maybe, just maybe teachers should agree that stronger testing and higher standings to remain in the job need to be enacted.
Hard to defend a profession which has unions that fight to keep people who have actually abused children on the payroll. Let alone weeding out teachers who can't teach.
Instead we see teachers pretending they aren't at fault for ANYTHING.
7-4 job and get months off every year then a sweet retirement package the private sector only dreams about. Oh, and once past probation you have to basically commit a felony to get fired.
Teachers have it so bad.
Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.About 95% of the country's teachers are banned from striking for any reason by law, so how can you make such a ridiculous claim in the first place?
How about this one? Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years and years of not being properly funded by the state by Democrats.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
OH but teachers don't deserve a pension or benefits or anything like that. It's such an easy job. Minimum wage, maybe less. Aren't they just babysitters?
This is how we're treating teachers and now, this is exactly what we're getting. And, America deserves exactly what is coming because of it. Spiraling right down the drain, like so many other aspects of society. I hate to say it, but we richly deserve what's coming.
Maybe, just maybe teachers should agree that stronger testing and higher standings to remain in the job need to be enacted.
Hard to defend a profession which has unions that fight to keep people who have actually abused children on the payroll. Let alone weeding out teachers who can't teach.
Instead we see teachers pretending they aren't at fault for ANYTHING.
Why do you oppose due process?
I lost my assistant principal position because my boss wanted the job for her best friend. She told me that my contract was not being renewed after I saw my job posted in an email to the district. The reason we have unions is because administrators and school district personnel did this to teachers for a long time. I did nothing wrong, and she knew it, yet she could kick me to the curb in favor of her friend.
Thanks for verifying that teachers only protest to make money for themselves and never to help the kids.
How about this one? Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years and years of not being properly funded by the state by Democrats.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
OH but teachers don't deserve a pension or benefits or anything like that. It's such an easy job. Minimum wage, maybe less. Aren't they just babysitters?
This is how we're treating teachers and now, this is exactly what we're getting. And, America deserves exactly what is coming because of it. Spiraling right down the drain, like so many other aspects of society. I hate to say it, but we richly deserve what's coming.
Maybe, just maybe teachers should agree that stronger testing and higher standings to remain in the job need to be enacted.
Hard to defend a profession which has unions that fight to keep people who have actually abused children on the payroll. Let alone weeding out teachers who can't teach.
Instead we see teachers pretending they aren't at fault for ANYTHING.
Why do you oppose due process?
I lost my assistant principal position because my boss wanted the job for her best friend. She told me that my contract was not being renewed after I saw my job posted in an email to the district. The reason we have unions is because administrators and school district personnel did this to teachers for a long time. I did nothing wrong, and she knew it, yet she could kick me to the curb in favor of her friend.
Oh well, you don't have a right to a job. Though certainly I would hope that supervisors would hire the best person for the job, why should teaching be any different than any other job in that regard? If you work at let's say GM and they want to fire you, you're out. Why would teaching be any different (except for having the same protections as the guy or ga at GM does against discrimination etc etc)
As for due process, that's a legal term and has nothing to do with being fired from a job that due process is whatever is in your contract with your employer which could mean no due process and if you agreed to that, o h well.
How about this one? Although it was technically not a strike, last Spring, teachers in Kentucky were calling in sick in order to go protest at the state Capitol after the state's retirement fund and teacher retirement funds were about to be restructured by Republican legislators and governor after years and years of not being properly funded by the state by Democrats.
Days where the protests were made were only while the legislators were in session and because the retirement funding was going to be laid on the backs of current and future teachers for the most part, teachers knew that if the plan was allowed a huge percentage of teachers would be forced to opt to retire immediately, creating an instantaneous teacher shortage. We made sure we gave students work to complete at home if the counties decided to close the schools on those days.
Teachers got a benefit, but so did the kids for their future. The bill was passed but declared unconstitutional by the state courts almost immediately, so the can got kicked down the road. This past fall, the governor called a special session pf the legislature to address the problem again, legislators met for two days, sat and stared at each other, and decided it could not be fixed, so they went home.
The teachers and kids won again!
OH but teachers don't deserve a pension or benefits or anything like that. It's such an easy job. Minimum wage, maybe less. Aren't they just babysitters?
This is how we're treating teachers and now, this is exactly what we're getting. And, America deserves exactly what is coming because of it. Spiraling right down the drain, like so many other aspects of society. I hate to say it, but we richly deserve what's coming.
Maybe, just maybe teachers should agree that stronger testing and higher standings to remain in the job need to be enacted.
Hard to defend a profession which has unions that fight to keep people who have actually abused children on the payroll. Let alone weeding out teachers who can't teach.
Instead we see teachers pretending they aren't at fault for ANYTHING.
Why do you oppose due process?
I lost my assistant principal position because my boss wanted the job for her best friend. She told me that my contract was not being renewed after I saw my job posted in an email to the district. The reason we have unions is because administrators and school district personnel did this to teachers for a long time. I did nothing wrong, and she knew it, yet she could kick me to the curb in favor of her friend.
Oh well, you don't have a right to a job. Though certainly I would hope that supervisors would hire the best person for the job, why should teaching be any different than any other job in that regard? If you work at let's say GM and they want to fire you, you're out. Why would teaching be any different (except for having the same protections as the guy or ga at GM does against discrimination etc etc)
As for due process, that's a legal term and has nothing to do with being fired from a job that due process is whatever is in your contract with your employer which could mean no due process and if you agreed to that, o h well.
I am sorry, but you do not have a clue as to what you are discussing.
If you get fired at GM, there is Ford and Chrysler, right there. Schools don't work that way. The major difference is teachers are licensed/certified. Autoworkers are not.
I can't drop my job in my state and go next door and pick up a job tomorrow. That's not how it works.
Most of the time these teachers being fired for misconduct are not being afforded due process. They are just being fired for no cause, based on rumor or innuendo. I agree there are times that it seems ridiculous, but that is the price we pay for protecting everyone else.
OH but teachers don't deserve a pension or benefits or anything like that. It's such an easy job. Minimum wage, maybe less. Aren't they just babysitters?
This is how we're treating teachers and now, this is exactly what we're getting. And, America deserves exactly what is coming because of it. Spiraling right down the drain, like so many other aspects of society. I hate to say it, but we richly deserve what's coming.
Maybe, just maybe teachers should agree that stronger testing and higher standings to remain in the job need to be enacted.
Hard to defend a profession which has unions that fight to keep people who have actually abused children on the payroll. Let alone weeding out teachers who can't teach.
Instead we see teachers pretending they aren't at fault for ANYTHING.
Why do you oppose due process?
I lost my assistant principal position because my boss wanted the job for her best friend. She told me that my contract was not being renewed after I saw my job posted in an email to the district. The reason we have unions is because administrators and school district personnel did this to teachers for a long time. I did nothing wrong, and she knew it, yet she could kick me to the curb in favor of her friend.
Oh well, you don't have a right to a job. Though certainly I would hope that supervisors would hire the best person for the job, why should teaching be any different than any other job in that regard? If you work at let's say GM and they want to fire you, you're out. Why would teaching be any different (except for having the same protections as the guy or ga at GM does against discrimination etc etc)
As for due process, that's a legal term and has nothing to do with being fired from a job that due process is whatever is in your contract with your employer which could mean no due process and if you agreed to that, o h well.
I am sorry, but you do not have a clue as to what you are discussing.
If you get fired at GM, there is Ford and Chrysler, right there. Schools don't work that way. The major difference is teachers are licensed/certified. Autoworkers are not.
I can't drop my job in my state and go next door and pick up a job tomorrow. That's not how it works.
Most of the time these teachers being fired for misconduct are not being afforded due process. They are just being fired for no cause, based on rumor or innuendo. I agree there are times that it seems ridiculous, but that is the price we pay for protecting everyone else.
Of course you can quit working at a school in your state and go teach at a school in another state, all you have to do is get certified in that state (and of course you wouldn't even have to leave the state you could just go to a different school IN the state)
And those certifications are EASY to get.
Don't make teaching out to be harder than it is.
Maybe, just maybe teachers should agree that stronger testing and higher standings to remain in the job need to be enacted.
Hard to defend a profession which has unions that fight to keep people who have actually abused children on the payroll. Let alone weeding out teachers who can't teach.
Instead we see teachers pretending they aren't at fault for ANYTHING.
Why do you oppose due process?
I lost my assistant principal position because my boss wanted the job for her best friend. She told me that my contract was not being renewed after I saw my job posted in an email to the district. The reason we have unions is because administrators and school district personnel did this to teachers for a long time. I did nothing wrong, and she knew it, yet she could kick me to the curb in favor of her friend.
Oh well, you don't have a right to a job. Though certainly I would hope that supervisors would hire the best person for the job, why should teaching be any different than any other job in that regard? If you work at let's say GM and they want to fire you, you're out. Why would teaching be any different (except for having the same protections as the guy or ga at GM does against discrimination etc etc)
As for due process, that's a legal term and has nothing to do with being fired from a job that due process is whatever is in your contract with your employer which could mean no due process and if you agreed to that, o h well.
I am sorry, but you do not have a clue as to what you are discussing.
If you get fired at GM, there is Ford and Chrysler, right there. Schools don't work that way. The major difference is teachers are licensed/certified. Autoworkers are not.
I can't drop my job in my state and go next door and pick up a job tomorrow. That's not how it works.
Most of the time these teachers being fired for misconduct are not being afforded due process. They are just being fired for no cause, based on rumor or innuendo. I agree there are times that it seems ridiculous, but that is the price we pay for protecting everyone else.
Of course you can quit working at a school in your state and go teach at a school in another state, all you have to do is get certified in that state (and of course you wouldn't even have to leave the state you could just go to a different school IN the state)
And those certifications are EASY to get.
Don't make teaching out to be harder than it is.
You know nothing about the certification process do you? Typical.
